NCT05792189

Brief Summary

Supracondylar femur periprosthetic fractures about a total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are a catastrophic and challenging complication of TKA and unfortunately are increasing in incidence. Fixation of these fractures can be challenging due to altered anatomy for the TKA and the presence of the metallic femoral component and have a relatively high complication rate. As a result, some surgeons elect to treat these fractures with a distal femur replacement total knee arthroplasty (DFR). The purpose of this study is to prospectively evaluate periprosthetic femur fractures treated with ORIF or DFR and compare various outcomes measures (Get up and go times, KOOS Jr score)

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
100

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
36mo left

Started Apr 2023

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress51%
Apr 2023Apr 2029

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 28, 2023

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 31, 2023

Completed
12 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 12, 2023

Completed
6 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 1, 2029

Expected
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 1, 2029

Last Updated

July 31, 2025

Status Verified

July 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

6 years

First QC Date

February 28, 2023

Last Update Submit

July 29, 2025

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of distal femur fracture

    Subjects will perform the Timed Up and Go Test, This test is used to assess mobility. Subjects are asked to wear regular footwear and can use their walking device as needed. Subjects begin by sitting in a standard armchair. Next participants are instructed to walk 10 feet to a designated line at a normal pace. Once they reach the line they are to turn and walk back to the chair and sit down. The test starts on the study staff go signal and ends once the subject is fully seated in the chair.

    Up to 2 years

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Distal femur replacement total knee arthroplasty (DFR) of distal femur fracture

    Up to 2 years

Study Arms (2)

Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of distal femur fracture

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Su Type 2 or 3 periprosthetic distal femur fractures about a total knee after undergoing ORIF for a minimum of 2 years

Other: Timed Up and Go Test on subjects with ORIF of distal femur fracturesOther: Koos Jr assesment on subjects with ORIF of distal femur fractures

Distal femur replacement total knee arthroplasty (DFR) of distal femur fracture

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Su Type 2 or 3 periprosthetic distal femur fractures about a total knee after undergoing DFR for a minimum of 2 years

Other: Timed Up and Go Test on subjects with DFR of distal femur fractureOther: Koos Jr assesment on subjects with DFR of distal femur fracture

Interventions

Subjects will perform the Timed Up and Go Test This test is used to assess mobility. Subjects are asked to wear regular footwear and can use their walking device as needed. Subjects begin by sitting in a standard armchair. Next participants are instructed to walk 10 feet to a designated line at a normal pace. Once they reach the line they are to turn and walk back to the chair and sit down. The test starts on the study staff go signal and ends once the subject is fully seated in the chair. Test will be performed at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months post surgical treatment.

Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of distal femur fracture

Subjects will complete the KOOS Jr assessment. The Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) is a self-reported outcome measure assessing the patient's opinion about the health, symptoms, and functionality of their knee. It is a 42-item questionnaire, including 5 subscales: symptoms, pain, ADLs, sports/recreation, and quality of life. The maximum score a patient can achieve is 100, indicating no knee problems. The minimum score is zero, indicating severe knee problems.

Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of distal femur fracture

Subjects will perform the Timed Up and Go Test This test is used to assess mobility. Subjects are asked to wear regular footwear and can use their walking device as needed. Subjects begin by sitting in a standard armchair. Next participants are instructed to walk 10 feet to a designated line at a normal pace. Once they reach the line they are to turn and walk back to the chair and sit down. The test starts on the study staff go signal and ends once the subject is fully seated in the chair. Test will be performed at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months post surgical treatment.

Distal femur replacement total knee arthroplasty (DFR) of distal femur fracture

Subjects will complete the KOOS Jr assessment. The Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) is a self-reported outcome measure assessing the patient's opinion about the health, symptoms, and functionality of their knee. It is a 42-item questionnaire, including 5 subscales: symptoms, pain, ADLs, sports/recreation, and quality of life. The maximum score a patient can achieve is 100, indicating no knee problems. The minimum score is zero, indicating severe knee problems.

Distal femur replacement total knee arthroplasty (DFR) of distal femur fracture

Eligibility Criteria

Age55 Years - 100 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • English speaking patients
  • years or older with Su Type II or Su Type III periprosthetic femur fractures or OTA/OA 33C or 338/3 native knee distal femur fracturing requiring surgical intervention and are medically fit to undergo surgical intervention

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients with an active total knee prosthetic infection
  • Patients unable to undergo surgical intervention
  • Patient with an open fracture
  • Non-English-speaking patients
  • Oncologic/pathologic fracture
  • Poly-trauma patient (or other associated major orthopaedic injuries)

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

UF & Shands Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine Institute

Gainesville, Florida, 32607, United States

RECRUITING

Related Publications (5)

  • Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, Mowat F, Halpern M. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 Apr;89(4):780-5. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.F.00222.

    PMID: 17403800BACKGROUND
  • Sloan M, Premkumar A, Sheth NP. Projected Volume of Primary Total Joint Arthroplasty in the U.S., 2014 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018 Sep 5;100(17):1455-1460. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.17.01617.

    PMID: 30180053BACKGROUND
  • Hart GP, Kneisl JS, Springer BD, Patt JC, Karunakar MA. Open Reduction vs Distal Femoral Replacement Arthroplasty for Comminuted Distal Femur Fractures in the Patients 70 Years and Older. J Arthroplasty. 2017 Jan;32(1):202-206. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.06.006. Epub 2016 Jun 23.

    PMID: 27449717BACKGROUND
  • Wadhwa H, Salazar BP, Goodnough LH, Van Rysselberghe NL, DeBaun MR, Wong HN, Gardner MJ, Bishop JA. Distal Femur Replacement Versus Open Reduction and Internal Fixation for Treatment of Periprosthetic Distal Femur Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Orthop Trauma. 2022 Jan 1;36(1):1-6. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000002141.

    PMID: 34001801BACKGROUND
  • Darrith B, Bohl DD, Karadsheh MS, Sporer SM, Berger RA, Levine BR. Periprosthetic Fractures of the Distal Femur: Is Open Reduction and Internal Fixation or Distal Femoral Replacement Superior? J Arthroplasty. 2020 May;35(5):1402-1406. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.12.033. Epub 2019 Dec 20.

    PMID: 31924488BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Femoral Fractures, Distal

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Femoral FracturesFractures, BoneWounds and InjuriesLeg Injuries

Central Study Contacts

Matthew Patrick, MD

CONTACT

Dykes Viginia, DAT

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Prospective, non randomized study
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 28, 2023

First Posted

March 31, 2023

Study Start

April 12, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

April 1, 2029

Study Completion (Estimated)

April 1, 2029

Last Updated

July 31, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-07

Locations