Distal Femur Fx: ORIF(Open Reduction and Internal Fixation) vs DFR (Distal Femur Replacement Total Knee Arthroplasty)
Evaluation of the Management of Periprosthetic Distal Femur Fractures and Native Knee Distal Femur Fractures, Comparing Open Reduction Internal Fixation With Distal Femur Replacement, a Prospective Cohort Study
1 other identifier
interventional
100
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Supracondylar femur periprosthetic fractures about a total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are a catastrophic and challenging complication of TKA and unfortunately are increasing in incidence. Fixation of these fractures can be challenging due to altered anatomy for the TKA and the presence of the metallic femoral component and have a relatively high complication rate. As a result, some surgeons elect to treat these fractures with a distal femur replacement total knee arthroplasty (DFR). The purpose of this study is to prospectively evaluate periprosthetic femur fractures treated with ORIF or DFR and compare various outcomes measures (Get up and go times, KOOS Jr score)
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2023
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 28, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 31, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 12, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2029
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2029
July 31, 2025
July 1, 2025
6 years
February 28, 2023
July 29, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of distal femur fracture
Subjects will perform the Timed Up and Go Test, This test is used to assess mobility. Subjects are asked to wear regular footwear and can use their walking device as needed. Subjects begin by sitting in a standard armchair. Next participants are instructed to walk 10 feet to a designated line at a normal pace. Once they reach the line they are to turn and walk back to the chair and sit down. The test starts on the study staff go signal and ends once the subject is fully seated in the chair.
Up to 2 years
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Distal femur replacement total knee arthroplasty (DFR) of distal femur fracture
Up to 2 years
Study Arms (2)
Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of distal femur fracture
ACTIVE COMPARATORSu Type 2 or 3 periprosthetic distal femur fractures about a total knee after undergoing ORIF for a minimum of 2 years
Distal femur replacement total knee arthroplasty (DFR) of distal femur fracture
ACTIVE COMPARATORSu Type 2 or 3 periprosthetic distal femur fractures about a total knee after undergoing DFR for a minimum of 2 years
Interventions
Subjects will perform the Timed Up and Go Test This test is used to assess mobility. Subjects are asked to wear regular footwear and can use their walking device as needed. Subjects begin by sitting in a standard armchair. Next participants are instructed to walk 10 feet to a designated line at a normal pace. Once they reach the line they are to turn and walk back to the chair and sit down. The test starts on the study staff go signal and ends once the subject is fully seated in the chair. Test will be performed at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months post surgical treatment.
Subjects will complete the KOOS Jr assessment. The Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) is a self-reported outcome measure assessing the patient's opinion about the health, symptoms, and functionality of their knee. It is a 42-item questionnaire, including 5 subscales: symptoms, pain, ADLs, sports/recreation, and quality of life. The maximum score a patient can achieve is 100, indicating no knee problems. The minimum score is zero, indicating severe knee problems.
Subjects will perform the Timed Up and Go Test This test is used to assess mobility. Subjects are asked to wear regular footwear and can use their walking device as needed. Subjects begin by sitting in a standard armchair. Next participants are instructed to walk 10 feet to a designated line at a normal pace. Once they reach the line they are to turn and walk back to the chair and sit down. The test starts on the study staff go signal and ends once the subject is fully seated in the chair. Test will be performed at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months post surgical treatment.
Subjects will complete the KOOS Jr assessment. The Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) is a self-reported outcome measure assessing the patient's opinion about the health, symptoms, and functionality of their knee. It is a 42-item questionnaire, including 5 subscales: symptoms, pain, ADLs, sports/recreation, and quality of life. The maximum score a patient can achieve is 100, indicating no knee problems. The minimum score is zero, indicating severe knee problems.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- English speaking patients
- years or older with Su Type II or Su Type III periprosthetic femur fractures or OTA/OA 33C or 338/3 native knee distal femur fracturing requiring surgical intervention and are medically fit to undergo surgical intervention
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with an active total knee prosthetic infection
- Patients unable to undergo surgical intervention
- Patient with an open fracture
- Non-English-speaking patients
- Oncologic/pathologic fracture
- Poly-trauma patient (or other associated major orthopaedic injuries)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
UF & Shands Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine Institute
Gainesville, Florida, 32607, United States
Related Publications (5)
Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, Mowat F, Halpern M. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 Apr;89(4):780-5. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.F.00222.
PMID: 17403800BACKGROUNDSloan M, Premkumar A, Sheth NP. Projected Volume of Primary Total Joint Arthroplasty in the U.S., 2014 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018 Sep 5;100(17):1455-1460. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.17.01617.
PMID: 30180053BACKGROUNDHart GP, Kneisl JS, Springer BD, Patt JC, Karunakar MA. Open Reduction vs Distal Femoral Replacement Arthroplasty for Comminuted Distal Femur Fractures in the Patients 70 Years and Older. J Arthroplasty. 2017 Jan;32(1):202-206. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.06.006. Epub 2016 Jun 23.
PMID: 27449717BACKGROUNDWadhwa H, Salazar BP, Goodnough LH, Van Rysselberghe NL, DeBaun MR, Wong HN, Gardner MJ, Bishop JA. Distal Femur Replacement Versus Open Reduction and Internal Fixation for Treatment of Periprosthetic Distal Femur Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Orthop Trauma. 2022 Jan 1;36(1):1-6. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000002141.
PMID: 34001801BACKGROUNDDarrith B, Bohl DD, Karadsheh MS, Sporer SM, Berger RA, Levine BR. Periprosthetic Fractures of the Distal Femur: Is Open Reduction and Internal Fixation or Distal Femoral Replacement Superior? J Arthroplasty. 2020 May;35(5):1402-1406. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.12.033. Epub 2019 Dec 20.
PMID: 31924488BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 28, 2023
First Posted
March 31, 2023
Study Start
April 12, 2023
Primary Completion (Estimated)
April 1, 2029
Study Completion (Estimated)
April 1, 2029
Last Updated
July 31, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-07