Interest of the Automated Management of Deep Neuromuscular Blockade Monitoring (CURATP)
CURATP
2 other identifiers
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Neuromuscular blockade (NMB) recommendations updated in 2018 by the Société Française d'Anesthésie et Réanimation (SFAR) recommend the use of NMB agents to facilitate surgical procedure during abdominal surgery by laparotomy or laparoscopy. This study aims to evaluate deep NMB monitoring with automated management of NMB depth measurement (ATP mode) versus non-automated monitoring (PTC/TOF), in order to improve the maintenance of deep NMB during abdominal surgery.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2022
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2022
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 6, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 27, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2023
CompletedMarch 27, 2023
March 1, 2023
6 months
February 6, 2023
March 13, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Evaluate the monitoring of deep NMB by automated management of the measurement of depth NMB (ATP mode) compared to non-automated monitoring (PTC/TOF) in order to improve the maintenance of deep NMB during abdominal surgery
Percentage of time spent on deep NMB target during anesthesia, defined by PTC ≥ 1 and ≤ 5 responses
From intubation to surgical closure
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Number of interventions by the anesthesia team to maintain deep curarization
From intubation to surgical closure
Amount of NMB agents administered
From intubation to surgical closure
Need to reverse NMB agents at the end of the procedure
From intubation to surgical closure
Effect of maintaining deep NMB at surgical level during the procedure
From intubation to surgical closure
Surgical conditions on the Leiden Surgical Rating Scale score
From intubation to surgical closure
Study Arms (2)
TOF/PTC
ACTIVE COMPARATORNon-automated neuromuscular blockade monitoring (TOF/PTC). As the NMB monitoring is depending on anesthesiologist usual practice and so only TOF measure is systematic, it is necessary to include a blind anesthesiologist measurement with the ATP mode in order to compare with data obtained during Time 2.
ATP
EXPERIMENTALAutomated neuromuscular blockade monitoring (ATP). TOF and PTC stimulations are regularly performed, and PTC is systematically performed if TOF = 0/4. If PTC = 10/10, a TOF stimulation is automatically performed.
Interventions
Installation of TOFscan® and monitoring by MAR appreciation on one of the patient's wrists and installation of TOFscan® and monitoring by ATP mode (MAR blind) on the other wrist Installation of TOFscan® and monitoring by ATP mode
Installation of TOFscan® and monitoring by ATP mode on one of the patient's wrists
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients will be included if they meet all the following criteria :
- Age ≥ 18 years
- Scheduled Abdominal surgery by laparoscopy (digestive, urological and gynaecological) with a planned procedure duration of more than one hour, requiring deep NMB by rocuronium
- ASA I, II or III
- Free subject, without guardianship, curatorship or subordination
- Signed informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Persons benefiting from enhanced protection, namely minors, persons deprived of their liberty by a judicial or administrative decision, adults under legal protection.
- Induction in rapid sequence,
- Use of an other NMB agent than rocuronium
- Predictable difficult intubation
- Persons participating in another clinical trial
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Centre Hospitalier de Poitiers
Poitiers, Vienne, 86021, France
Related Publications (14)
GRAY TC, HALTON J. Technique for the use of d-tubocurarine chloride with balanced anaesthesia. Br Med J. 1946 Aug 31;2:293-5. No abstract available.
PMID: 20996123RESULTAli HH. A new device for monitoring force of thumb adduction. Br J Anaesth. 1970 Jan;42(1):83-5. doi: 10.1093/bja/42.1.83. No abstract available.
PMID: 4313564RESULTDhonneur G, Kirov K, Motamed C, Amathieu R, Kamoun W, Slavov V, Ndoko SK. Post-tetanic count at adductor pollicis is a better indicator of early diaphragmatic recovery than train-of-four count at corrugator supercilii. Br J Anaesth. 2007 Sep;99(3):376-9. doi: 10.1093/bja/aem124. Epub 2007 Jun 7.
PMID: 17561516RESULTKim HJ, Lee K, Park WK, Lee BR, Joo HM, Koh YW, Seo YW, Kim WS, Yoo YC. Deep neuromuscular block improves the surgical conditions for laryngeal microsurgery. Br J Anaesth. 2015 Dec;115(6):867-72. doi: 10.1093/bja/aev368.
PMID: 26582847RESULTStaehr-Rye AK, Rasmussen LS, Rosenberg J, Juul P, Lindekaer AL, Riber C, Gatke MR. Surgical space conditions during low-pressure laparoscopic cholecystectomy with deep versus moderate neuromuscular blockade: a randomized clinical study. Anesth Analg. 2014 Nov;119(5):1084-92. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000316.
PMID: 24977638RESULTMartini CH, Boon M, Bevers RF, Aarts LP, Dahan A. Evaluation of surgical conditions during laparoscopic surgery in patients with moderate vs deep neuromuscular block. Br J Anaesth. 2014 Mar;112(3):498-505. doi: 10.1093/bja/aet377. Epub 2013 Nov 15.
PMID: 24240315RESULTMadsen MV, Gatke MR, Springborg HH, Rosenberg J, Lund J, Istre O. Optimising abdominal space with deep neuromuscular blockade in gynaecologic laparoscopy--a randomised, blinded crossover study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2015 Apr;59(4):441-7. doi: 10.1111/aas.12493. Epub 2015 Mar 1.
PMID: 25789421RESULTKim MH, Lee KY, Lee KY, Min BS, Yoo YC. Maintaining Optimal Surgical Conditions With Low Insufflation Pressures is Possible With Deep Neuromuscular Blockade During Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel-Group Clinical Trial. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Mar;95(9):e2920. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000002920.
PMID: 26945393RESULTVan Wijk RM, Watts RW, Ledowski T, Trochsler M, Moran JL, Arenas GW. Deep neuromuscular block reduces intra-abdominal pressure requirements during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective observational study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2015 Apr;59(4):434-40. doi: 10.1111/aas.12491. Epub 2015 Feb 13.
PMID: 25684372RESULTKoo BW, Oh AY, Seo KS, Han JW, Han HS, Yoon YS. Randomized Clinical Trial of Moderate Versus Deep Neuromuscular Block for Low-Pressure Pneumoperitoneum During Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. World J Surg. 2016 Dec;40(12):2898-2903. doi: 10.1007/s00268-016-3633-8.
PMID: 27405749RESULTYoo YC, Kim NY, Shin S, Choi YD, Hong JH, Kim CY, Park H, Bai SJ. The Intraocular Pressure under Deep versus Moderate Neuromuscular Blockade during Low-Pressure Robot Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy in a Randomized Trial. PLoS One. 2015 Aug 28;10(8):e0135412. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0135412. eCollection 2015.
PMID: 26317357RESULTPlaud B, Baillard C, Bourgain JL, Bouroche G, Desplanque L, Devys JM, Fletcher D, Fuchs-Buder T, Lebuffe G, Meistelman C, Motamed C, Raft J, Servin F, Sirieix D, Slim K, Velly L, Verdonk F, Debaene B. Guidelines on muscle relaxants and reversal in anaesthesia. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2020 Feb;39(1):125-142. doi: 10.1016/j.accpm.2020.01.005. Epub 2020 Jan 8.
PMID: 31926308RESULTMurphy GS, Szokol JW, Avram MJ, Greenberg SB, Shear TD, Deshur M, Benson J, Newmark RL, Maher CE. Comparison of the TOFscan and the TOF-Watch SX during Recovery of Neuromuscular Function. Anesthesiology. 2018 Nov;129(5):880-888. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000002400.
PMID: 30130260RESULTClaudius C, Skovgaard LT, Viby-Mogensen J. Arm-to-arm variation when evaluating neuromuscular block: an analysis of the precision and the bias and agreement between arms when using mechanomyography or acceleromyography. Br J Anaesth. 2010 Sep;105(3):310-7. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeq162. Epub 2010 Jun 30.
PMID: 20595196RESULT
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
MATTHIEU M BOISSON, Professor
University Center Hospital of Poitiers
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
- Masking Details
- Masking only for the anesthesist in arms "Time 1"
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 6, 2023
First Posted
March 27, 2023
Study Start
November 1, 2022
Primary Completion
May 1, 2023
Study Completion
May 1, 2023
Last Updated
March 27, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-03