Reversal of Neuromuscular Blockade and Perioperative Arrhythmias
Influence of the Neuromuscular Blockade and Its Reversal on Perioperative Arrhythmias
1 other identifier
interventional
80
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Patients scheduled for elective abdominopelvic laparoscopic surgery under general anesthesia were included. Rocuronium was used for the neuromuscular blockade (NMB) and the level of NMB was monitored with train-of-four (TOF) measurements. The participants from whom informed consent had been received were allocated to two groups according to the agent used for reversal of NMB, sugammadex, or neostigmine. The ECG recordings of the subjects were followed with a rhythm Holter device throughout the procedure until the postoperative 12th hour. Additionally, preoperative and immediate postoperative 12-lead ECGs were evaluated for corrected QT calculations and QT dispersion. Proarrhythmogenicity was assessed with QT related measurements. The documented arrhythmic events on the Holter monitoring were designated as clinical end-points.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2019
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 19, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 22, 2021
CompletedJanuary 22, 2021
January 1, 2021
4 months
January 19, 2021
January 19, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Significant arrhythmic event
Pause (no waves on ECG recording at least for 3 seconds), significant bradycardia (sinus bradycardia persisted at least for 30 seconds with a rate below 50 beats/min), high-grade atrioventricular block (2nd-degree Mobitz Type II or 3rd degree), supraventricular tachycardia (sudden onset tachycardia with narrow QRS complexes persisted over 30 seconds), atrial flutter or fibrillation (sustained over 30 seconds), Frequent premature ventricular beats (≥30 beats/hour).
Up to 12 hours after surgical procedure
Study Arms (2)
Group N
ACTIVE COMPARATORNeostigmine was used for the reversal of neuromuscular blockade.
Group S
ACTIVE COMPARATORSugammadex was used for the reversal of neuromuscular blockade.
Interventions
50 mcg/kg neostigmine was used under the guidance of TOF monitoring after cessation of anesthesia.
2 mg/kg sugammadex was used under the guidance of TOF monitoring after cessation of anesthesia.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Planned abdominopelvic surgery under general anesthesia
- ASA II-IV
- Willing to give consent
You may not qualify if:
- Significantly impaired left ventricular systolic function (ejection fraction \< 40%)
- Significant ongoing arrhythmia (sinus bradycardia with a heart rate below 40 beats/min, Mobitz Type II or 3rd-grade atrioventricular block, persistent or permanent atrial flutter or fibrillation, bigeminal or trigeminal ventricular premature beats, documented ventricular tachycardia)
- Severely reduced renal function (glomerular filtration rate \< 30 ml/min/1.73 m2)
- Severe respiratory diseases, neuromuscular disorders, and known allergy to anesthetic agents or adjuvants
- Pregnancy and breastfeeding
- Observing the typical signs of a channelopathy (short QT syndrome, long QT syndrome, Brugada syndrome, etc.) and history of recent medical therapy with agents exhibiting a high probability of QT prolongation
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Başakşehir Çam & Sakura City Hospitallead
- Medipol Universitycollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Istanbul Medipol University
Istanbul, 34214, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (7)
Lorentz MN, Vianna BS. Cardiac dysrhythmias and anesthesia. Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2011 Nov-Dec;61(6):798-813. doi: 10.1016/S0034-7094(11)70090-3. English, Multiple languages.
PMID: 22063382BACKGROUNDDahl V, Pendeville PE, Hollmann MW, Heier T, Abels EA, Blobner M. Safety and efficacy of sugammadex for the reversal of rocuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade in cardiac patients undergoing noncardiac surgery. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2009 Oct;26(10):874-84. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e32832c605b.
PMID: 19455040BACKGROUNDKizilay D, Dal D, Saracoglu KT, Eti Z, Gogus FY. Comparison of neostigmine and sugammadex for hemodynamic parameters in cardiac patients undergoing noncardiac surgery. J Clin Anesth. 2016 Feb;28:30-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2015.08.002. Epub 2015 Nov 11.
PMID: 26796612BACKGROUNDStaikou C, Stamelos M, Stavroulakis E. Impact of anaesthetic drugs and adjuvants on ECG markers of torsadogenicity. Br J Anaesth. 2014 Feb;112(2):217-30. doi: 10.1093/bja/aet412. Epub 2013 Dec 3.
PMID: 24305646RESULTCarron M, Zarantonello F, Tellaroli P, Ori C. Efficacy and safety of sugammadex compared to neostigmine for reversal of neuromuscular blockade: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Clin Anesth. 2016 Dec;35:1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2016.06.018. Epub 2016 Aug 4.
PMID: 27871504RESULTHristovska AM, Duch P, Allingstrup M, Afshari A. The comparative efficacy and safety of sugammadex and neostigmine in reversing neuromuscular blockade in adults. A Cochrane systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis. Anaesthesia. 2018 May;73(5):631-641. doi: 10.1111/anae.14160. Epub 2017 Dec 27.
PMID: 29280475RESULTYamashita Y, Takasusuki T, Kimura Y, Komatsuzaki M, Yamaguchi S. Effects of Neostigmine and Sugammadex for Reversal of Neuromuscular Blockade on QT Dispersion Under Propofol Anesthesia: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Cardiol Ther. 2018 Dec;7(2):163-172. doi: 10.1007/s40119-018-0119-9. Epub 2018 Sep 14.
PMID: 30218410RESULT
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR
- Masking Details
- The investigator assessing the ECGs, and rhythm holter recordings was blinded to randomization.
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 19, 2021
First Posted
January 22, 2021
Study Start
June 1, 2019
Primary Completion
October 1, 2019
Study Completion
November 1, 2019
Last Updated
January 22, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share