COronary Re-engageMent aFter randOm NavitoR alignmenT (COMFORT STUDY)
COMFORT
COronary Re-EngageMent aFter RandOm NavitoR Alignment (COMFORT STUDY)
1 other identifier
observational
100
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Whereas PCI before TAVR was previously recommended despite its uncertain prognostic role, recent data underline the possibility of a postponed coronary intervention using a commissural alignment technique. This approach allows easy coronary re-engagement through the valve stent frame with a trade off paid of procedure complexity. Considering the prevalence of coronary artery disease (CAD) and the increasing percentage of younger patients treated with TAVI, investigate whether a simpler procedure with random implantation of Navitor valve is not inferior in terms of coronary re-access, is required The key point of the project will be the evaluation of the feasibility of coronary re-engagement after a Navitor valve randomly implanted.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Feb 2023
Longer than P75 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 15, 2023
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 10, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 22, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 15, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 15, 2027
April 16, 2026
April 1, 2026
4 years
March 10, 2023
April 13, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Coronary re-access after TAVR procedure
Re-engagement of LMCA and RCA after valve implantation is defined as selective cannulation and subsequent selective angiography. All others type of re-engagement will be classify as "non selective". We will stratify also the modality of re-cannulation in relation to the position of the valves' stent struts as "above", "across" and "behind".
During procedure
Secondary Outcomes (13)
Total Implant Time
During procedure
Total Implant Fluoroscopy Time
During procedure
Total Implant Radiations
During procedure
Total Implant Contrast
During procedure
Alignment Radiation
During procedure
- +8 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
TAVR performed with commissural alignment technique (Aligned Group)
Patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing TAVR procedure performed with commissural alignment technique. We consider in this groups only the Accurate and Accurate Neo 2 Valve which are the first choice due to the best stent frames position predictability with this technique
TAVR performed with random implantation of Navitor valve (Random Group)
Patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing TAVR procedure performed with random implantation of Navitor Valve
Interventions
Investigate the feasibility of coronary re-engagement after commissural alignment technique in terms of success rate (%) and procedure complexity taking into account radiations, time and contrast used.
TAVR Random Feasibility comparison of coronary re-engagement between the randomly implanted Navitor valve (unaligned) and the others implanted with the commissural alignment technique in terms of success rate (%) and complexity of the procedure, taking into account radiation, time and contrast used
Eligibility Criteria
Consecutive patients with severe aortic stenosis diagnosed according to ESC guidelines, undergoing transcatheters aortic valve replacement with Navitor valve randomly implanted or Acurate Neo with commisural alignment technique
You may not qualify if:
- Patients excluded in this registry should have all the following criteria:
- Valve in Valve procedure
- Hemodynamical instability
- TAVR performed from other access (not femoral)
- No-CT Planned TAVR
- TAVR performed with Chimney Technique
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
ASST GOM Niguarda
Milan, Lombardy, 20162, Italy
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 10, 2023
First Posted
March 22, 2023
Study Start
February 15, 2023
Primary Completion (Estimated)
February 15, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
May 15, 2027
Last Updated
April 16, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-04