NCT05767437

Brief Summary

This study is performed in a controlled randomized, two-period crossover design to test the efficacy of Abdominal drawing-in maneuver (ADIM) exercise compared to conventional physiotherapy in chronic stroke survivors.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
20

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2022

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 10, 2022

Completed
5 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 23, 2022

Completed
3 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 14, 2023

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 30, 2023

Completed
11 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 10, 2023

Completed
1.8 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

May 23, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

May 23, 2025

Status Verified

May 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

12 months

First QC Date

December 23, 2022

Results QC Date

January 12, 2024

Last Update Submit

May 21, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

Reaching taskAbdominal drawing-in maneuverADIMChronic stroke

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • The Effect of a Particular Intervention During the Entire Course of the study_Trunk Dislocation

    We defined hand movement onset as the time when tangential velocity exceeded 10% of peak velocity and movement offset as when it fell below 10%. Participants who received that particular intervention during the entire course of the study. Effect of Abdominal Drawing-In Maneuver (AIDM) exercise and Shan therapy. Dislocation distance in millimeters(mm) for reaching phase

    Baseline, two period(each 4weeks), wash out(4weeks)

  • The Effect of a Particular Intervention During the Entire Course of the Study_movement Unit

    We defined hand movement onset as the time when tangential velocity exceeded 10% of peak velocity and movement offset as when it fell below 10%. It was defined by velocity peaks exceeding 20mm/s, with a minimum 150 ms interval. Participants who received that particular intervention during the entire course of the study. Number of movement units for reaching phase

    Baseline, two period(each 4weeks), wash out(4weeks)

  • The Effect of a Particular Intervention During the Entire Course of the Study_Elbow Angle

    We defined hand movement onset as the time when tangential velocity exceeded 10% of peak velocity and movement offset as when it fell below 10% Elbow angle in degree for reaching phase Participants who received that particular intervention during the entire course of the study. -elbow angle: joining vector of acromion to lateral epicondyle and vector of lateral epicondyle and medial styloid process.

    Baseline, two period(each 4weeks), wash out(4weeks)

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • The Effect of a Particular Intervention During the Entire Course of the Study_Total Time

    Baseline, two period(each 4weeks), wash out(4weeks)

  • The Effect of a Particular Intervention During the Entire Course of the Study_Hand Velocity

    Baseline, two period(each 4weeks), wash out(4weeks)

  • The Effect of a Particular Intervention During the Entire Course of the Study_Elbow Angular Velocity

    Baseline, two period(each 4weeks), wash out(4weeks)

Other Outcomes (2)

  • Modified Ashworth Scale(MAS)_Stiffness of Chronic Stroke

    Baseline

  • Fugl Meyer Assessment(FMA)_Health Status Chronic Stroke

    Baseline

Study Arms (2)

Abdominal drawing-in maneuver exercise, afterward Sham therapy(conventional physiotherapy)

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants first received Abdominal drawing-in maneuver exercise 2 times a week for 4 weeks. Each session is 40 minutes for additional 10 min with conventional therapy. Afterward a washout period of one month, they then received sham therapy (conventional therapy\_release pain or upper limb mobilization) 2 times a week for 4 weeks. Each session is 40 minutes.

Behavioral: Abdominal drawing-in maneuver exerciseBehavioral: sham

Sham therapy(conventional physiotherapy), afterward Abdominal drawing-in maneuver exercise

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants first received sham therapy(release pain or upper limb mobilization)2 times a week for 4 weeks. Each session is 40 minutes. Afterward a washout period of one month, they then received Abdominal drawing-in maneuver exercise 2 times a week for 4 weeks. Each session is 40 minutes for additional 10 min with conventional therapy

Behavioral: Abdominal drawing-in maneuver exerciseBehavioral: sham

Interventions

From the supine position to the hook-lying position (hip joint at 40 degrees and the knee joint at 80 degrees) and pull the navel deeply to the lumbar region through the Stabilizer™ Pressure Biofeedback that stabilize transversus abdominis muscle. At this time, subjects are controlled to maintain contraction while keep breathing lightly, to contract slowly, also to not move the pelvis and chest while exercising

Also known as: Stabilizer pressure biofeedback
Abdominal drawing-in maneuver exercise, afterward Sham therapy(conventional physiotherapy)Sham therapy(conventional physiotherapy), afterward Abdominal drawing-in maneuver exercise
shamBEHAVIORAL

Release pain or upper limb mobilization

Also known as: Conventional therapy
Abdominal drawing-in maneuver exercise, afterward Sham therapy(conventional physiotherapy)Sham therapy(conventional physiotherapy), afterward Abdominal drawing-in maneuver exercise

Eligibility Criteria

Age40 Years - 85 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • The subject consisted of the physician's confirmation of chronic hemiplegia
  • onset ≥ 6 months
  • Mini-mental state examination≥25
  • Biceps ≤2, Triceps≤2
  • Ability to Sit on a chair alone
  • FMA UE score ≥ 21points, FMA UE≤ 60 points

You may not qualify if:

  • Biceps\>2, Triceps\>2
  • Flaccid
  • Neglect syndrome
  • Have neurological disease and orthopedic disease
  • Lack of coordination

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology

Ulsan, Ulju, 44919, South Korea

Location

Related Publications (8)

  • Messier S, Bourbonnais D, Desrosiers J, Roy Y. Dynamic analysis of trunk flexion after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004 Oct;85(10):1619-24. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2003.12.043.

    PMID: 15468021BACKGROUND
  • Cirstea MC, Levin MF. Compensatory strategies for reaching in stroke. Brain. 2000 May;123 ( Pt 5):940-53. doi: 10.1093/brain/123.5.940.

    PMID: 10775539BACKGROUND
  • Velozo CA, Woodbury ML. Translating measurement findings into rehabilitation practice: an example using Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremity with patients following stroke. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2011;48(10):1211-22. doi: 10.1682/jrrd.2010.10.0203.

    PMID: 22234665BACKGROUND
  • Verheyden G, Nieuwboer A, Mertin J, Preger R, Kiekens C, De Weerdt W. The Trunk Impairment Scale: a new tool to measure motor impairment of the trunk after stroke. Clin Rehabil. 2004 May;18(3):326-34. doi: 10.1191/0269215504cr733oa.

    PMID: 15137564BACKGROUND
  • Lee PY, Huang JC, Tseng HY, Yang YC, Lin SI. Effects of Trunk Exercise on Unstable Surfaces in Persons with Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Dec 7;17(23):9135. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17239135.

    PMID: 33297451BACKGROUND
  • Kelli A, Kellis E, Galanis N, Dafkou K, Sahinis C, Ellinoudis A. Transversus Abdominis Thickness at Rest and Exercise in Individuals with Poststroke Hemiparesis. Sports (Basel). 2020 Jun 12;8(6):86. doi: 10.3390/sports8060086.

    PMID: 32545550BACKGROUND
  • Haruyama K, Kawakami M, Otsuka T. Effect of Core Stability Training on Trunk Function, Standing Balance, and Mobility in Stroke Patients. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2017 Mar;31(3):240-249. doi: 10.1177/1545968316675431. Epub 2016 Nov 9.

  • Wu CY, Liing RJ, Chen HC, Chen CL, Lin KC. Arm and trunk movement kinematics during seated reaching within and beyond arm's length in people with stroke: a validity study. Phys Ther. 2014 Jun;94(6):845-56. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20130101. Epub 2014 Jan 30.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

StrokeHemiplegia

Interventions

salicylhydroxamic acid

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Cerebrovascular DisordersBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesVascular DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesParalysisNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Limitations and Caveats

we must acknowledge a limitation in our study related to the influence of a carryover effect and period effect. This phenomenon may be partially explained within the context of persistence of treatment and learned behavior. Secondly, our study employed a crossover design, spanning a three-month duration. Despite random allocation, four participants dropped out during the washout period, leading to a smaller sample size and uneven group distribution in period 2.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Jose casaña Granell
Organization
University of Valencia

Study Officials

  • Jóse Casaña Granell, PhD

    University of Valencia

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Joaquin Calatayud Villalba, PhD

    University of Valencia

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Sang Hoon Kang, PhD

    Ulsan National Institute of Science&Technology

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
Masking Details
Double-blind.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Model Details: One group is the abdominal drawing-in maneuver exercise, afterward conventional physiotherapy in Participants With stroke survivors. On the contrary, Another group is conventional physiotherapy afterward the abdominal drawing-in maneuver exercise.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 23, 2022

First Posted

March 14, 2023

Study Start

August 10, 2022

Primary Completion

July 30, 2023

Study Completion

August 10, 2023

Last Updated

May 23, 2025

Results First Posted

May 23, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-05

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations