The Effects of Reaching Task Following Selective Trunk Stability Exercise
1 other identifier
interventional
20
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study is performed in a controlled randomized, two-period crossover design to test the efficacy of Abdominal drawing-in maneuver (ADIM) exercise compared to conventional physiotherapy in chronic stroke survivors.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2022
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 10, 2022
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 23, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 14, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 30, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 10, 2023
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
May 23, 2025
CompletedMay 23, 2025
May 1, 2025
12 months
December 23, 2022
January 12, 2024
May 21, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
The Effect of a Particular Intervention During the Entire Course of the study_Trunk Dislocation
We defined hand movement onset as the time when tangential velocity exceeded 10% of peak velocity and movement offset as when it fell below 10%. Participants who received that particular intervention during the entire course of the study. Effect of Abdominal Drawing-In Maneuver (AIDM) exercise and Shan therapy. Dislocation distance in millimeters(mm) for reaching phase
Baseline, two period(each 4weeks), wash out(4weeks)
The Effect of a Particular Intervention During the Entire Course of the Study_movement Unit
We defined hand movement onset as the time when tangential velocity exceeded 10% of peak velocity and movement offset as when it fell below 10%. It was defined by velocity peaks exceeding 20mm/s, with a minimum 150 ms interval. Participants who received that particular intervention during the entire course of the study. Number of movement units for reaching phase
Baseline, two period(each 4weeks), wash out(4weeks)
The Effect of a Particular Intervention During the Entire Course of the Study_Elbow Angle
We defined hand movement onset as the time when tangential velocity exceeded 10% of peak velocity and movement offset as when it fell below 10% Elbow angle in degree for reaching phase Participants who received that particular intervention during the entire course of the study. -elbow angle: joining vector of acromion to lateral epicondyle and vector of lateral epicondyle and medial styloid process.
Baseline, two period(each 4weeks), wash out(4weeks)
Secondary Outcomes (3)
The Effect of a Particular Intervention During the Entire Course of the Study_Total Time
Baseline, two period(each 4weeks), wash out(4weeks)
The Effect of a Particular Intervention During the Entire Course of the Study_Hand Velocity
Baseline, two period(each 4weeks), wash out(4weeks)
The Effect of a Particular Intervention During the Entire Course of the Study_Elbow Angular Velocity
Baseline, two period(each 4weeks), wash out(4weeks)
Other Outcomes (2)
Modified Ashworth Scale(MAS)_Stiffness of Chronic Stroke
Baseline
Fugl Meyer Assessment(FMA)_Health Status Chronic Stroke
Baseline
Study Arms (2)
Abdominal drawing-in maneuver exercise, afterward Sham therapy(conventional physiotherapy)
EXPERIMENTALParticipants first received Abdominal drawing-in maneuver exercise 2 times a week for 4 weeks. Each session is 40 minutes for additional 10 min with conventional therapy. Afterward a washout period of one month, they then received sham therapy (conventional therapy\_release pain or upper limb mobilization) 2 times a week for 4 weeks. Each session is 40 minutes.
Sham therapy(conventional physiotherapy), afterward Abdominal drawing-in maneuver exercise
EXPERIMENTALParticipants first received sham therapy(release pain or upper limb mobilization)2 times a week for 4 weeks. Each session is 40 minutes. Afterward a washout period of one month, they then received Abdominal drawing-in maneuver exercise 2 times a week for 4 weeks. Each session is 40 minutes for additional 10 min with conventional therapy
Interventions
From the supine position to the hook-lying position (hip joint at 40 degrees and the knee joint at 80 degrees) and pull the navel deeply to the lumbar region through the Stabilizer™ Pressure Biofeedback that stabilize transversus abdominis muscle. At this time, subjects are controlled to maintain contraction while keep breathing lightly, to contract slowly, also to not move the pelvis and chest while exercising
Release pain or upper limb mobilization
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- The subject consisted of the physician's confirmation of chronic hemiplegia
- onset ≥ 6 months
- Mini-mental state examination≥25
- Biceps ≤2, Triceps≤2
- Ability to Sit on a chair alone
- FMA UE score ≥ 21points, FMA UE≤ 60 points
You may not qualify if:
- Biceps\>2, Triceps\>2
- Flaccid
- Neglect syndrome
- Have neurological disease and orthopedic disease
- Lack of coordination
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology
Ulsan, Ulju, 44919, South Korea
Related Publications (8)
Messier S, Bourbonnais D, Desrosiers J, Roy Y. Dynamic analysis of trunk flexion after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004 Oct;85(10):1619-24. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2003.12.043.
PMID: 15468021BACKGROUNDCirstea MC, Levin MF. Compensatory strategies for reaching in stroke. Brain. 2000 May;123 ( Pt 5):940-53. doi: 10.1093/brain/123.5.940.
PMID: 10775539BACKGROUNDVelozo CA, Woodbury ML. Translating measurement findings into rehabilitation practice: an example using Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremity with patients following stroke. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2011;48(10):1211-22. doi: 10.1682/jrrd.2010.10.0203.
PMID: 22234665BACKGROUNDVerheyden G, Nieuwboer A, Mertin J, Preger R, Kiekens C, De Weerdt W. The Trunk Impairment Scale: a new tool to measure motor impairment of the trunk after stroke. Clin Rehabil. 2004 May;18(3):326-34. doi: 10.1191/0269215504cr733oa.
PMID: 15137564BACKGROUNDLee PY, Huang JC, Tseng HY, Yang YC, Lin SI. Effects of Trunk Exercise on Unstable Surfaces in Persons with Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Dec 7;17(23):9135. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17239135.
PMID: 33297451BACKGROUNDKelli A, Kellis E, Galanis N, Dafkou K, Sahinis C, Ellinoudis A. Transversus Abdominis Thickness at Rest and Exercise in Individuals with Poststroke Hemiparesis. Sports (Basel). 2020 Jun 12;8(6):86. doi: 10.3390/sports8060086.
PMID: 32545550BACKGROUNDHaruyama K, Kawakami M, Otsuka T. Effect of Core Stability Training on Trunk Function, Standing Balance, and Mobility in Stroke Patients. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2017 Mar;31(3):240-249. doi: 10.1177/1545968316675431. Epub 2016 Nov 9.
PMID: 27821673RESULTWu CY, Liing RJ, Chen HC, Chen CL, Lin KC. Arm and trunk movement kinematics during seated reaching within and beyond arm's length in people with stroke: a validity study. Phys Ther. 2014 Jun;94(6):845-56. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20130101. Epub 2014 Jan 30.
PMID: 24481598RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
we must acknowledge a limitation in our study related to the influence of a carryover effect and period effect. This phenomenon may be partially explained within the context of persistence of treatment and learned behavior. Secondly, our study employed a crossover design, spanning a three-month duration. Despite random allocation, four participants dropped out during the washout period, leading to a smaller sample size and uneven group distribution in period 2.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Jose casaña Granell
- Organization
- University of Valencia
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jóse Casaña Granell, PhD
University of Valencia
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Joaquin Calatayud Villalba, PhD
University of Valencia
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Sang Hoon Kang, PhD
Ulsan National Institute of Science&Technology
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Masking Details
- Double-blind.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 23, 2022
First Posted
March 14, 2023
Study Start
August 10, 2022
Primary Completion
July 30, 2023
Study Completion
August 10, 2023
Last Updated
May 23, 2025
Results First Posted
May 23, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share