NCT05761873

Brief Summary

Public Health England have estimated that 36,000 excess deaths occur each year due to UK air pollution. Respiratory inhalers produce 3% of NHS greenhouse gas production. The two main inhaler device categories are pressurised Metered Dose Inhalers (pMDIs) and Dry Powder Inhalers (DPIs). The chemical propellant in pMDIs is the majority cause of inhaler carbon footprint, with pMDIs having an 18 times higher carbon footprint than DPIs. The rates of asthma in the UK population are amongst the highest worldwide and its mortality rate remains amongst the worst in Europe. A pre-existing Audit and Feedback (A\&F) quality improvement project (QIP) is being undertaken by NHS West Yorkshire Integrated Care Board (ICB) with the aim of improving asthma outcomes and reducing the environmental impact of inhalers in primary care. The A\&F being utilised here has been validated locally in two peer reviewed studies and is now standard practice in the region. There is convincing evidence that A\&F has a positive effect on enacting behaviour change, especially where behaviour change is related to prescribing with low baseline compliance with guidelines. However, the evidence base is poor on which design features of A\&F produce enhanced results. There is supporting evidence from local studies suggesting that posted paper A\&F may be more effective at producing behaviour change than emailed copies of A\&F alone. This study seeks to randomise the primary care practices within the pre-arranged QIP, to receive either a paper and emailed A\&F report bimonthly for the duration of the study period, or to receive an emailed A\&F report alone. The primary outcome of the study would be a comparison of the number of 'low-global warming potential' inhalers prescribed as a percentage of the total prescribed inhalers from each intervention group.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
273

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable asthma

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2023

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 27, 2023

Completed
10 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 9, 2023

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 24, 2023

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 17, 2024

Completed
11 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 17, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

January 22, 2026

Status Verified

January 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

1.1 years

First QC Date

February 27, 2023

Last Update Submit

January 19, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

PaperEmailAudit and FeedbackBehavioural Change TaxonomyInhalersClimate changeEnvironmentCarbon dioxidepMDIDPISpacerPrimary carePrescribingTheoretical Domains Framework

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • High-global warming potential' pMDI inhalers use

    The number of 'high-global warming potential' preventer pMDI inhalers prescribed as a proportion of the total prescribed preventer inhalers for patients with asthma from each primary care practice - limited to those aged over 5.

    1 year

Secondary Outcomes (7)

  • 6 or more SABA's prescriptions

    1 year

  • 12 or more SABA's prescriptions

    1 year

  • 3 or less inhaled corticosteroids prescriptions

    1 year

  • 2 or more courses of oral prednisolone prescriptions

    1 year

  • Children with second-hand smoke status recorded

    1 year

  • +2 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Paper audit and feedback only

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Provision of A\&F reports by email (standard practice in the region) to allocated practices depending on randomisation status.

Other: Provision of audit and feedback via paper only

Paper and email audit and feedback

EXPERIMENTAL

Provision of A\&F reports by paper via the post (new intervention being trialled) and email (standard practice) to allocated practices depending on randomisation status.

Other: Provision of audit and feedback via email and paper

Interventions

Provision of A\&F reports by paper via the post (new intervention being trialled) and email (standard practice) to allocated practices depending on randomisation status.

Paper and email audit and feedback

Provision of A\&F reports by email (standard practice in the region) to allocated practices depending on randomisation status.

Paper audit and feedback only

Eligibility Criteria

Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Must be a primary care practice in the West Yorkshire ICB region.
  • Must consent to data sharing, and not opted out of the West Yorkshire QIP

You may not qualify if:

  • Not a primary care practice in the West Yorkshire ICB region.
  • A primary care practice that has not consented to data sharing, or opted out of the West Yorkshire QIP

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

White Rose House

Wakefield, West Yorkshire, WF1 1LT, United Kingdom

Location

Related Publications (4)

  • Ivers NM, Sales A, Colquhoun H, Michie S, Foy R, Francis JJ, Grimshaw JM. No more 'business as usual' with audit and feedback interventions: towards an agenda for a reinvigorated intervention. Implement Sci. 2014 Jan 17;9:14. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-9-14.

    PMID: 24438584BACKGROUND
  • Ivers N, Jamtvedt G, Flottorp S, Young JM, Odgaard-Jensen J, French SD, O'Brien MA, Johansen M, Grimshaw J, Oxman AD. Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jun 13;2012(6):CD000259. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000259.pub3.

    PMID: 22696318BACKGROUND
  • Alderson SL, Farragher TM, Willis TA, Carder P, Johnson S, Foy R. The effects of an evidence- and theory-informed feedback intervention on opioid prescribing for non-cancer pain in primary care: A controlled interrupted time series analysis. PLoS Med. 2021 Oct 4;18(10):e1003796. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003796. eCollection 2021 Oct.

    PMID: 34606504BACKGROUND
  • Wood S, Foy R, Willis TA, Carder P, Johnson S, Alderson S. General practice responses to opioid prescribing feedback: a qualitative process evaluation. Br J Gen Pract. 2021 Sep 30;71(711):e788-e796. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2020.1117. Print 2021 Oct.

    PMID: 33979300BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Asthma

Interventions

Paper

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Bronchial DiseasesRespiratory Tract DiseasesLung Diseases, ObstructiveLung DiseasesRespiratory HypersensitivityHypersensitivity, ImmediateHypersensitivityImmune System Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Manufactured MaterialsTechnology, Industry, and Agriculture

Study Officials

  • Owen Thomas, MBBS

    University of Leeds

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
INVESTIGATOR
Masking Details
The research team will remain blinded to the identity of which practice has been assigned which pseudonym. However, clearly it is impossible for the ICB and the practices themselves to be blinded to the assignment status of each practice due to the nature of the intervention. The ICB will retain the process of sending out reports by email and post, as would be standard practice in such a quality improvement project.
Purpose
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: The study design is a cluster Randomised Controlled trial, where primary care practices within the NHS West Yorkshire ICB region would be randomised by Primary Care Network (PCN) to receive either paper copies of A\&F reports and emailed PDF A\&F reports, or emailed PDF A\&F reports alone. The research team will randomise (using a simple computerised Random Number Generator) each cluster of PCN practice pseudonyms to receive their audit and feedback report either by email alone, or by email and a physical copy through the post. To prevent contamination effects and for ease of analysis, cluster randomisation would be utilised on a Primary Care Network (PCN) basis. Once randomised, each practice will receive 7 A\&F reports over the course of a year in their allocated format, informing them of their progress.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principle investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 27, 2023

First Posted

March 9, 2023

Study Start

April 24, 2023

Primary Completion

May 17, 2024

Study Completion

April 17, 2025

Last Updated

January 22, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-01

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Overall data will be used to construct internal reports, support conference presentations, and peer reviewed scientific papers. Pseudo-anonymised IPD may be used to support a publication via a secure storage database.

Locations