Letters in Addition to Emailed Audit and Feedback in Refining Asthma Treatment in Primary Care
CLEARAIR
Comparing Paper Letters in Addition to Emailed Audit and Feedback in Refining Asthma Treatment to Improve Clinical and Environmental Results in Primary Care
1 other identifier
interventional
273
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Public Health England have estimated that 36,000 excess deaths occur each year due to UK air pollution. Respiratory inhalers produce 3% of NHS greenhouse gas production. The two main inhaler device categories are pressurised Metered Dose Inhalers (pMDIs) and Dry Powder Inhalers (DPIs). The chemical propellant in pMDIs is the majority cause of inhaler carbon footprint, with pMDIs having an 18 times higher carbon footprint than DPIs. The rates of asthma in the UK population are amongst the highest worldwide and its mortality rate remains amongst the worst in Europe. A pre-existing Audit and Feedback (A\&F) quality improvement project (QIP) is being undertaken by NHS West Yorkshire Integrated Care Board (ICB) with the aim of improving asthma outcomes and reducing the environmental impact of inhalers in primary care. The A\&F being utilised here has been validated locally in two peer reviewed studies and is now standard practice in the region. There is convincing evidence that A\&F has a positive effect on enacting behaviour change, especially where behaviour change is related to prescribing with low baseline compliance with guidelines. However, the evidence base is poor on which design features of A\&F produce enhanced results. There is supporting evidence from local studies suggesting that posted paper A\&F may be more effective at producing behaviour change than emailed copies of A\&F alone. This study seeks to randomise the primary care practices within the pre-arranged QIP, to receive either a paper and emailed A\&F report bimonthly for the duration of the study period, or to receive an emailed A\&F report alone. The primary outcome of the study would be a comparison of the number of 'low-global warming potential' inhalers prescribed as a percentage of the total prescribed inhalers from each intervention group.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable asthma
Started Apr 2023
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 27, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 9, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 24, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 17, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 17, 2025
CompletedJanuary 22, 2026
January 1, 2026
1.1 years
February 27, 2023
January 19, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
High-global warming potential' pMDI inhalers use
The number of 'high-global warming potential' preventer pMDI inhalers prescribed as a proportion of the total prescribed preventer inhalers for patients with asthma from each primary care practice - limited to those aged over 5.
1 year
Secondary Outcomes (7)
6 or more SABA's prescriptions
1 year
12 or more SABA's prescriptions
1 year
3 or less inhaled corticosteroids prescriptions
1 year
2 or more courses of oral prednisolone prescriptions
1 year
Children with second-hand smoke status recorded
1 year
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Paper audit and feedback only
ACTIVE COMPARATORProvision of A\&F reports by email (standard practice in the region) to allocated practices depending on randomisation status.
Paper and email audit and feedback
EXPERIMENTALProvision of A\&F reports by paper via the post (new intervention being trialled) and email (standard practice) to allocated practices depending on randomisation status.
Interventions
Provision of A\&F reports by paper via the post (new intervention being trialled) and email (standard practice) to allocated practices depending on randomisation status.
Provision of A\&F reports by email (standard practice in the region) to allocated practices depending on randomisation status.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Must be a primary care practice in the West Yorkshire ICB region.
- Must consent to data sharing, and not opted out of the West Yorkshire QIP
You may not qualify if:
- Not a primary care practice in the West Yorkshire ICB region.
- A primary care practice that has not consented to data sharing, or opted out of the West Yorkshire QIP
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Leedslead
- NHS West Yorkshire Integrated Care Boardcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
White Rose House
Wakefield, West Yorkshire, WF1 1LT, United Kingdom
Related Publications (4)
Ivers NM, Sales A, Colquhoun H, Michie S, Foy R, Francis JJ, Grimshaw JM. No more 'business as usual' with audit and feedback interventions: towards an agenda for a reinvigorated intervention. Implement Sci. 2014 Jan 17;9:14. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-9-14.
PMID: 24438584BACKGROUNDIvers N, Jamtvedt G, Flottorp S, Young JM, Odgaard-Jensen J, French SD, O'Brien MA, Johansen M, Grimshaw J, Oxman AD. Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jun 13;2012(6):CD000259. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000259.pub3.
PMID: 22696318BACKGROUNDAlderson SL, Farragher TM, Willis TA, Carder P, Johnson S, Foy R. The effects of an evidence- and theory-informed feedback intervention on opioid prescribing for non-cancer pain in primary care: A controlled interrupted time series analysis. PLoS Med. 2021 Oct 4;18(10):e1003796. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003796. eCollection 2021 Oct.
PMID: 34606504BACKGROUNDWood S, Foy R, Willis TA, Carder P, Johnson S, Alderson S. General practice responses to opioid prescribing feedback: a qualitative process evaluation. Br J Gen Pract. 2021 Sep 30;71(711):e788-e796. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2020.1117. Print 2021 Oct.
PMID: 33979300BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Owen Thomas, MBBS
University of Leeds
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR
- Masking Details
- The research team will remain blinded to the identity of which practice has been assigned which pseudonym. However, clearly it is impossible for the ICB and the practices themselves to be blinded to the assignment status of each practice due to the nature of the intervention. The ICB will retain the process of sending out reports by email and post, as would be standard practice in such a quality improvement project.
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principle investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 27, 2023
First Posted
March 9, 2023
Study Start
April 24, 2023
Primary Completion
May 17, 2024
Study Completion
April 17, 2025
Last Updated
January 22, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Overall data will be used to construct internal reports, support conference presentations, and peer reviewed scientific papers. Pseudo-anonymised IPD may be used to support a publication via a secure storage database.