Appropriate Prescribing for Older Adults With Multimorbidity (Pro-M)
Pro-M
1 other identifier
interventional
36
1 country
2
Brief Summary
This is a two-site feasibility study to test implementation of an intervention that aims to reduce inappropriate prescribing for older adults with multimorbidity in geriatric medicine specialist clinics at public hospitals in Singapore. The specific aims are:
- 1.To assess the implementation outcomes: Appropriateness, Penetration/Reach, Acceptability, Feasibility, Sustainability (primary)
- 2.To collect data on recruitment and pre-post data on prevalence of potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) for the purpose of determining sample size for a scale up next phase study (secondary).
- 3.To conduct cost analysis of the intervention (secondary).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2023
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 30, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 6, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 16, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 16, 2023
CompletedFebruary 9, 2024
February 1, 2024
9 months
January 30, 2023
February 8, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (6)
Patients' attitudes towards acceptance of the intervention (Penetration/Reach)
The survey consists of 11 items, and each item is on a 5-point Likert scale (level of agreement). This is a mixed method implementation study that is focused on investigating the feasibility of implementing medication reviews as routine care for older adults with multimorbidity in the outpatient clinics. The first 6 months will be the implementation period, followed by a 3-month evaluation period that consists of a first survey of the implementers (doctors and pharmacists), then an in-depth interview with selected implementers.
A single-time-point survey to be administered immediately after the intervention
Implementers' attitudes towards the appropriateness of the intervention
The survey consists of 25 items, and each item is measured on a 5-point Likert (level of agreement). This is a mixed method implementation study that is focused on investigating the feasibility of implementing medication reviews as routine care for older adults with multimorbidity in the outpatient clinics. The first 6 months will be the implementation period, followed by a 3-month evaluation period that consists of a survey of the implementers (doctors and pharmacists), then an in-depth interview with selected implementers.
3-month Evaluation period: A single-time-point survey to be conducted immediately after the 6-month implementation period. Selected in-depth interviews will follow to provide a qualitative context to the survey results.
Implementers' attitudes towards the acceptability of the intervention
The survey consists of 25 items, and each item is measured on a 5-point Likert (level of agreement). This is a mixed method implementation study that is focused on investigating the feasibility of implementing medication reviews as routine care for older adults with multimorbidity in the outpatient clinics. The first 6 months will be the implementation period, followed by a 3-month evaluation period that consists of a survey of the implementers (doctors and pharmacists), then an in-depth interview with selected implementers.
3-month Evaluation period: A single-time-point survey to be conducted immediately after the 6-month implementation period. Selected in-depth interviews will follow to provide a qualitative context to the survey results.
Implementers' attitudes towards the feasibility of the intervention.
The survey consists of 25 items, and each item is measured on a 5-point Likert (level of agreement). This is a mixed method implementation study that is focused on investigating the feasibility of implementing medication reviews as routine care for older adults with multimorbidity in the outpatient clinics. The first 6 months will be the implementation period, followed by a 3-month evaluation period that consists of a survey of the implementers (doctors and pharmacists), then an in-depth interview with selected implementers.
3-month Evaluation period: A single-time-point survey to be conducted immediately after the 6-month implementation period. Selected in-depth interviews will follow to provide a qualitative context to the survey results.
Implementers' attitudes towards the sustainability of the intervention.
The survey consists of 25 items, and each item is measured on a 5-point Likert (level of agreement). This is a mixed method implementation study that is focused on investigating the feasibility of implementing medication reviews as routine care for older adults with multimorbidity in the outpatient clinics. The first 6 months will be the implementation period, followed by a 3-month evaluation period that consists of a survey of the implementers (doctors and pharmacists), then an in-depth interview with selected implementers.
3-month Evaluation period: A single-time-point survey to be conducted immediately after the 6-month implementation period. Selected in-depth interviews will follow to provide a qualitative context to the survey results.
Implementers' views on the fidelity of the intervention.
The survey consists of 25 items, and each item is measured on a 5-point Likert (level of agreement). This is a mixed method implementation study that is focused on investigating the feasibility of implementing medication reviews as routine care for older adults with multimorbidity in the outpatient clinics. The first 6 months will be the implementation period, followed by a 3-month evaluation period that consists of a survey of the implementers (doctors and pharmacists), then an in-depth interview with selected implementers.
:3-month Evaluation period: A single-time-point survey to be conducted immediately after the 6-month implementation period. Selected in-depth interviews will follow to provide a qualitative context to the survey results.
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Recruitment rate
6 months during implementation period
Effectiveness of the intervention: Percentage of patients with at least one PIM before and after intervention.
6 months during implementation period
Effectiveness of the intervention: Percentage of patients with other medication issues identified before and after intervention.
6 months during implementation period
Manpower cost to conduct medication review
6 months during implementation period
Cost of PIM and other medications with issues identified before and after medication review.
6 months during implementation period
Study Arms (1)
Medication Review
OTHERThis is a feasibility study of implementing a pharmacist-led medication review using prescribing tools (e.g. STOPP/START, Beers Criteria) .
Interventions
This is a feasibility study of implementing a pharmacist-led medication review using prescribing tools (e.g. STOPP/START, Beers Criteria)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Older adults age 65 and above
- Currently attending Geriatric Medicine Clinic
- on at least 5 medications.
You may not qualify if:
- Those younger than 65
- Not a Geriatric Medicine outpatient clinic patient
- On fewer than 5 medications
- Currently receiving other pharmacist-related services such as medication therapy management.
- Non-English, non-Chinese, and non-Malay speaking patients.
- Patient or caregiver who declines any of the study procedure required within the intervention framework.
- Doctors and pharmacists
- who are involved in the delivery or support of the intervention during the implementation period.
- Those who are not involved in the implementation of the study.
- Those who are not involved in the delivery of the intervention.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Geriatric Education and Research Institutelead
- Tan Tock Seng Hospitalcollaborator
- Changi General Hospitalcollaborator
Study Sites (2)
Changi General Hospital
Singapore, Sinagpore, 529889, Singapore
Tan Tock Seng Hospital
Singapore, 308440, Singapore
Related Publications (1)
Tang JY, Teng PHJ, Chen CY, Tan KT, Ang W, Lau S, Ang AGC, Kyaw KK, Tay XY, Lim WMS, Espeleta WDV, Lin H, Ding YY, Lun P. Appropriate Prescribing for older adults with Multimorbidity (Pro-M): protocol for a feasibility study. Arch Public Health. 2024 Mar 18;82(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s13690-024-01264-x.
PMID: 38500190DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Penny Lun, M.A.
Geriatric Education and Research Institute, Singapore
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 30, 2023
First Posted
March 6, 2023
Study Start
February 1, 2023
Primary Completion
October 16, 2023
Study Completion
October 16, 2023
Last Updated
February 9, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-02