Validation of ECG Waveform and Arrhythmia Diagnosis Concordance for Pediatric Patients Using ECG Monitoring Patch
Validation of Electrocardiogram Waveform, Heart Rate Accuracy and Arrhythmia Diagnosis Concordance for Pediatric Patients Using Single-channel ECG Monitoring Patch and Holter Monitoring
1 other identifier
interventional
105
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study will verify the 1-channel patch-type ECG's arrhythmia diagnostic concordance rate and electrocardiogram measurement performance in pediatric patients by collecting ECG signals from patch-type ECG and Holter device simultaneously for data analysis.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2023
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 16, 2023
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 13, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 6, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 30, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 30, 2024
CompletedAugust 9, 2024
August 1, 2024
2 years
February 13, 2023
August 6, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Rate of arrhythmia diagnosis between patch-type electrocardiograph and commercial Holter device measurement data by arrhythmia categories
Rate of arrhythmia diagnosis between 24-hour patch-type electrocardiograph and commercial Holter device measurement data by arrhythmia categories(total of 19 including ventricular ectopic beat)
Within 3 months after electrocardiogram procedure
Rate of ECG signal concordance between patch-type electrocardiograph and holter device
Calculate the concordance (%) of the ECG signal by comparing and analyzing total QRS complex, total ventricular ectopic beats, total atrial ectopic beats, minimum heart rate(bpm), maximum heart rate(bpm), average heart rate(bpm) and maximum RR interval(ms)
Within 3 months after electrocardiogram procedure
Study Arms (1)
Electrocardiogram measurements by holter device and patch-type electrocardiographic at the same time
EXPERIMENTALThe patient is measured electrocardiogram simultaneously through a holter device and patch-type electrocardiograph
Interventions
The patient is measured electrocardiogram simultaneously through a holter device and patch-type electrocardiograph
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- More than 29 days old and less than 19 years old
- Patients who are need regular Holter electrocardiography among outpatients or hospitalized patients at the Pediatrics, Samsung Medical Center
- Those who gave written consent to this clinical study or obtained the written consent of the legal representative
You may not qualify if:
- Patients who cannot give consent through the patient ownself or legal representative
- If the researcher judges that participation in this study is inappropriate for other reasons
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Mezoo Co., Ltd.lead
Study Sites (1)
Samsung Medical Center
Seoul, South Korea
Related Publications (7)
Rajbhandary PL, Nallathambi G, Selvaraj N, Tran T, Colliou O. ECG Signal Quality Assessments of a Small Bipolar Single-Lead Wearable Patch Sensor. Cardiovasc Eng Technol. 2022 Oct;13(5):783-796. doi: 10.1007/s13239-022-00617-3. Epub 2022 Mar 15.
PMID: 35292914BACKGROUNDKancharla K, Estes NAM. Mobile cardiac monitoring during the COVID-19 pandemic: Necessity is the mother of invention. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2020 Nov;31(11):2812-2813. doi: 10.1111/jce.14726. Epub 2020 Sep 3. No abstract available.
PMID: 32852854BACKGROUNDFung E, Jarvelin MR, Doshi RN, Shinbane JS, Carlson SK, Grazette LP, Chang PM, Sangha RS, Huikuri HV, Peters NS. Electrocardiographic patch devices and contemporary wireless cardiac monitoring. Front Physiol. 2015 May 27;6:149. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2015.00149. eCollection 2015.
PMID: 26074823BACKGROUNDKennedy HL. The evolution of ambulatory ECG monitoring. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2013 Sep-Oct;56(2):127-32. doi: 10.1016/j.pcad.2013.08.005. Epub 2013 Sep 11.
PMID: 24215744BACKGROUNDGarson A Jr. Arrhythmias in pediatric patients. Med Clin North Am. 1984 Sep;68(5):1171-210. doi: 10.1016/s0025-7125(16)31091-4.
PMID: 6492933BACKGROUNDSolomon MD, Yang J, Sung SH, Livingston ML, Sarlas G, Lenane JC, Go AS. Incidence and timing of potentially high-risk arrhythmias detected through long term continuous ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2016 Feb 17;16:35. doi: 10.1186/s12872-016-0210-x.
PMID: 26883019BACKGROUNDYenikomshian M, Jarvis J, Patton C, Yee C, Mortimer R, Birnbaum H, Topash M. Cardiac arrhythmia detection outcomes among patients monitored with the Zio patch system: a systematic literature review. Curr Med Res Opin. 2019 Oct;35(10):1659-1670. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2019.1610370. Epub 2019 May 28.
PMID: 31045463BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Junghwan Park
CEO
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 13, 2023
First Posted
March 6, 2023
Study Start
January 16, 2023
Primary Completion
December 30, 2024
Study Completion
December 30, 2024
Last Updated
August 9, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share