Validation of ECG Waveform and Arrhythmia Diagnosis Concordance Using ECG Monitoring Patch and Holter Monitoring
Validation of Electrocardiogram Waveform, Heart Rate Accuracy and Arrhythmia Diagnosis Concordance in Patients With Cardiac Arrhythmia Using Single-channel ECG Monitoring Patch and Holter Monitoring
1 other identifier
interventional
105
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study will verify the 1-channel patch-type ECG's arrhythmia diagnostic concordance rate and electrocardiogram measurement performance by collecting ECG signals from patch-type ECG and Holter device simultaneously for data analysis.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2023
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 6, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 8, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 24, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 30, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 30, 2023
CompletedAugust 7, 2024
August 1, 2024
9 months
February 6, 2023
August 6, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Comparison of arrhythmia diagnosis concordance rates between patch-type electrocardiograph and commercial Holter device measurement data by arrhythmia categories
Comparison of arrhythmia diagnosis concordance rates between 24-hour patch-type electrocardiograph and commercial Holter device measurement data by arrhythmia categories(total of 19 including ventricular ectopic beat)
Within 3 months after electrocardiogram procedure
Comparison of ECG signal concordance between patch-type electrocardiograph and holter device
Calculate the concordance (%) of the ECG signal by comparing and analyzing total QRS complex, total ventricular ectopic beat, total atrial ectopic beats, minimum heart rate, maximum heart rate, average heart rate and maximum RR interval
Within 3 months after electrocardiogram procedure
Study Arms (1)
Electrocardiogram measurements by holter device and patch-type electrocardiographic at the same time
EXPERIMENTALThe patient is measured electrocardiogram simultaneously through a holter device and patch-type electrocardiograph
Interventions
The patient is measured electrocardiogram simultaneously through a holter device and patch-type electrocardiograph
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adults 19 years of age or older
- Patients who are diagnosed with arrhythmia and need regular Holter electrocardiography among outpatients or hospitalized patients at the Department of Cardiology, Kosin University Gospel Hospital
- Those who gave written consent to this clinical study
- Able to understand and carry out training and instructions
You may not qualify if:
- A person with a physical disability that cannot wear a patch-type electrocardiograph
- A person suffering from skin disease or functional disorder at the site where the patch-type electrocardiograph will be attached
- Subjects who cannot read the consent form (illiterate, foreigners, etc.)
- Patients judged to be unsuitable for participation in this clinical study by the judgment of investigators
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Mezoo Co., Ltd.lead
Study Sites (1)
Kosin University Gospel Hospital
Busan, South Korea
Related Publications (8)
Rajbhandary PL, Nallathambi G, Selvaraj N, Tran T, Colliou O. ECG Signal Quality Assessments of a Small Bipolar Single-Lead Wearable Patch Sensor. Cardiovasc Eng Technol. 2022 Oct;13(5):783-796. doi: 10.1007/s13239-022-00617-3. Epub 2022 Mar 15.
PMID: 35292914BACKGROUNDYenikomshian M, Jarvis J, Patton C, Yee C, Mortimer R, Birnbaum H, Topash M. Cardiac arrhythmia detection outcomes among patients monitored with the Zio patch system: a systematic literature review. Curr Med Res Opin. 2019 Oct;35(10):1659-1670. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2019.1610370. Epub 2019 May 28.
PMID: 31045463BACKGROUNDFung E, Jarvelin MR, Doshi RN, Shinbane JS, Carlson SK, Grazette LP, Chang PM, Sangha RS, Huikuri HV, Peters NS. Electrocardiographic patch devices and contemporary wireless cardiac monitoring. Front Physiol. 2015 May 27;6:149. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2015.00149. eCollection 2015.
PMID: 26074823BACKGROUNDLiu CM, Chang SL, Yeh YH, Chung FP, Hu YF, Chou CC, Hung KC, Chang PC, Liao JN, Chan YH, Lo LW, Wu LS, Lin YJ, Wen MS, Chen SA. Enhanced detection of cardiac arrhythmias utilizing 14-day continuous ECG patch monitoring. Int J Cardiol. 2021 Jun 1;332:78-84. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2021.03.015. Epub 2021 Mar 13.
PMID: 33727122BACKGROUNDSolomon MD, Yang J, Sung SH, Livingston ML, Sarlas G, Lenane JC, Go AS. Incidence and timing of potentially high-risk arrhythmias detected through long term continuous ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2016 Feb 17;16:35. doi: 10.1186/s12872-016-0210-x.
PMID: 26883019BACKGROUNDKancharla K, Estes NAM. Mobile cardiac monitoring during the COVID-19 pandemic: Necessity is the mother of invention. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2020 Nov;31(11):2812-2813. doi: 10.1111/jce.14726. Epub 2020 Sep 3. No abstract available.
PMID: 32852854BACKGROUNDXia H, Garcia GA, Zhao X. Automatic detection of ECG electrode misplacement: a tale of two algorithms. Physiol Meas. 2012 Sep;33(9):1549-61. doi: 10.1088/0967-3334/33/9/1549. Epub 2012 Aug 17.
PMID: 22903067BACKGROUNDKrahn AD, Klein GJ, Yee R, Skanes AC. Detection of asymptomatic arrhythmias in unexplained syncope. Am Heart J. 2004 Aug;148(2):326-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2004.01.024.
PMID: 15309004BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
JH Park
CEO
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 6, 2023
First Posted
February 24, 2023
Study Start
February 8, 2023
Primary Completion
October 30, 2023
Study Completion
October 30, 2023
Last Updated
August 7, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share