NCT05744206

Brief Summary

This study will verify the 1-channel patch-type ECG's arrhythmia diagnostic concordance rate and electrocardiogram measurement performance by collecting ECG signals from patch-type ECG and Holter device simultaneously for data analysis.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
105

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2023

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 6, 2023

Completed
2 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 8, 2023

Completed
16 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 24, 2023

Completed
8 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 30, 2023

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 30, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

August 7, 2024

Status Verified

August 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

9 months

First QC Date

February 6, 2023

Last Update Submit

August 6, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

ECG monitoring patchValidation of Electrocardiogram waveformValidation of heart rate accuracyValidation of arrhythmia diagnosis concordancePatients with cardiac arrhythmiaHolterWearable patch-type electrocardiograph

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Comparison of arrhythmia diagnosis concordance rates between patch-type electrocardiograph and commercial Holter device measurement data by arrhythmia categories

    Comparison of arrhythmia diagnosis concordance rates between 24-hour patch-type electrocardiograph and commercial Holter device measurement data by arrhythmia categories(total of 19 including ventricular ectopic beat)

    Within 3 months after electrocardiogram procedure

  • Comparison of ECG signal concordance between patch-type electrocardiograph and holter device

    Calculate the concordance (%) of the ECG signal by comparing and analyzing total QRS complex, total ventricular ectopic beat, total atrial ectopic beats, minimum heart rate, maximum heart rate, average heart rate and maximum RR interval

    Within 3 months after electrocardiogram procedure

Study Arms (1)

Electrocardiogram measurements by holter device and patch-type electrocardiographic at the same time

EXPERIMENTAL

The patient is measured electrocardiogram simultaneously through a holter device and patch-type electrocardiograph

Other: Electrocardiogram measurements by holter device and patch-type electrocardiographic at the same time

Interventions

The patient is measured electrocardiogram simultaneously through a holter device and patch-type electrocardiograph

Electrocardiogram measurements by holter device and patch-type electrocardiographic at the same time

Eligibility Criteria

Age19 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Adults 19 years of age or older
  • Patients who are diagnosed with arrhythmia and need regular Holter electrocardiography among outpatients or hospitalized patients at the Department of Cardiology, Kosin University Gospel Hospital
  • Those who gave written consent to this clinical study
  • Able to understand and carry out training and instructions

You may not qualify if:

  • A person with a physical disability that cannot wear a patch-type electrocardiograph
  • A person suffering from skin disease or functional disorder at the site where the patch-type electrocardiograph will be attached
  • Subjects who cannot read the consent form (illiterate, foreigners, etc.)
  • Patients judged to be unsuitable for participation in this clinical study by the judgment of investigators

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Kosin University Gospel Hospital

Busan, South Korea

Location

Related Publications (8)

  • Rajbhandary PL, Nallathambi G, Selvaraj N, Tran T, Colliou O. ECG Signal Quality Assessments of a Small Bipolar Single-Lead Wearable Patch Sensor. Cardiovasc Eng Technol. 2022 Oct;13(5):783-796. doi: 10.1007/s13239-022-00617-3. Epub 2022 Mar 15.

    PMID: 35292914BACKGROUND
  • Yenikomshian M, Jarvis J, Patton C, Yee C, Mortimer R, Birnbaum H, Topash M. Cardiac arrhythmia detection outcomes among patients monitored with the Zio patch system: a systematic literature review. Curr Med Res Opin. 2019 Oct;35(10):1659-1670. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2019.1610370. Epub 2019 May 28.

    PMID: 31045463BACKGROUND
  • Fung E, Jarvelin MR, Doshi RN, Shinbane JS, Carlson SK, Grazette LP, Chang PM, Sangha RS, Huikuri HV, Peters NS. Electrocardiographic patch devices and contemporary wireless cardiac monitoring. Front Physiol. 2015 May 27;6:149. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2015.00149. eCollection 2015.

    PMID: 26074823BACKGROUND
  • Liu CM, Chang SL, Yeh YH, Chung FP, Hu YF, Chou CC, Hung KC, Chang PC, Liao JN, Chan YH, Lo LW, Wu LS, Lin YJ, Wen MS, Chen SA. Enhanced detection of cardiac arrhythmias utilizing 14-day continuous ECG patch monitoring. Int J Cardiol. 2021 Jun 1;332:78-84. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2021.03.015. Epub 2021 Mar 13.

    PMID: 33727122BACKGROUND
  • Solomon MD, Yang J, Sung SH, Livingston ML, Sarlas G, Lenane JC, Go AS. Incidence and timing of potentially high-risk arrhythmias detected through long term continuous ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2016 Feb 17;16:35. doi: 10.1186/s12872-016-0210-x.

    PMID: 26883019BACKGROUND
  • Kancharla K, Estes NAM. Mobile cardiac monitoring during the COVID-19 pandemic: Necessity is the mother of invention. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2020 Nov;31(11):2812-2813. doi: 10.1111/jce.14726. Epub 2020 Sep 3. No abstract available.

    PMID: 32852854BACKGROUND
  • Xia H, Garcia GA, Zhao X. Automatic detection of ECG electrode misplacement: a tale of two algorithms. Physiol Meas. 2012 Sep;33(9):1549-61. doi: 10.1088/0967-3334/33/9/1549. Epub 2012 Aug 17.

    PMID: 22903067BACKGROUND
  • Krahn AD, Klein GJ, Yee R, Skanes AC. Detection of asymptomatic arrhythmias in unexplained syncope. Am Heart J. 2004 Aug;148(2):326-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2004.01.024.

    PMID: 15309004BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Arrhythmias, Cardiac

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Heart DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • JH Park

    CEO

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 6, 2023

First Posted

February 24, 2023

Study Start

February 8, 2023

Primary Completion

October 30, 2023

Study Completion

October 30, 2023

Last Updated

August 7, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-08

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations