Comparison of CE-DBT and MRI in Patients With Known Breast Lesions
Comparison of Contrast Enhanced Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients With Known Breast Lesions
1 other identifier
interventional
20
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this pilot study is to compare radiologist confidence level in evaluating patients with known breast lesions between contrast enhanced digital breast tomosynthesis (CE- DBT) and contrast enhanced dynamic magnetic resonance imaging (CE-MRI) acquired as a part of a standard clinical workup.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for early_phase_1 breast-cancer
Started Mar 2023
Typical duration for early_phase_1 breast-cancer
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 21, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 6, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 13, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 22, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 22, 2026
September 25, 2025
September 1, 2025
3.4 years
February 21, 2023
September 23, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Reader confidence in identifying lesions on CE-DBT compared to contrast enhanced dynamic breast MRI (arbitrary units)
To compare (using a reader study) the reader confidence in identifying lesions on CE-DBT to the reader confidence in identifying lesions on contrast enhanced dynamic breast MRI.
Calculated once all imaging is complete [Anticipated 1.5 years]
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Contrast enhancement curves of CE-DBT compared to conventional MRI (arbitrary units)
Calculated once all imaging is complete [Anticipated 1.5 years]
Diagnostic accuracy of CE-DBT compared to contrast enhanced dynamic breast MRI (arbitrary units)
Calculated once all imaging is complete [Anticipated 1.5 years]
Sensitivity of CE-DBT compared to contrast enhanced dynamic breast MRI (arbitrary units)
Calculated once all imaging is complete [Anticipated 1.5 years]
Specificity of CE-DBT compared to contrast enhanced dynamic breast MRI (arbitrary units)
Calculated once all imaging is complete [Anticipated 1.5 years]
Positivity predictive value of CE-DBT compared to contrast enhanced dynamic breast MRI (arbitrary units)
Calculated once all imaging is complete [Anticipated 1.5 years]
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Contrast-enhanced digital breast tomosynthesis (CE-DBT)
EXPERIMENTALParticipants with known breast lesions will be imaged using contrast-enhanced digital breast tomosynthesis (CE-DBT) with Iohexol 350 mg I/mL.
Interventions
Participants will be scanned with the digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) system before and after the intravenous administration of iodinated contrast agent, iohexol 350mg I/mL at a dose of 1.5 mL/kg body weight. Images will be acquired of the breast of interest prior to the administration of contrast, followed by at approximately 2 minutes and 5 minutes after administration. For the purposes of this study, imaging will focus on a single breast to simplify data acquisition.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Women at least 18 years old
- Planned or received conventional breast MRI at UNC Hospitals within 3 months prior to or after the research scan
- Suspected breast lesion based on prior imaging (BIRADS 4 or greater)
- Able to provide written informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Severe untreatable claustrophobia
- Implanted metallic devices, parts, vascular clips, or other foreign bodies (including breast implants)
- Known hypersensitivity to iodinated contrast agent or to any component of iodinated contrast refractory to standard medications (antihistamines, steroids)
- Impaired kidney function (serum creatinine level \> 1.8 mg/dl or a glomerular filtration rate \< 60 as approximated using serum creatinine levels within the last 30 days prior to the research scan) unless anuric and on dialysis
- Any woman who is pregnant or has reason to believe she is pregnant (the possibility of pregnancy has to be excluded by negative urine β-HCG results, obtained within 24 hours prior to the research scan, or on the basis of patient history, as defined by the UNC IRB SOP 4801)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Rachel Hitt, MD
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- early phase 1
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 21, 2023
First Posted
March 6, 2023
Study Start
March 13, 2023
Primary Completion (Estimated)
August 22, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
August 22, 2026
Last Updated
September 25, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL
- Time Frame
- 9 to 36 months following publication
- Access Criteria
- The investigator who proposes to use the data has approval from an IRB, IEC, or REB, as applicable, and an executed data use/sharing agreement with UNC.
Deidentified individual data that supports the results will be shared beginning 9 to 36 months following publication provided the investigator who proposes to use the data has approval from an Institutional Review Board (IRB), Independent Ethics Committee (IEC), or Research Ethics Board (REB), as applicable, and executes a data use/sharing agreement with UNC.