Shockwave, Photobiomodulation, and Physical Therapy for Achilles Tendinopathy
Investigation of the Effectiveness of Shockwave Therapy, Photobiomodulation, and Physical Therapy in the Management of Non-insertional Achilles Tendinopathy
1 other identifier
interventional
48
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn more about and compare the effectiveness of standard of care (SOC) physical therapy (PT), PT with photobiomodulation therapy (PBMT; low-level laser therapy), PT with shockwave therapy (SWT; high-energy acoustic wave therapy), and PT with PBMT and SWT, to improve function, decrease pain, and resolve symptoms in individuals with non-insertional Achilles tendinopathy. The main question it aims to answer is: • What is the most effective treatment method for non-insertional Achilles tendinopathy? Participants will Researchers will compare PT, PT + SWT, PT + SWT and PBMT to assess the most effective treatment for Achilles tendinopathy.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2023
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 27, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 13, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 2, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 14, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 14, 2024
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
July 22, 2025
CompletedJuly 22, 2025
July 1, 2025
1.8 years
January 27, 2023
January 15, 2025
July 1, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (49)
Victorian Institute of Sports Assessment - Achilles (VISA-A)
The VISA-A (Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment - Achilles) is a questionnaire designed to assess the severity of Achilles tendinopathy. It consists of eight questions that evaluate pain, function in daily life, and sports activities. The minimum score is 0 and the maximum score is 100, with lower scores indicating more severe symptoms and limitations
Baseline
Victorian Institute of Sports Assessment - Achilles (VISA-A)
The VISA-A (Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment - Achilles) is a questionnaire designed to assess the severity of Achilles tendinopathy. It consists of eight questions that evaluate pain, function in daily life, and sports activities. The minimum score is 0 and the maximum score is 100, with lower scores indicating more severe symptoms and limitations
3-week
Victorian Institute of Sports Assessment - Achilles (VISA-A)
The VISA-A (Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment - Achilles) is a questionnaire designed to assess the severity of Achilles tendinopathy. It consists of eight questions that evaluate pain, function in daily life, and sports activities. The minimum score is 0 and the maximum score is 100, with lower scores indicating more severe symptoms and limitations.
6-week
Victorian Institute of Sports Assessment - Achilles (VISA-A)
The VISA-A (Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment - Achilles) is a questionnaire designed to assess the severity of Achilles tendinopathy. It consists of eight questions that evaluate pain, function in daily life, and sports activities. The minimum score is 0 and the maximum score is 100, with lower scores indicating more severe symptoms and limitations
12-week
Victorian Institute of Sports Assessment - Achilles (VISA-A)
The VISA-A (Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment - Achilles) is a questionnaire designed to assess the severity of Achilles tendinopathy. It consists of eight questions that evaluate pain, function in daily life, and sports activities. The minimum score is 0 and the maximum score is 100, with lower scores indicating more severe symptoms and limitations
6-month
Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS)
The Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) is a questionnaire used to assess a person's ability to perform everyday activities involving the lower limbs. It consists of 20 questions, each scored from 0 to 4, with a minimum score of 0 and maximum total score of 80. Key Points: Higher scores indicate better lower extremity function. Lower scores suggest greater disability or difficulty in movement.
Baseline
Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS)
The Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) is a questionnaire used to assess a person's ability to perform everyday activities involving the lower limbs. It consists of 20 questions, each scored from 0 to 4, with a minimum score of 0 and maximum total score of 80. Key Points: Higher scores indicate better lower extremity function. Lower scores suggest greater disability or difficulty in movement.
3-week
Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS)
The Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) is a questionnaire used to assess a person's ability to perform everyday activities involving the lower limbs. It consists of 20 questions, each scored from 0 to 4, with a minimum score of 0 and maximum total score of 80. Key Points: Higher scores indicate better lower extremity function. Lower scores suggest greater disability or difficulty in movement.
6-week
Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS)
The Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) is a questionnaire used to assess a person's ability to perform everyday activities involving the lower limbs. It consists of 20 questions, each scored from 0 to 4, with a minimum score of 0 and maximum total score of 80. Key Points: Higher scores indicate better lower extremity function. Lower scores suggest greater disability or difficulty in movement.
12-week
Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS)
The Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) is a questionnaire used to assess a person's ability to perform everyday activities involving the lower limbs. It consists of 20 questions, each scored from 0 to 4, with a minimum score of 0 and maximum total score of 80. Key Points: Higher scores indicate better lower extremity function. Lower scores suggest greater disability or difficulty in movement.
6-month
Defense and Veteran's Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS)
The Defense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS) is a pain assessment tool designed specifically for military personnel and veterans Rating scale from 0-10. Higher scores equal worse outcomes.
Baseline
Defense and Veteran's Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS)
The Defense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS) is a pain assessment tool designed specifically for military personnel and veterans Rating scale from 0-10. Higher scores equal worse outcomes.
3-week
Defense and Veteran's Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS)
The Defense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS) is a pain assessment tool designed specifically for military personnel and veterans Rating scale from 0-10. Higher scores equal worse outcomes.
6-week
Defense and Veteran's Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS)
The Defense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS) is a pain assessment tool designed specifically for military personnel and veterans Rating scale from 0-10. Higher scores equal worse outcomes.
12-week
Defense and Veteran's Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS)
The Defense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS) is a pain assessment tool designed specifically for military personnel and veterans Rating scale from 0-10. Higher scores equal worse outcomes.
6-month
University of Wisconsin Running Injury and Recovery Index (UWRI)
The University of Wisconsin Running Injury and Recovery Index (UWRI) is a questionnaire designed to assess a runner's recovery from running-related injuries. Scores range from 0-36, with higher scores equaling better outcomes.
Baseline
University of Wisconsin Running Injury and Recovery Index (UWRI)
The University of Wisconsin Running Injury and Recovery Index (UWRI) is a questionnaire designed to assess a runner's recovery from running-related injuries. Scores range from 0-36, with higher scores equaling better outcomes.
3-week
University of Wisconsin Running Injury and Recovery Index (UWRI)
The University of Wisconsin Running Injury and Recovery Index (UWRI) is a questionnaire designed to assess a runner's recovery from running-related injuries. Scores range from 0-36, with higher scores equaling better outcomes.
6-week
University of Wisconsin Running Injury and Recovery Index (UWRI)
The University of Wisconsin Running Injury and Recovery Index (UWRI) is a questionnaire designed to assess a runner's recovery from running-related injuries. Scores range from 0-36, with higher scores equaling better outcomes.
12-week
University of Wisconsin Running Injury and Recovery Index (UWRI)
The University of Wisconsin Running Injury and Recovery Index (UWRI) is a questionnaire designed to assess a runner's recovery from running-related injuries. Scores range from 0-36, with higher scores equaling better outcomes.
6-month
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29)
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) has seven categories: Physical Function (higher scores = better function), Anxiety (higher scores = more anxiety), Depression (higher scores = more depression), Fatigue (higher scores = more fatigue), Sleep Disturbance (higher scores = more disturbance during sleep), Pain (higher scores = more pain), and Social Function (higher scores = more socialization). Minimum score is 20 and maximum is 80 for each of the seven categories.
Baseline
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29)
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) has seven categories: Physical Function (higher scores = better function), Anxiety (higher scores = more anxiety), Depression (higher scores = more depression), Fatigue (higher scores = more fatigue), Sleep Disturbance (higher scores = more disturbance during sleep), Pain (higher scores = more pain), and Social Function (higher scores = more socialization). Minimum score is 20 and maximum is 80 for each of the seven categories.
3-week
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29)
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) has seven categories: Physical Function (higher scores = better function), Anxiety (higher scores = more anxiety), Depression (higher scores = more depression), Fatigue (higher scores = more fatigue), Sleep Disturbance (higher scores = more disturbance during sleep), Pain (higher scores = more pain), and Social Function (higher scores = more socialization). Minimum score is 20 and maximum is 80 for each of the seven categories.
6-week
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29)
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) has seven categories: Physical Function (higher scores = better function), Anxiety (higher scores = more anxiety), Depression (higher scores = more depression), Fatigue (higher scores = more fatigue), Sleep Disturbance (higher scores = more disturbance during sleep), Pain (higher scores = more pain), and Social Function (higher scores = more socialization). Minimum score is 20 and maximum is 80 for each of the seven categories.
12-week
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29)
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) has seven categories: Physical Function (higher scores = better function), Anxiety (higher scores = more anxiety), Depression (higher scores = more depression), Fatigue (higher scores = more fatigue), Sleep Disturbance (higher scores = more disturbance during sleep), Pain (higher scores = more pain), and Social Function (higher scores = more socialization). Minimum score is 20 and maximum is 80 for each of the seven categories.
6-month
Cross-sectional Area
Measures of interest include cross-sectional area. A study team member will assess ultrasound measures at baseline for both limbs, measured in centimeters (cm).
Baseline
Cross-sectional Area
Measures of interest include cross-sectional area. A study team member will assess ultrasound measures at 12 weeks for both limbs, measured in centimeters (cm).
12-week
Cross Sectional Area
Measures of interest include cross-sectional area. A study team member will assess ultrasound measures at 6 months for both limbs, measured in centimeters (cm).
6-month
Width
Measures of interest include width of tendon. A study team member will assess ultrasound measures at baseline for both limbs, measured in centimeters (cm).
Baseline
Width
Measures of interest include width of tendon. A study team member will assess ultrasound measures at 12 weeks for both limbs, measured in centimeters (cm).
12-week
Width
Measures of interest include width of tendon. A study team member will assess ultrasound measures at 6 months for both limbs, measured in centimeters (cm).
6-month
Degree of Thickening
Measures of interest include degree of thickening of tendon. A study team member will assess ultrasound measures at baseline for both limbs, measured in centimeters (cm).
Baseline
Degree of Thickening
Measures of interest include degree of thickening of tendon. A study team member will assess ultrasound measures at 12 weeks for both limbs, measured in centimeters (cm).
12-week
Degree of Thickening
Measures of interest include degree of thickening of tendon. A study team member will assess ultrasound measures at 6 months for both limbs, measured in centimeters (cm).
6-month
Relative Neovascularity
Measures of interest include relative neovascularity. A study team member will assess ultrasound measures at baseline for both limbs. The relative level of neovascularization will be rated from grade 0: no visible vessels, grade 1: 1 to 2 vessels within the region of interest, grade 2: 3 to 5 vessels within the region of interest (ROI), or grade 3: vessel's in up to 30% of the ROI.
Baseline
Relative Neovascularity
Measures of interest include relative neovascularity. A study team member will assess ultrasound measures at 12 weeks for both limbs. The relative level of neovascularization will be rated from grade 0: no visible vessels, grade 1: 1 to 2 vessels within the region of interest, grade 2: 3 to 5 vessels within the region of interest (ROI), or grade 3: vessel's in up to 30% of the ROI.
12-week
Relative Neovascularity
Measures of interest include relative neovascularity. A study team member will assess ultrasound measures at 6 months for both limbs. The relative level of neovascularization will be rated from grade 0: no visible vessels, grade 2: 3 to 5 vessels within the region of interest (ROI), grade 3: vessel's in up to 30% of the ROI
6-months
Elastography
Measures of interest include elastography. A study team member will assess ultrasound measures at baseline for both limbs.
Baseline
Elastography
Measures of interest include elastography. A study team member will assess ultrasound measures at 12 weeks for both limbs.
12-week
Elastography
Measures of interest include elastography. A study team member will assess ultrasound measures at 6 months for both limbs.
6 Months
Heel Raises-Quantitative Function in Heel Raises to Fatigue.
Quantitative function in heel raises to fatigue on both limbs.
Baseline
Heel Raises-Quantitative Function in Heel Raises to Fatigue.
Quantitative function in heel raises to fatigue on both limbs.
12-week
Heel Raises-Quantitative Function in Heel Raises to Fatigue.
Quantitative function in heel raises to fatigue on both limbs.
6 Months
Hops
Quantitative function in ankle strength, we will also ask the participants to complete 20 hops and rate their pain using the Defense and Veteran's Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS). The Defense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS) is a pain assessment tool designed specifically for military personnel and veterans Rating scale from 0-10. Higher scores equal worse outcomes.
Baseline
Hops
Quantitative function in ankle strength, we will also ask the participants to complete 20 hops and rate their pain using the Defense and Veteran's Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS). The Defense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS) is a pain assessment tool designed specifically for military personnel and veterans Rating scale from 0-10. Higher scores equal worse outcomes.
12-week
Hops
Quantitative function in ankle strength, we will also ask the participants to complete 20 hops and rate their pain using the Defense and Veteran's Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS). The Defense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS) is a pain assessment tool designed specifically for military personnel and veterans Rating scale from 0-10. Higher scores equal worse outcomes.
6 Months
Ankle Range of Motion (ROM)
Quantitative function in range of motion (ROM).
Baseline
Ankle Range of Motion (ROM)
Quantitative function in range of motion (ROM)
12-week
Ankle Range of Motion (ROM)
Quantitative function in range of motion (ROM)
6 Months
Study Arms (4)
Physical Therapy (PT) Only
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants in the PT only arm will follow the PT program outlined above. Twice a week for three weeks, a team member will check-in with the participants to ensure physical therapy exercise adherence, and response to treatment. During the second check-in of the week, the study team member will also ensure the participant is keeping their activity/medication/pain log; the study team member will also deliver the DVPRS with supplemental questions. (See Appendix F for Check-in Data Collection CRF). These check-ins may occur virtually or in person. In Part 1, the physical therapy only arm requires 8 visits. The participants will complete 2 check-in visits each week (remote or in person), for three weeks. Follow-up data will be collected at 6 weeks (virtual or in-person) and at 3 months (in-person).
PT + Photobiomodulation Therapy (PBMT)
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe physical therapy + photobiomodulation therapy arm will receive PBMT twice a week, for three weeks, in addition to the PT treatment described above. A member of the study team will measure the treatment area according to a standard protocol (Appendix N PBM Dose Calculations), to calculate and determine the treatment time, approximately 5-20 minutes. PBMT will be delivered at 25W.
PT + Shockwave Therapy (SWT)
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe physical therapy + shockwave therapy arm will receive SWT once a week for three weeks in addition to the PT treatment described above. Twice a week, for three weeks, a team member will check-in with the participants to ensure physical therapy exercise adherence, and response to treatment. During the second check-in of the week, the study team member will also ensure the participant is keeping their activity/medication/pain log; the study team member will also deliver the DVPRS with supplemental questions. (See Appendix F for Check- in Data Collection CRF). The first check-in of the week will occur in-person after the SWT, if, however, this is not feasible, it may be conducted virtually; the second check-in of the week may occur virtually or in-person. In total, participants will receive one SWT treatment each week (in person) and complete two check-ins each week (remote or in person), for three weeks. The SWT will take approximately 5-20 minutes.
PT + SWT and PBMT
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe PT + SWT + PBMT arm will receive both SWT and PBMT treatments in addition to PT treatment described above. Participants will receive PBMT twice a week and SWT once a week, for three weeks. The SWT visit may be combined with a PBMT visit in the same week. Up to two times each week after a treatment visit (for three weeks), a team member will check-in with the participants to ensure physical therapy exercise adherence, and response to treatment. During the second check-in of the week, the team member will also ensure the participant is keeping their activity/medication/pain log; the team member will also deliver the DVPRS with supplemental questions. When/if needed, these check-ins may occur virtually. (See Appendix F for check-in data collection CRF). In Part 1, the PT+ SWT + PBMT treatment arm requires 8 visits: 3 for PBMT alone with check- ins (in person), 3 for PBMT \& SWT with check-ins (in person), 6-week follow-up (virtual or in-person), and 3-month follow-up (in person).
Interventions
All participants may complete a PT program as standard of care (SOC) treatment addressing individual strength, mobility, and flexibility deficits in both proximal (e.g. spine and hip girdle) along with distal (thigh, leg, and foot/ankle) muscle groups. The provider may also use other modalities to address distal issues. To standardize the loading program, all participants will be given an at-home exercise program designed by Dr. Karin Sibernagel for progressive Achilles tendon loading. The participants will also follow the University of Delaware Return to Sport protocol for return to running. This will be completed alongside the standard of care PT participants will be receiving.
A medical provider will conduct SWT on study participants using the OrthoPlus Ultra 100. This Extracorporeal Pressure Activation Treatment device will be used at a radial shockwave of 3000 counts treatment settings of 15 Hz minimum 2 bars with a focus applicator head at mid-portion of Achilles using clinical focusing technique, and 3000 counts at 15 Hz minimum 2.5 bars using broad oscillator to myotendinous region and over symptomatic areas of gastrocnemius and soleus, treatment will be applied distally to proximally to facilitate lymphatic return adjusting treatment air pressure and amount of force applied by applicator head by patient comfort. The maximum setting for each treatment applicator will be 4 bars of air pressure, and the first 500 counts using each applicator will be applied at 1.5 bars to help desensitize the tissue prior to increasing energy settings. The settings used for each participant will be recorded and followed in a similar approach to treatment.
PBMT is delivered with the LightForce® XPi 25W device through the Smart Hand Piece technology. The therapy is transmitted with a rolling glass massage ball at 10 Joules/cm\^2 that is applied in a serpentine manner over the site of injury.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- DEERS Eligible
- Between the ages of 18-64
- Currently Active Duty in any of the US Armed Forces
- Clinical diagnosis of mid-portion Achilles tendinopathy (including both unilateral and bilateral) by a healthcare provider based on accepted diagnostic criteria.
- Able to read and understand English language for consent purposes
- Able to commit to 3-weeks of intervention and 6-months of follow-up
You may not qualify if:
- Primary insertional Achilles tendinopathy
- Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP), corticosteroid injection, or prolotherapy within 3 months
- Received dry needling within the past 4 weeks
- Previously completed the Silbernagel protocol for Achilles tendinopathy within the past 3 months
- Received SWT within the past 3 months to their Achilles
- Tattoo in the area of treatment (due to sensitivity to PBMT)
- Current use of pacemaker
- Patients with a known underlying cardiac disease that could be affected by SWT
- Patients with neuropathy affecting sensation to pain
- Current use of medications associated with sensitivity to heat or light (e.g. amiodarone, chlorpromazine, doxycycline, hydrochlorothiazide, nalidixic acid, naproxen, piroxicam, tetracycline, thioridazine, voriconazole)
- Current or chronic sciatica (lumbosacral radiculopathy) resulting in chronic or intermittent lower extremity pain, numbness, or tingling.
- Achilles tendon tear or prior Achilles tendon surgery
- Recent lower extremity injury within the last 3 months that required professional medical attention (e.g., ankle sprain, meniscus)
- Concurrent participation in another research study addressing pain issue
- Previously enrolled in the study for contralateral (opposite) leg
- +2 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Madigan Army Medical Center
Tacoma, Washington, 98431, United States
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Ms. Elizabeth Metzger, Senior Scientific Program Manager
- Organization
- The Geneva Foundation
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jeremy D Schroeder
Madigan Army Medical Center
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- FED
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 27, 2023
First Posted
March 2, 2023
Study Start
February 13, 2023
Primary Completion
November 14, 2024
Study Completion
November 14, 2024
Last Updated
July 22, 2025
Results First Posted
July 22, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share