NCT05751148

Brief Summary

Spinal anesthesia remains a mainstay in lower limbs- as in day-case surgeries as well. It consists in injecting a local anesthetic drug into the intrathecal space of a patient's spinal canal. To achieve a suitable sensory and motor block for elective or emergent surgery, the anesthetist must adapt his choice of local anesthetic to the surgery's requirements and the patient's comorbidities, too. Spinal anesthesia is often associated with adverse cardiovascular events, notably hypotension which is a major concern in current anesthetic practice, especially in specific patient populations. Spinal induced hypotension is reported to be commonly related to the sympathetic block level and may be linked to perioperative cardiac and renal complications. Several mechanisms might play a role in the incidence of perioperative hypotension after spinal puncture. A decrease in peripheric systemic vascular resistance from arterial vasodilatation, a reduction of cardiac output due to a decrease in preload from a redistribution of venous blood into lower limbs or even an occurrence or increment of cardiac dysfunction, might compound proper blood flow towards noble organs such as brain, heart and kidneys. Spinal induced hypotension may also be related to a direct reduction of cardiac contractibility by the local anesthetic injection. Compensating mechanisms might be inhibited depending on the level of sympathetic blockade, usually related to the dose of the local anesthetic. Former studies found that intrinsic left ventricular depression might occur during spinal anesthesia as left ventricular volumes per se remain stable. One noticed that diastolic and systolic function (i.e., ventricular outflow tract velocity) decreased significantly after intrathecal levobupivacaine plus fentanyl injection based on transthoracic ultrasound assessment. Other authors use Pro-Brain Natriuretic Peptide to assess myocardial stress induced by surgery and anesthetic management. Other serum markers such as Cortisol, Adreno Cortico-Trope Hormone, Angiotensin are identified to screen and monitor myocardial stress as for instance acute myocardial dysfunction. Hyperbaric prilocaine is an intermediate-acting local anesthetic, whereas bupivacaine may be intermediate- or long-acting depending on the employed dose. Both drugs provide comparable sensory and motor block that meet the anesthesia level requirements in various surgical procedures. In regard to the hemodynamic effects, hypotension has been largely reported following hyperbaric bupivacaine in a dose-dependent way. However, discrepancy exists between the rare studies having investigated prilocaine's effects, probably related to the methodology and the employed doses. Moreover, the hemodynamics effects of these local anesthetics have been barely specifically investigated in a non-cesarean section context. The aim of this study is to compare the cardiovascular effects inflicted by hyperbaric prilocaine and bupivacaine under spinal anesthesia. Cardiovascular response will be assessed by non-invasive hemodynamic monitoring whereas metabolic stress will be evaluated using serum stress markers.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
60

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2023

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 22, 2023

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 2, 2023

Completed
20 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 22, 2023

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 30, 2023

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 30, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

March 24, 2023

Status Verified

March 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

6 months

First QC Date

January 22, 2023

Last Update Submit

March 23, 2023

Conditions

Keywords

Hyperbaric BupivacaineHyperbaric PrilocaineNon-Invasive Hemodynamic AssessmentClear Sight EdwardsCardiac UltrasoundCardiac OutputStroke Volume Variation

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

  • Change in cardiac output assessed by Clear Sight device

    Cardiac output (liters per minute) will be assessed by the Clear Sight non-invasive hemodynamic system before spinal anesthesia (baseline), 20 minutes after spinal anesthesia and before discharge from the post anesthesia care unit (PACU).

    Up to two hours post surgery

  • Change in cardiac output assessed by transthoracic Ultrasound

    Cardiac output (liters per minute) will be assessed by ultrasound assessment before spinal anesthesia (baseline), 20 minutes after spinal anesthesia and before discharge from the post anesthesia care unit (PACU).

    Up to two hours post surgery

  • Stroke Volume Variation assessed by the Clear Sight device

    Stroke volume variation (%) will be assessed by the Clear Sight non-invasive hemodynamic system before spinal anesthesia, 20 minutes after spinal anesthesia and before discharge from the post anesthesia care unit (PACU).

    Up to two hours post surgery

  • Stroke Volume Variation assessed by transthoracic Ultrasound

    Stroke volume variation (%)will be assessed by ultrasound assessment before spinal anesthesia, 20 minutes after spinal anesthesia and before discharge from the post anesthesia care unit (PACU).

    Up to two hours post surgery

Secondary Outcomes (11)

  • Highest dermatome level

    20 minutes after spinal anesthesia

  • Motor block

    20 minutes after spinal anesthesia

  • Adrenocorticotropic Hormone (ACTH)

    Up to two hours post surgery

  • Cortisol

    Up to two hours post surgery

  • Dosage of Neuro-Inflammatory Markers

    Up to two hours post surgery

  • +6 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Group 1: Hyperbaric Bupivacaine

ACTIVE COMPARATOR
Drug: Hyperbaric bupivacaïne

Group 2: Hyperbaric Prilocaine

ACTIVE COMPARATOR
Drug: Hyperbaric prilocaïne

Interventions

Spinal anesthesia with 10mg of hyperbaric bupivacaïne. A syringe filled with 2 mL of hyperbaric bupivacaïne + 0,5 ml of saline solution

Also known as: Hyperbaric Marcaïne
Group 1: Hyperbaric Bupivacaine

Spinal anesthesia with 50mg of hyperbaric prilocaïne. A syringe filled with 2,5 mL of hyperbaric prilocaïne

Also known as: Tachipri
Group 2: Hyperbaric Prilocaine

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 65 Years
Sexmale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Male
  • cm \< x \< 180 cm
  • Aged of 18 or more and less than 65
  • Elective surgery under spinal anesthesia
  • American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) I or II

You may not qualify if:

  • History of heart disease: ischemic or valvular
  • Atrial fibrillation
  • Cardiotropic medication
  • Cardiovascular disease history
  • Norepinephrine uptake medication
  • Urgent surgery
  • History of narrow spinal canal
  • Hemostasis abnormalities or local skin infection
  • Hypersensitivity to local anesthetics
  • Failure of spinal anesthesia leading to plan change during surgery
  • Patient's refusal

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Saint Pierre University Hospital

Brussels, 1000, Belgium

RECRUITING

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Cardiotoxicity

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Heart DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsChemically-Induced DisordersRadiation InjuriesWounds and Injuries

Study Officials

  • Panayota Kapessidou, MD. PhD.

    Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Saint Pierre

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Central Study Contacts

Daniel Patricio, MD.

CONTACT

Panayota Kapessidou, MD. PhD.

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 22, 2023

First Posted

March 2, 2023

Study Start

March 22, 2023

Primary Completion

September 30, 2023

Study Completion

September 30, 2023

Last Updated

March 24, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-03

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations