NCT05731739

Brief Summary

The investigators will conduct a retrospective cohort study of patients who have undergone i.v. lidocaine infusions in the previous 2 years for suspected neuropathic pain of heterogeneous origin. The investigators hypothesize that the analgesic response to intravenous (i.v.) lidocaine will be bimodal with clear responders and clear non-responders. The investigators also hypothesize that more refractory patients, who have failed previous multimodal analgesic therapy, will be less likely to respond to i.v. lidocaine. The investigators goals are to report what percentage of patients will achieve relief, the degree of relief that can be expected, and identify the type of patients who will most likely to benefit from systemic lidocaine. The investigators secondary objective is to report the correlation between infusion rates and patterns of infusion rate adjustments with regard to efficacy and adverse effects.

Trial Health

30
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2016

Longer than P75 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
withdrawn

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 1, 2016

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 6, 2016

Completed
6.7 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 1, 2023

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 1, 2023

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 16, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

February 16, 2023

Status Verified

February 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

6.8 years

First QC Date

April 6, 2016

Last Update Submit

February 7, 2023

Conditions

Keywords

LIDOCAINE, NEUROPATHIC PAIN, CHRONIC PAIN

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Identify the type of patients who will most likely to benefit from systemic lidocaine.

    Primary aim is to test the hypothesis that the analgesic response to intravenous (i.v.) lidocaine are bimodal with responders and non-responders.

    April, 2016 - August, 2016

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Quantify the efficacy of lidocaine infusion in terms of duration of meaningful decrease in pain in patients with neuropathic pain

    April, 2016 - August, 2016

  • Our last objective is to report the adverse effects

    April, 2016 - August, 2016

Study Arms (2)

RESPONDERS

The investigators will define responders as patients achieving Numerical Rating Score (NRS) reductions of 30% or greater based on literature defined criteria for meaningful reductions in pain scores

NON RESPONDERS

When a patient failed to respond to the lidocaine infusion, they were given the option to have repeat infusion after four weeks. If no response was obtained, despite two infusions, this was considered as a failure of treatment and no further lidocaine infusions were conducted. Patient will be labelled as a non responder

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Patients' information and their treatment data will be identified through the electronic medical record (EPIC) of the pain management clinic. The investigators will screen sequential charts of previous two years to identify patients who have undergone i.v. lidocaine infusions for Neuropathic Pain of heterogeneous origin (e.g., post-herpetic neuralgia, post surgical nerve injury, lumbar radiculopathy). Inclusion criteria will include: neuropathic pain suspected by the board certified pain specialist assessing the patient based on the presence of allodynia, hyperalgesia, hyperpathia and hyperesthesia or hypesthesia. The exclusion criteria will include patients that refused subsequent i.v. lidocaine infusions or were lost to follow up.

You may qualify if:

  • patient with neuropathic pain
  • patient enrolled for lidocaine infusion

You may not qualify if:

  • refusal to consent
  • lost to follow-up

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Henry Ford Health Systems

Detroit, Michigan, 48202, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

NeuralgiaComplex Regional Pain SyndromesChronic Pain

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Peripheral Nervous System DiseasesNeuromuscular DiseasesNervous System DiseasesPainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsAutonomic Nervous System Diseases

Study Officials

  • NABIL SIBAI, M.D.

    HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEMS

    STUDY CHAIR
0

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
RETROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
RESIDENT ANESTHESIOLOGY

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 6, 2016

First Posted

February 16, 2023

Study Start

April 1, 2016

Primary Completion

January 1, 2023

Study Completion

January 1, 2023

Last Updated

February 16, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-02

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations