Study Stopped
Resources did not come to fruition
IV Lidocaine Infusion for Neuropathic Pain
A Retrospective Analysis of Clinical Outcomes of IV Lidocaine Infusion for Neuropathic Pain: Assessing Predictors of Clinically Relevant Analgesia and to Report the Efficacy and Side Effect Profile of Infusion
1 other identifier
observational
N/A
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The investigators will conduct a retrospective cohort study of patients who have undergone i.v. lidocaine infusions in the previous 2 years for suspected neuropathic pain of heterogeneous origin. The investigators hypothesize that the analgesic response to intravenous (i.v.) lidocaine will be bimodal with clear responders and clear non-responders. The investigators also hypothesize that more refractory patients, who have failed previous multimodal analgesic therapy, will be less likely to respond to i.v. lidocaine. The investigators goals are to report what percentage of patients will achieve relief, the degree of relief that can be expected, and identify the type of patients who will most likely to benefit from systemic lidocaine. The investigators secondary objective is to report the correlation between infusion rates and patterns of infusion rate adjustments with regard to efficacy and adverse effects.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
Started Apr 2016
Longer than P75 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 6, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 16, 2023
CompletedFebruary 16, 2023
February 1, 2023
6.8 years
April 6, 2016
February 7, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Identify the type of patients who will most likely to benefit from systemic lidocaine.
Primary aim is to test the hypothesis that the analgesic response to intravenous (i.v.) lidocaine are bimodal with responders and non-responders.
April, 2016 - August, 2016
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Quantify the efficacy of lidocaine infusion in terms of duration of meaningful decrease in pain in patients with neuropathic pain
April, 2016 - August, 2016
Our last objective is to report the adverse effects
April, 2016 - August, 2016
Study Arms (2)
RESPONDERS
The investigators will define responders as patients achieving Numerical Rating Score (NRS) reductions of 30% or greater based on literature defined criteria for meaningful reductions in pain scores
NON RESPONDERS
When a patient failed to respond to the lidocaine infusion, they were given the option to have repeat infusion after four weeks. If no response was obtained, despite two infusions, this was considered as a failure of treatment and no further lidocaine infusions were conducted. Patient will be labelled as a non responder
Eligibility Criteria
Patients' information and their treatment data will be identified through the electronic medical record (EPIC) of the pain management clinic. The investigators will screen sequential charts of previous two years to identify patients who have undergone i.v. lidocaine infusions for Neuropathic Pain of heterogeneous origin (e.g., post-herpetic neuralgia, post surgical nerve injury, lumbar radiculopathy). Inclusion criteria will include: neuropathic pain suspected by the board certified pain specialist assessing the patient based on the presence of allodynia, hyperalgesia, hyperpathia and hyperesthesia or hypesthesia. The exclusion criteria will include patients that refused subsequent i.v. lidocaine infusions or were lost to follow up.
You may qualify if:
- patient with neuropathic pain
- patient enrolled for lidocaine infusion
You may not qualify if:
- refusal to consent
- lost to follow-up
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Henry Ford Health Systems
Detroit, Michigan, 48202, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
NABIL SIBAI, M.D.
HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEMS
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- RETROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- RESIDENT ANESTHESIOLOGY
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 6, 2016
First Posted
February 16, 2023
Study Start
April 1, 2016
Primary Completion
January 1, 2023
Study Completion
January 1, 2023
Last Updated
February 16, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share