The Effect Of Supportive Approach According To Kolcaba Comfort Theory Applied To Parents Of Children With Cerebral Palsy
1 other identifier
interventional
73
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Purpose: This study was conducted to evaluate the effect of the structured supportive approach given to the parents of children with cerebral palsy according to Kolcaba Comfort Theory on the child's comfort, quality of life and parent's self-efficacy.\_ H01: According to Kolcaba's Comfort Theory, there is no difference between the comfort scores of the children of parents (study group) to whom the structured supportive approach was applied and the children of the parents who did not apply this approach (control group). H02: According to Kolcaba's Comfort Theory, there is no difference between the quality of life scores of the children of parents (study group) to whom the structured supportive approach was applied and the children of parents who did not apply this approach (control group). H03: According to Kolcaba's Comfort Theory, there is no difference between the self-efficacy scores of the parents (study group) who applied the structured supportive approach and the parents who did not apply this approach (control group)\_
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2021
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 2, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 11, 2022
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 10, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 16, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 27, 2023
CompletedFebruary 28, 2023
February 1, 2023
1 year
December 10, 2022
February 27, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Comfort Behaviors Checklist
This form is used to evaluate the comfort of patients who are unable to fill out a questionnaire or who have cognitive limitations. It consists of 30 items. High scores indicate a high level of comfort. If all questions are answered, the lowest score that can be obtained from the scale is 25, and the highest score is 100.High scores indicate increased comfort and low scores indicate decreased comfort.
on completion of the study, an average of 3 months
Quality of Life Scale for Children Parent Form
The scale is a self-report scale and questions the status of children and adolescents regarding quality of life in the last month. The scale consists of four subsections, 23 items in total, in which physical, emotional, social and school-related functionality are questioned. The scale has a five-choice Likert-type response scale (0=never, 1=rarely, 2=sometimes, 3=often, 4=always). The scores obtained from the items are translated linearly as 0=100, 1=75, 2=50, 3=25, 4=0. If all questions are answered, the lowest score that can be obtained from the scale is 25, and the highest score is 100.High scores indicate an increase in quality of life, and low scores indicate a decrease.
on completion of the study, an average of 3 months
Self-Efficiency Scale
There are 19 items, seven of which are fillers, and are of a five-point Likert type. Respondents were presented with response categories ranging from "strongly disagree" to "strongly agree". In scoring the items, "strongly disagree" gets 1 point and "strongly agree" gets 5 points; High scores indicate high self-efficacy. If all questions are answered, the lowest score that can be obtained from the scale is 19, and the highest score is 95. High scores indicate an increase in self-efficiency, and low scores indicate a decrease.
on completion of the study, an average of 3 months
Study Arms (2)
THE EFFECT OF A SUPPORTIVE APPROACH STRUCTURED ACCORDING TO KOLCABA'S COMFORT THEORY
EXPERIMENTALThe study group consisted of parents who were given a supportive approach structured according to Kolcaba's Comfort Theory by the researcher.
KOLCABA COMFORT THEORY APPLİED TO PARENTS OF CHİLDREN WİTH CEREBRAL PALSY
EXPERIMENTALDuring the training given by the researcher, the children continued their routine education in the rehabilitation center. Although the education to be done is for the child and their parents, the education was given directly to the parents, since the mental perception levels of the children may not be sufficient and mostly children with CP live dependent on their parents. The parent who will be involved in the research is the primary caregiver who is most interested in the child.
Interventions
Parents in the study groups were provided with training and support in line with their needs in the educational issues specified in the Family Education-Support Booklet for a Child with Cerebral Palsy. The control group was not trained. Research data were collected using the Child and Parent Information Form, Needs Determination Form, Relaxed Behavior Checklist (KDKL), Quality of Life for Children Parent Form (PIDQ) and Self-Efficacy Scale. The comfort and quality of life of the children in the study group and the self-efficacy of the parents were evaluated before the education, 1 month and 3 months after the education.
Eligibility Criteria
Contact the study team to discuss eligibility requirements. They can help determine if this study is right for you.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Adnan Menderes Univercity
Aydin, Efeler, 09000, Turkey (Türkiye)
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Hüsniye Çalışır, Prof. Dr.
Aydın Adnan Menderes Univercity
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- research asistant
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 10, 2022
First Posted
February 16, 2023
Study Start
November 2, 2021
Primary Completion
November 11, 2022
Study Completion
February 27, 2023
Last Updated
February 28, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share