Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Compared with Conventional Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy, a Randomized Controlled Clinical Study
1 other identifier
interventional
1,000
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy has been accepted and is nowadays considered as the gold standard treatment of gallstones disease. Conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (CLC) was defined as three or four port surgery carried out with either French or American position. It reduced post-operative pain and shorten post-operative length of stay compared with open cholecystectomy in a great extent. Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) as a revolutionized surgery, the main reason for its widespread use being the following: less post-operative pain, faster recovery, better cosmetics and quicker return to full activities, all resulting in the improvement of post-operative quality of life. SILC uses the umbilicus as a natural orifice allowing easy access to peritoneal cavity, easy conversion to standard laparoscopy and its easy closure, has been widely introduced into the clinical practice for benign gallbladder diseases. SILC can easily hide the surgical scar inside the umbilicus, thus has better cosmetic effect. But the real clinical benefits for patients still remain a matter of debate. In the last 5 years, many studies on SILC have been published, trying to answer the question whether such a new approach is worthwhile or not and whether is safe and cost-effective.Based on the above controversy, we conduct a RCT comparing clinical and peri-operative outcomes, such as quality of life (QOL), of SILC and CLC with the intent to assess the actual indications of the single-incision approach.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Feb 2023
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 5, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 6, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 15, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 2, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 2, 2025
CompletedJanuary 7, 2025
February 1, 2024
1.9 years
February 5, 2023
January 5, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Quality of life (time to return to normal life)
The quality of life of patients after operation was investigated by a unified SF-36 questionnaire.
2 years
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Cosmetic result
2 years
Grade II or above incidence of complications
2 years
Study Arms (2)
Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy
EXPERIMENTALSILC was defined as laparoscopic surgery done through a single trans-umbilical incision
Conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy
ACTIVE COMPARATORCLC was defined as three or four port surgery carried out with either French or American position.
Interventions
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is defined as total or subtotal desection of the gallbladder laparoscopically.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Benign gallbladder disease
You may not qualify if:
- Combined with liver cirrhosis (Child grade B and above)
- Upper abdominal surgical history;
- Gallbladder gangrene perforation;
- Changes in surgical plan (conversion to laparotomy,cholangiography, bile duct exploration, bile duct injury repair, abscess clearance, multivisceral resection.)
- patients and their families do not agree with the treatment lost follow-up
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
2nd Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, China
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, No.88 Jiefang Road, China
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Daren Liu, MD, PhD
Chief Physician
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 5, 2023
First Posted
February 15, 2023
Study Start
February 6, 2023
Primary Completion
January 2, 2025
Study Completion
January 2, 2025
Last Updated
January 7, 2025
Record last verified: 2024-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share