NCT05723653

Brief Summary

The goal of this Hybrid Type I effectiveness-implementation trial is to test an evidence-based, flexible, and tailored intervention that leverages existing social network members to promote retention in care and viral suppression among people living with HIV aged 18-49.

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
900

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
20mo left

Started Feb 2023

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

7 active sites

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress66%
Feb 2023Dec 2027

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 30, 2023

Completed
14 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 13, 2023

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 13, 2023

Completed
4.9 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 31, 2027

Expected
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 31, 2027

Last Updated

April 8, 2026

Status Verified

April 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

4.9 years

First QC Date

January 30, 2023

Last Update Submit

April 7, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

HIV care engagementHIV viral suppressionSocial supportSocial networks

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Missed Visit Proportion

    We count visits as scheduled (non-acute) visits to an antiretroviral prescribing provider. Missed Visit Proportion (MVP) is calculated as the proportion of total scheduled visits that are missed during the follow-up period. To permit longitudinal analyses, we shall also split the two-year follow-up period into eight three-month quarters and record, for each participant, whether he completed or missed his scheduled appointment during that quarter. Appointment and visit history to calculate MVP will be collected from each clinic's electronic medical record data.

    18 months

  • Viral Suppression

    Viral load (suppressed or not) will be measured in RNA copies/mL, with ≤200 copies/mL defined as viral suppression.

    18 months

Study Arms (2)

Social Network Support Intervention Condition

EXPERIMENTAL

The intervention condition will be delivered by trained Intervention Case Managers to n=300 Index participants and their Support Confidant. The intervention consists of (1) selection and invitation of a Support Confidant, (2) a face-to-face intervention between the Intervention Case Manager and the Index and Support Confidant, and (3) quarterly interactive mini-booster sessions delivered to the Index and Support Confidant via text or telephone, based on participant preference. At 12 months, Index participants in the experimental condition will be re-randomized to either continue receiving quarterly interactive mini-booster sessions or to stop receiving mini-boosters and return to treatment as usual.

Behavioral: Social Network Support Intervention

Treatment as Usual Condition

NO INTERVENTION

Treatment as Usual is comprehensive and follows Department of Health and Human Services guidelines and local protocols on the provision of HIV primary care, which include scheduling one HIV primary care visit and lab tests (including viral load) once every six months, i.e., two HIV primary care visits per year. In addition, all sites provide standard case management and mental health and psychosocial support services to all patients.

Interventions

The Social Network Support Intervention is an evidence-based, flexible, and tailored intervention that leverages existing social network members to promote retention in care and viral suppression among people living with HIV. The intervention consists of (1) selection and invitation of a Support Confidant, (2) a face-to-face intervention between the Intervention Case Manager and the Index and Support Confidant, and (3) quarterly interactive mini-booster sessions delivered to the Index and Support Confidant via text or telephone, based on participant preference.

Social Network Support Intervention Condition

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 49 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Aged 18-49 years old, inclusive
  • Speak English
  • Own a cell phone not shared with anyone else
  • Have missed at least one HIV care scheduled visit or have not been virally suppressed in the past 24 months.
  • Resides in Chicagoland, Illinois or Alabama

You may not qualify if:

  • Index agrees to engage the Support Confidant
  • Age 18 years or older
  • Speaks English
  • Owns a cell phone not shared with others
  • Is not a romantic/sexual partner of the Index participant
  • Romantic/Sexual partners of Index participant
  • Relationship strain or abuse present in Index-Support Confidant relationship

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (7)

University of Alabama at Birmingham 1917 Clinic

Birmingham, Alabama, 35205, United States

NOT YET RECRUITING

Birmingham AIDS Outreach

Birmingham, Alabama, 35233, United States

RECRUITING

Thrive Alabama

Huntsville, Alabama, 65801, United States

RECRUITING

Howard Brown Health

Chicago, Illinois, 60613, United States

RECRUITING

Chicago Center for HIV Elimination

Chicago, Illinois, 60637, United States

RECRUITING

Crown Family School of Social Work, Policy, and Practice at the University of Chicago

Chicago, Illinois, 60637, United States

NOT YET RECRUITING

Tulane University

New Orleans, Louisiana, 70118, United States

NOT YET RECRUITING

Related Publications (29)

  • Bouris A, Jaffe K, Eavou R, Liao C, Kuhns L, Voisin D, Schneider JA. Project nGage: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial of a Dyadic Network Support Intervention to Retain Young Black Men Who Have Sex With Men in HIV Care. AIDS Behav. 2017 Dec;21(12):3618-3629. doi: 10.1007/s10461-017-1954-8.

    PMID: 29079949BACKGROUND
  • Bouris A, Voisin D, Pilloton M, Flatt N, Eavou R, Hampton K, Kuhns LM, Eder M, Schneider JA. Project nGage: Network Supported HIV Care Engagement for Younger Black Men Who Have Sex with Men and Transgender Persons. J AIDS Clin Res. 2013 Aug 31;4:10.4172/2155-6113.1000236. doi: 10.4172/2155-6113.1000236.

    PMID: 24404408BACKGROUND
  • Cabral HJ, Tobias C, Rajabiun S, Sohler N, Cunningham C, Wong M, Cunningham W. Outreach program contacts: do they increase the likelihood of engagement and retention in HIV primary care for hard-to-reach patients? AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2007;21 Suppl 1:S59-67. doi: 10.1089/apc.2007.9986.

    PMID: 17563291BACKGROUND
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Estimated HIV incidence and prevalence in the United States, 2010-2015. HIV Surveillance Supplemental Report 2018;23(No. 1). http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/library/reports/hiv-surveillance.html. Published March 2018. Accessed [1 Dec 2022].

    BACKGROUND
  • Craw JA, Gardner LI, Marks G, Rapp RC, Bosshart J, Duffus WA, Rossman A, Coughlin SL, Gruber D, Safford LA, Overton J, Schmitt K. Brief strengths-based case management promotes entry into HIV medical care: results of the antiretroviral treatment access study-II. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2008 Apr 15;47(5):597-606. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e3181684c51.

    PMID: 18285714BACKGROUND
  • Curran GM, Bauer M, Mittman B, Pyne JM, Stetler C. Effectiveness-implementation hybrid designs: combining elements of clinical effectiveness and implementation research to enhance public health impact. Med Care. 2012 Mar;50(3):217-26. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3182408812.

    PMID: 22310560BACKGROUND
  • Damschroder LJ, Aron DC, Keith RE, Kirsh SR, Alexander JA, Lowery JC. Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implement Sci. 2009 Aug 7;4:50. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-4-50.

    PMID: 19664226BACKGROUND
  • Department of Health and Human Services. Ending the HIV Epidemic: A Plan for America. 2019; https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/ending-the-hiv-epidemic-fact-sheet.pdf.

    BACKGROUND
  • Diggle P, Liang K, Zeger S. Analysis of Longitudinal Data: Oxford Statistical Science Series. 1994.

    BACKGROUND
  • Eisinger RW, Dieffenbach CW, Fauci AS. HIV Viral Load and Transmissibility of HIV Infection: Undetectable Equals Untransmittable. JAMA. 2019 Feb 5;321(5):451-452. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.21167. No abstract available.

    PMID: 30629090BACKGROUND
  • Fauci AS, Redfield RR, Sigounas G, Weahkee MD, Giroir BP. Ending the HIV Epidemic: A Plan for the United States. JAMA. 2019 Mar 5;321(9):844-845. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.1343. No abstract available.

    PMID: 30730529BACKGROUND
  • Fisher JD, Fisher WA, Amico KR, Harman JJ. An information-motivation-behavioral skills model of adherence to antiretroviral therapy. Health Psychol. 2006 Jul;25(4):462-73. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.25.4.462.

    PMID: 16846321BACKGROUND
  • Fitzmaurice GM, Laird NM, Ware JH. Applied longitudinal analysis. Vol 998: John Wiley & Sons; 2012.

    BACKGROUND
  • Garamszegi LZ. Comparing effect sizes across variables: generalization without the need for Bonferroni correction. Behavioral Ecology. 2006;17(4):682-687.

    BACKGROUND
  • Glasgow RE, Vogt TM, Boles SM. Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework. Am J Public Health. 1999 Sep;89(9):1322-7. doi: 10.2105/ajph.89.9.1322.

    PMID: 10474547BACKGROUND
  • Higa DH, Marks G, Crepaz N, Liau A, Lyles CM. Interventions to improve retention in HIV primary care: a systematic review of U.S. studies. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2012 Dec;9(4):313-25. doi: 10.1007/s11904-012-0136-6.

    PMID: 22996171BACKGROUND
  • Hogan B, Carrasco JA, Wellman B. Visualizing Personal Networks: Working with Participant-aided Sociograms. Field Methods. 2007;19(2):116-144.

    BACKGROUND
  • Hoots BE, Finlayson TJ, Wejnert C, Paz-Bailey G; National HIV Behavioral Surveillance (NHBS) Study Group. Updated Data on Linkage to Human Immunodeficiency Virus Care and Antiretroviral Treatment Among Men Who Have Sex With Men-20 Cities, United States. J Infect Dis. 2017 Oct 17;216(7):808-812. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jix007.

    PMID: 28368493BACKGROUND
  • Jiang H, Kulkarni PM, Mallinckrodt CH, Shurzinske L, Molenberghs G, Lipkovich I. Covariate Adjustment for Logistic Regression Analysis of Binary Clinical Trial Data. Statistics in Biopharmaceutical Research. 2017;9(1):126-134.

    BACKGROUND
  • Liang K-Y, Zeger SL. Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika. 1986;73(1):13-22.

    BACKGROUND
  • McCullagh P, Nelder J. Generalized linear models., 2nd edn.(Chapman and Hall: London). Standard book on generalized linear models. 1989.

    BACKGROUND
  • Naar-King S, Templin T, Wright K, Frey M, Parsons JT, Lam P. Psychosocial factors and medication adherence in HIV-positive youth. AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2006 Jan;20(1):44-7. doi: 10.1089/apc.2006.20.44.

    PMID: 16426155BACKGROUND
  • Panel on Antiretroviral Guidelines for Adults and Adolescents. Guidelines for the Use of Antiretroviral Agents in Adults and Adolescents with HIV. Department of Health and Human Services. Guidelines for the Use of Antiretroviral Agents in Adults and Adolescents Living with HIV. Available at http://www.aidsinfo.nih.gov/ContentFiles/ AdultandAdolescentGL.pdf.

    BACKGROUND
  • Starace F, Massa A, Amico KR, Fisher JD. Adherence to antiretroviral therapy: an empirical test of the information-motivation-behavioral skills model. Health Psychol. 2006 Mar;25(2):153-62. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.25.2.153.

    PMID: 16569106BACKGROUND
  • Valeri L, Vanderweele TJ. Mediation analysis allowing for exposure-mediator interactions and causal interpretation: theoretical assumptions and implementation with SAS and SPSS macros. Psychol Methods. 2013 Jun;18(2):137-50. doi: 10.1037/a0031034. Epub 2013 Feb 4.

    PMID: 23379553BACKGROUND
  • VanderWeele TJ, Vansteelandt S. Mediation Analysis with Multiple Mediators. Epidemiol Methods. 2014 Jan;2(1):95-115. doi: 10.1515/em-2012-0010.

    PMID: 25580377BACKGROUND
  • VanderWeele TJ, Tchetgen Tchetgen EJ. Mediation analysis with time varying exposures and mediators. J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol. 2017 Jun;79(3):917-938. doi: 10.1111/rssb.12194. Epub 2016 Jun 27.

    PMID: 28824285BACKGROUND
  • Vittinghoff E, Sen S, McCulloch CE. Sample size calculations for evaluating mediation. Stat Med. 2009 Feb 15;28(4):541-57. doi: 10.1002/sim.3491.

    PMID: 19065627BACKGROUND
  • White IR, Royston P, Wood AM. Multiple imputation using chained equations: Issues and guidance for practice. Stat Med. 2011 Feb 20;30(4):377-99. doi: 10.1002/sim.4067. Epub 2010 Nov 30.

    PMID: 21225900BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

HIV Seropositivity

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

HIV InfectionsBlood-Borne InfectionsCommunicable DiseasesInfectionsSexually Transmitted Diseases, ViralSexually Transmitted DiseasesLentivirus InfectionsRetroviridae InfectionsRNA Virus InfectionsVirus DiseasesGenital DiseasesUrogenital DiseasesImmunologic Deficiency SyndromesImmune System Diseases

Study Officials

  • Alida Bouris, PhD

    University of Chicago

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • David S Batey, PhD

    Tulane University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Alida Bouris, PhD

CONTACT

David S Batey, PhD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Masking Details
Due to the nature of the intervention, it is not possible to blind participants, interventionists, and investigators. However, we take the following steps to minimize bias, assess contamination, and enhance rigor: (1) collecting baseline data prior to randomization; (2) Treatment as Usual (TAU) providers are blinded to allocation; and (3) assessing contamination at follow-up surveys by identifying overlap between the networks of those in each study arm.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Following study registration (at which a unique Study Identification (ID) will be assigned), Index participants will be randomized to either the intervention group (n=300) or Treatment as Usual (n=300). Intervention arm Indexes will identify a Support Confidant (SC) (creating Index-SC dyads). Study staff will discuss pros and cons of treatment as usual (equipoise induction) to balance the desirability of the two intervention conditions. After the 12-month follow-up survey, we will re-randomize the 300 Index-Support Confidant dyads in the intervention condition with equal probability to continue receiving standard mini-boosters (n=150 Index-Support Confidant dyads) or a return to treatment as usual (n=150 Index-Support Confidant dyads). The randomization schedule will be prepared in advance, and treatment assignment will be obtained using the randomization module in REDCap.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 30, 2023

First Posted

February 13, 2023

Study Start

February 13, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2027

Last Updated

April 8, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Individual Participant Data (IPD) will not be available to researchers outside of the study team.

Locations