Hybrid Type I Effectiveness-Implementation Trial of a Social Network Support Intervention
Harnessing Social Network Support to Improve Retention in Care and Viral Suppression Among People Living With HIV in Chicago and Alabama: A Hybrid Type I Effectiveness-implementation Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
900
1 country
7
Brief Summary
The goal of this Hybrid Type I effectiveness-implementation trial is to test an evidence-based, flexible, and tailored intervention that leverages existing social network members to promote retention in care and viral suppression among people living with HIV aged 18-49.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Feb 2023
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
7 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 30, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 13, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 13, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2027
April 8, 2026
April 1, 2026
4.9 years
January 30, 2023
April 7, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Missed Visit Proportion
We count visits as scheduled (non-acute) visits to an antiretroviral prescribing provider. Missed Visit Proportion (MVP) is calculated as the proportion of total scheduled visits that are missed during the follow-up period. To permit longitudinal analyses, we shall also split the two-year follow-up period into eight three-month quarters and record, for each participant, whether he completed or missed his scheduled appointment during that quarter. Appointment and visit history to calculate MVP will be collected from each clinic's electronic medical record data.
18 months
Viral Suppression
Viral load (suppressed or not) will be measured in RNA copies/mL, with ≤200 copies/mL defined as viral suppression.
18 months
Study Arms (2)
Social Network Support Intervention Condition
EXPERIMENTALThe intervention condition will be delivered by trained Intervention Case Managers to n=300 Index participants and their Support Confidant. The intervention consists of (1) selection and invitation of a Support Confidant, (2) a face-to-face intervention between the Intervention Case Manager and the Index and Support Confidant, and (3) quarterly interactive mini-booster sessions delivered to the Index and Support Confidant via text or telephone, based on participant preference. At 12 months, Index participants in the experimental condition will be re-randomized to either continue receiving quarterly interactive mini-booster sessions or to stop receiving mini-boosters and return to treatment as usual.
Treatment as Usual Condition
NO INTERVENTIONTreatment as Usual is comprehensive and follows Department of Health and Human Services guidelines and local protocols on the provision of HIV primary care, which include scheduling one HIV primary care visit and lab tests (including viral load) once every six months, i.e., two HIV primary care visits per year. In addition, all sites provide standard case management and mental health and psychosocial support services to all patients.
Interventions
The Social Network Support Intervention is an evidence-based, flexible, and tailored intervention that leverages existing social network members to promote retention in care and viral suppression among people living with HIV. The intervention consists of (1) selection and invitation of a Support Confidant, (2) a face-to-face intervention between the Intervention Case Manager and the Index and Support Confidant, and (3) quarterly interactive mini-booster sessions delivered to the Index and Support Confidant via text or telephone, based on participant preference.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Aged 18-49 years old, inclusive
- Speak English
- Own a cell phone not shared with anyone else
- Have missed at least one HIV care scheduled visit or have not been virally suppressed in the past 24 months.
- Resides in Chicagoland, Illinois or Alabama
You may not qualify if:
- Index agrees to engage the Support Confidant
- Age 18 years or older
- Speaks English
- Owns a cell phone not shared with others
- Is not a romantic/sexual partner of the Index participant
- Romantic/Sexual partners of Index participant
- Relationship strain or abuse present in Index-Support Confidant relationship
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Chicagolead
- Tulane Universitycollaborator
- University of Alabama at Birminghamcollaborator
- Birmingham AIDS Outreachcollaborator
- Chicago Center for HIV Eliminationcollaborator
- Howard Brown Healthcollaborator
- Thrive Alabamacollaborator
Study Sites (7)
University of Alabama at Birmingham 1917 Clinic
Birmingham, Alabama, 35205, United States
Birmingham AIDS Outreach
Birmingham, Alabama, 35233, United States
Thrive Alabama
Huntsville, Alabama, 65801, United States
Howard Brown Health
Chicago, Illinois, 60613, United States
Chicago Center for HIV Elimination
Chicago, Illinois, 60637, United States
Crown Family School of Social Work, Policy, and Practice at the University of Chicago
Chicago, Illinois, 60637, United States
Tulane University
New Orleans, Louisiana, 70118, United States
Related Publications (29)
Bouris A, Jaffe K, Eavou R, Liao C, Kuhns L, Voisin D, Schneider JA. Project nGage: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial of a Dyadic Network Support Intervention to Retain Young Black Men Who Have Sex With Men in HIV Care. AIDS Behav. 2017 Dec;21(12):3618-3629. doi: 10.1007/s10461-017-1954-8.
PMID: 29079949BACKGROUNDBouris A, Voisin D, Pilloton M, Flatt N, Eavou R, Hampton K, Kuhns LM, Eder M, Schneider JA. Project nGage: Network Supported HIV Care Engagement for Younger Black Men Who Have Sex with Men and Transgender Persons. J AIDS Clin Res. 2013 Aug 31;4:10.4172/2155-6113.1000236. doi: 10.4172/2155-6113.1000236.
PMID: 24404408BACKGROUNDCabral HJ, Tobias C, Rajabiun S, Sohler N, Cunningham C, Wong M, Cunningham W. Outreach program contacts: do they increase the likelihood of engagement and retention in HIV primary care for hard-to-reach patients? AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2007;21 Suppl 1:S59-67. doi: 10.1089/apc.2007.9986.
PMID: 17563291BACKGROUNDCenters for Disease Control and Prevention. Estimated HIV incidence and prevalence in the United States, 2010-2015. HIV Surveillance Supplemental Report 2018;23(No. 1). http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/library/reports/hiv-surveillance.html. Published March 2018. Accessed [1 Dec 2022].
BACKGROUNDCraw JA, Gardner LI, Marks G, Rapp RC, Bosshart J, Duffus WA, Rossman A, Coughlin SL, Gruber D, Safford LA, Overton J, Schmitt K. Brief strengths-based case management promotes entry into HIV medical care: results of the antiretroviral treatment access study-II. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2008 Apr 15;47(5):597-606. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e3181684c51.
PMID: 18285714BACKGROUNDCurran GM, Bauer M, Mittman B, Pyne JM, Stetler C. Effectiveness-implementation hybrid designs: combining elements of clinical effectiveness and implementation research to enhance public health impact. Med Care. 2012 Mar;50(3):217-26. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3182408812.
PMID: 22310560BACKGROUNDDamschroder LJ, Aron DC, Keith RE, Kirsh SR, Alexander JA, Lowery JC. Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implement Sci. 2009 Aug 7;4:50. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-4-50.
PMID: 19664226BACKGROUNDDepartment of Health and Human Services. Ending the HIV Epidemic: A Plan for America. 2019; https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/ending-the-hiv-epidemic-fact-sheet.pdf.
BACKGROUNDDiggle P, Liang K, Zeger S. Analysis of Longitudinal Data: Oxford Statistical Science Series. 1994.
BACKGROUNDEisinger RW, Dieffenbach CW, Fauci AS. HIV Viral Load and Transmissibility of HIV Infection: Undetectable Equals Untransmittable. JAMA. 2019 Feb 5;321(5):451-452. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.21167. No abstract available.
PMID: 30629090BACKGROUNDFauci AS, Redfield RR, Sigounas G, Weahkee MD, Giroir BP. Ending the HIV Epidemic: A Plan for the United States. JAMA. 2019 Mar 5;321(9):844-845. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.1343. No abstract available.
PMID: 30730529BACKGROUNDFisher JD, Fisher WA, Amico KR, Harman JJ. An information-motivation-behavioral skills model of adherence to antiretroviral therapy. Health Psychol. 2006 Jul;25(4):462-73. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.25.4.462.
PMID: 16846321BACKGROUNDFitzmaurice GM, Laird NM, Ware JH. Applied longitudinal analysis. Vol 998: John Wiley & Sons; 2012.
BACKGROUNDGaramszegi LZ. Comparing effect sizes across variables: generalization without the need for Bonferroni correction. Behavioral Ecology. 2006;17(4):682-687.
BACKGROUNDGlasgow RE, Vogt TM, Boles SM. Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework. Am J Public Health. 1999 Sep;89(9):1322-7. doi: 10.2105/ajph.89.9.1322.
PMID: 10474547BACKGROUNDHiga DH, Marks G, Crepaz N, Liau A, Lyles CM. Interventions to improve retention in HIV primary care: a systematic review of U.S. studies. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2012 Dec;9(4):313-25. doi: 10.1007/s11904-012-0136-6.
PMID: 22996171BACKGROUNDHogan B, Carrasco JA, Wellman B. Visualizing Personal Networks: Working with Participant-aided Sociograms. Field Methods. 2007;19(2):116-144.
BACKGROUNDHoots BE, Finlayson TJ, Wejnert C, Paz-Bailey G; National HIV Behavioral Surveillance (NHBS) Study Group. Updated Data on Linkage to Human Immunodeficiency Virus Care and Antiretroviral Treatment Among Men Who Have Sex With Men-20 Cities, United States. J Infect Dis. 2017 Oct 17;216(7):808-812. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jix007.
PMID: 28368493BACKGROUNDJiang H, Kulkarni PM, Mallinckrodt CH, Shurzinske L, Molenberghs G, Lipkovich I. Covariate Adjustment for Logistic Regression Analysis of Binary Clinical Trial Data. Statistics in Biopharmaceutical Research. 2017;9(1):126-134.
BACKGROUNDLiang K-Y, Zeger SL. Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika. 1986;73(1):13-22.
BACKGROUNDMcCullagh P, Nelder J. Generalized linear models., 2nd edn.(Chapman and Hall: London). Standard book on generalized linear models. 1989.
BACKGROUNDNaar-King S, Templin T, Wright K, Frey M, Parsons JT, Lam P. Psychosocial factors and medication adherence in HIV-positive youth. AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2006 Jan;20(1):44-7. doi: 10.1089/apc.2006.20.44.
PMID: 16426155BACKGROUNDPanel on Antiretroviral Guidelines for Adults and Adolescents. Guidelines for the Use of Antiretroviral Agents in Adults and Adolescents with HIV. Department of Health and Human Services. Guidelines for the Use of Antiretroviral Agents in Adults and Adolescents Living with HIV. Available at http://www.aidsinfo.nih.gov/ContentFiles/ AdultandAdolescentGL.pdf.
BACKGROUNDStarace F, Massa A, Amico KR, Fisher JD. Adherence to antiretroviral therapy: an empirical test of the information-motivation-behavioral skills model. Health Psychol. 2006 Mar;25(2):153-62. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.25.2.153.
PMID: 16569106BACKGROUNDValeri L, Vanderweele TJ. Mediation analysis allowing for exposure-mediator interactions and causal interpretation: theoretical assumptions and implementation with SAS and SPSS macros. Psychol Methods. 2013 Jun;18(2):137-50. doi: 10.1037/a0031034. Epub 2013 Feb 4.
PMID: 23379553BACKGROUNDVanderWeele TJ, Vansteelandt S. Mediation Analysis with Multiple Mediators. Epidemiol Methods. 2014 Jan;2(1):95-115. doi: 10.1515/em-2012-0010.
PMID: 25580377BACKGROUNDVanderWeele TJ, Tchetgen Tchetgen EJ. Mediation analysis with time varying exposures and mediators. J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol. 2017 Jun;79(3):917-938. doi: 10.1111/rssb.12194. Epub 2016 Jun 27.
PMID: 28824285BACKGROUNDVittinghoff E, Sen S, McCulloch CE. Sample size calculations for evaluating mediation. Stat Med. 2009 Feb 15;28(4):541-57. doi: 10.1002/sim.3491.
PMID: 19065627BACKGROUNDWhite IR, Royston P, Wood AM. Multiple imputation using chained equations: Issues and guidance for practice. Stat Med. 2011 Feb 20;30(4):377-99. doi: 10.1002/sim.4067. Epub 2010 Nov 30.
PMID: 21225900BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Alida Bouris, PhD
University of Chicago
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
David S Batey, PhD
Tulane University
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Masking Details
- Due to the nature of the intervention, it is not possible to blind participants, interventionists, and investigators. However, we take the following steps to minimize bias, assess contamination, and enhance rigor: (1) collecting baseline data prior to randomization; (2) Treatment as Usual (TAU) providers are blinded to allocation; and (3) assessing contamination at follow-up surveys by identifying overlap between the networks of those in each study arm.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 30, 2023
First Posted
February 13, 2023
Study Start
February 13, 2023
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2027
Last Updated
April 8, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Individual Participant Data (IPD) will not be available to researchers outside of the study team.