Alterations in Spinal Alignment and Mobility in Individuals With Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair
1 other identifier
observational
50
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of this observational study was to the alterations in spinal alignment in individuals who have undergone RC surgery and revealed the differences compared to healthy individuals.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
Started Jun 2018
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 20, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 25, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 15, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 1, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 10, 2023
CompletedFebruary 10, 2023
February 1, 2023
11 months
February 1, 2023
February 1, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Spinal alignment and mobility assessment
The Spinal Mouse (IDIAG M360), novel, a computer-aided electronic measuring tool that noninvasively evaluates spinal range of motion and intersegmental angles, was used to examine spinal posture. The Spinal Mouse device is reliable and valid for the assessment of spine mobility and posture
8 months
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Scapular dyskinesia
8 months
Range of Motion
8 months
Postural stability
8 months
Study Arms (2)
RC Repair Group
Participants who had undergone the same arthroscopic RM surgical procedure and technique; had undergone acromioplasty and/or tenodesis with RM repair; had undergone arthroscopic RM surgery from the upper extremity of the dominant side; had completed six months following surgery
Healthy Group
Participants who had not undergone any shoulder surgery, had no history of shoulder-related pain, discomfort, or trauma in the last year
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
Patients who underwent arthroscopic RM surgery who had undergone the same arthroscopic RM surgical procedure and technique
You may qualify if:
- those who had undergone the same arthroscopic RM surgical procedure and technique
- had undergone acromioplasty and/or tenodesis with RM repair
- had undergone arthroscopic RM surgery from the upper extremity of the dominant side;
- had completed six months following surgery; were able to perform active shoulder elevation movements of 90° or more
- were between the ages of 40 and 75
- were volunteers to participate in the study.
You may not qualify if:
- who had undergone previous shoulder surgery or revision surgery, subscapularis tendon repair in addition to RM repair, scoliosis surgery, or any surgeries to limit spine motion, as well as those with a history of upper extremity fractures, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, cardiovascular disease, or chronic respiratory diseases that could limit the test's ability to be accomplished
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Bolu Abant Izzet Baysal University
Bolu, Central, 14000, Turkey (Türkiye)
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE CONTROL
- Time Perspective
- CROSS SECTIONAL
- Target Duration
- 8 Months
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Research Assistant
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 1, 2023
First Posted
February 10, 2023
Study Start
June 20, 2018
Primary Completion
May 25, 2019
Study Completion
January 15, 2020
Last Updated
February 10, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-02