NCT05714293

Brief Summary

The goal of this interventional, single-center study is to demonstrate if there is a change in the coronary ostia height after surgical aortic valve replacement and if it depends on the type of prosthesis or surgical technique used. The study involves patients undergoing elective surgical aortic valve replacement with a bioprosthesis. Participants enrolled will undergo a CT scan before and after surgery (at least 90 days after surgery) to analyze coronary ostia height.

Trial Health

55
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
90

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2023

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
enrolling by invitation

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 11, 2023

Completed
16 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 27, 2023

Completed
10 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 6, 2023

Completed
2.8 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 10, 2025

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 10, 2026

Completed
Last Updated

August 15, 2025

Status Verified

August 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

2.8 years

First QC Date

January 27, 2023

Last Update Submit

August 12, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

Aortic valve replacementAortic valve bioprosthesisCoronary ostia obstructionValve-in-valveTranscatheter aortic valve implantationAortic valve stenosisTricuspid aortic valveAortic valve regurgitationCT coronary angiogramTranscatheter aortic valve replacement

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Coronary ostia height differences.

    Differences in coronary ostia height before and after surgical aortic valve replacement.

    At least 90 days after surgery

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Coronary ostia height differences between different bioprostheses.

    At least 90 days after surgery

Study Arms (1)

Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement with a bioprosthesis will be asked to perform a thorax CT scan before surgery and one more at least 90 days after surgery.

Radiation: CT scan with contrast medium

Interventions

Multi-detector CT scan (if possible with prospective-ECG gated sequential scan) with contrast medium injection of nonionic contrast agent. All CT datasets will be analysed for the qualitative and quantitative assessment of the aortic root. The coronary height will be assessed at baseline in relation to the aortic annulus and in relation to the stent of the bioprostheses after aortic valve replacement.

Also known as: CT scan
Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 80 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Age ≥ 18 years;
  • Aortic valve stenosis or insufficiency with indication for elective aortic valve replacement with a bioprosthesis;
  • Possible concomitant coronary artery disease with indication for surgical or percutaneous revascularization;
  • CT imaging of the thorax with iodinated contrast agent carried out before surgery;
  • Signed informed consent, inclusive of release of medical information.

You may not qualify if:

  • Aortic valve replacement in bicuspid valve or endocarditis;
  • Aortic valve replacement associated with surgery of ascending aorta/aortic root;
  • Aortic valve replacement associated with other cardiac valve surgery;
  • Previous cardiac surgery of any kind;
  • Patient unable to give informed consent or potentially noncompliant with the study protocol, in the judgment of the investigator;
  • Participation in another clinical trial that could interfere with the endpoints of this study;
  • Pregnant at time of screening;
  • Allergy or hypersensitivity to iodinated contrast agent;
  • End-stage renal disease on dialysis.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Policlinico Agostino Gemelli

Roma, 00168, Italy

Location

Related Publications (11)

  • Stewart BF, Siscovick D, Lind BK, Gardin JM, Gottdiener JS, Smith VE, Kitzman DW, Otto CM. Clinical factors associated with calcific aortic valve disease. Cardiovascular Health Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997 Mar 1;29(3):630-4. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(96)00563-3.

    PMID: 9060903BACKGROUND
  • Vahanian A, Beyersdorf F, Praz F, Milojevic M, Baldus S, Bauersachs J, Capodanno D, Conradi L, De Bonis M, De Paulis R, Delgado V, Freemantle N, Gilard M, Haugaa KH, Jeppsson A, Juni P, Pierard L, Prendergast BD, Sadaba JR, Tribouilloy C, Wojakowski W; ESC/EACTS Scientific Document Group. 2021 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease. Eur Heart J. 2022 Feb 12;43(7):561-632. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab395. No abstract available.

    PMID: 34453165BACKGROUND
  • Dunning J, Gao H, Chambers J, Moat N, Murphy G, Pagano D, Ray S, Roxburgh J, Bridgewater B. Aortic valve surgery: marked increases in volume and significant decreases in mechanical valve use--an analysis of 41,227 patients over 5 years from the Society for Cardiothoracic Surgery in Great Britain and Ireland National database. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011 Oct;142(4):776-782.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2011.04.048.

    PMID: 21924147BACKGROUND
  • Capodanno D, Petronio AS, Prendergast B, Eltchaninoff H, Vahanian A, Modine T, Lancellotti P, Sondergaard L, Ludman PF, Tamburino C, Piazza N, Hancock J, Mehilli J, Byrne RA, Baumbach A, Kappetein AP, Windecker S, Bax J, Haude M. Standardized definitions of structural deterioration and valve failure in assessing long-term durability of transcatheter and surgical aortic bioprosthetic valves: a consensus statement from the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI) endorsed by the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2017 Sep 1;52(3):408-417. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezx244. No abstract available.

    PMID: 28874031BACKGROUND
  • Giordana F, Bruno F, Conrotto F, Saglietto A, D'Ascenzo F, Grosso Marra W, Dvir D, Webb J, D'Onofrio A, Camboni D, Grubitzsch H, Duncan A, Kaneko T, Toggweiler S, Latib A, Nerla R, Salizzoni S, La Torre M, Trompeo A, D'Amico M, Rinaldi M, De Ferrari G. Incidence, predictors and outcomes of valve-in-valve TAVI: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Cardiol. 2020 Oct 1;316:64-69. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2020.05.058. Epub 2020 May 26.

    PMID: 32470529BACKGROUND
  • Bernardi FLM, Dvir D, Rodes-Cabau J, Ribeiro HB. Valve-in-Valve Challenges: How to Avoid Coronary Obstruction. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2019 Aug 23;6:120. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2019.00120. eCollection 2019.

    PMID: 31508426BACKGROUND
  • Coti I, Maierhofer U, Rath C, Werner P, Loewe C, Kocher A, Laufer G, Andreas M. Effect of conventional and rapid-deployment aortic valve replacement on the distance from the aortic annulus to coronary arteries. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2021 Jan 22;32(2):196-203. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivaa247.

    PMID: 33236042BACKGROUND
  • Bruno P, Cammertoni F, Rosenhek R, Mazza A, Pavone N, Iafrancesco M, Nesta M, Chiariello GA, Spalletta C, Graziano G, Sanesi V, D'Errico D, Massetti M. Improved Patient Recovery With Minimally Invasive Aortic Valve Surgery: A Propensity-Matched Study. Innovations (Phila). 2019 Oct;14(5):419-427. doi: 10.1177/1556984519868715. Epub 2019 Aug 21.

    PMID: 31431105BACKGROUND
  • Freeman LA, Young PM, Foley TA, Williamson EE, Bruce CJ, Greason KL. CT and MRI assessment of the aortic root and ascending aorta. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013 Jun;200(6):W581-92. doi: 10.2214/AJR.12.9531.

    PMID: 23701088BACKGROUND
  • Salgado RA, Leipsic JA, Shivalkar B, Ardies L, Van Herck PL, Op de Beeck BJ, Vrints C, Rodrigus I, Parizel PM, Bosmans J. Preprocedural CT evaluation of transcatheter aortic valve replacement: what the radiologist needs to know. Radiographics. 2014 Oct;34(6):1491-514. doi: 10.1148/rg.346125076.

    PMID: 25310413BACKGROUND
  • Salemi A, Worku BM. Standard imaging techniques in transcatheter aortic valve replacement. J Thorac Dis. 2017 Apr;9(Suppl 4):S289-S298. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2017.03.114.

    PMID: 28540072BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Heart Valve DiseasesAortic Valve StenosisAortic Valve InsufficiencyBites and StingsAortic Valve Disease

Interventions

Contrast Media

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Heart DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesVentricular Outflow ObstructionPoisoningChemically-Induced DisordersWounds and Injuries

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Diagnostic Uses of ChemicalsPharmacologic ActionsChemical Actions and UsesSpecialty Uses of Chemicals

Study Officials

  • Massimo Massetti, MD

    Policlinico Agostino Gemelli

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
BASIC SCIENCE
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 27, 2023

First Posted

February 6, 2023

Study Start

January 11, 2023

Primary Completion

November 10, 2025

Study Completion

January 10, 2026

Last Updated

August 15, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-08

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations