Family-based Prevention of Diabetes Through Eating Habits and Physical Activity
GO_EASY
GO EASY: Eating Habits and Physical Activity in Synergy for Diabetes Prevention in Families
1 other identifier
interventional
18
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Introduction: Type 2 diabetes represents a growing health risk for the society. An easy-access and low-cost intervention for the whole family will be developed to help families with (at risk of) type 2 diabetes maintain diabetes-frendly everyday life. The intervention will be tested for feasibility. Methods: Following the framework for developing and conduct of complex interventions, the intervention will be developed on the basis of current evidence on family-based diabetes treatment and opinions of families with type 2 diabetes. The feasibility test will have embedded mixed methods one-group study design. Participants: Families will answer a brief screening questionnaire. Families (n=25) that consist of at least one adult with (in risk of) type 2 diabetes living in the same household with at least one 5-18 yeard old child, and at least one family member living sedentary lifestyle, will participate. Intervention: The 3-months long hybrid telehealth/face-to-face intervention with weekly 1-hour contacts with health professionals will deliver diabetes education and tailored support to implement more physical activity and healthy meals in the family everyday life. A 3-months long supervised maintenance phase with monthly professional contacts will be included. Outcomes: Feasibility evaluation will be conducted using quantitative (quantifiable) and qualitative research methods. The feasibility data will be the primary outcomes of the study, collected and evaluated using the predefined research progression criteria applied the green-amber-red method. Sociodemography and secondary outcomes, such as physical activity, dieting habits, daily occupations, occupational balance, health and quality of life will be assessed at baseline and 3 and 6-months follow-ups. The quantitative results will be comprehended through qualitative data from participant interviews which will nuance the feasibility evaluation. Analysis: Relevant statistical methods and qualitative analysis method will be applied. Expected results: The intervention will help families achieve sustainable lifestyle changes, e.g., diabetes stabilized blood glucose in adults with type 2 diabetes, increased physical activity time and improved dieting habits, for better family health and well-being. Ethics and dissemination: The trial does not have any obvious health risks for the participants. All the results - significant, non-significant and/ or inconclusive - will be reported.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable diabetes-mellitus-type-2
Started Jan 2024
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable diabetes-mellitus-type-2
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 29, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 23, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 15, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2024
CompletedMay 18, 2025
May 1, 2025
12 months
December 29, 2022
May 14, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (22)
Rate of the participants recruited per months
cf. predefined research progression criteria
3 months
Rate of the participants recruited per months
cf. predefined research progression criteria
6 months
Percentage of participants completed the intervention
cf. predefined research progression criteria
3 months
Percentage of participants completed the intervention
cf. predefined research progression criteria
6 months
Rate of participants' adherence to the intervention's sessions (attendance registration forms)
cf. predefined research progression criteria
3 months
Rate of participants' adherence to the intervention's sessions (attendance registration forms)
cf. predefined research progression criteria
6 months
Participants' self-perceived relevance (questionnaire, 5-items Likert scale, higher score is best)
cf. predefined research progression criteria
3 months
Participants' self-perceived relevance (questionnaire, 5-items Likert scale, higher score is best)
cf. predefined research progression criteria
6 months
Participants' self-perceived timing (questionnaire, 5-items Likert scale, higher score is best)
cf. predefined research progression criteria
3 months
Participants' self-perceived timing (questionnaire, 5-items Likert scale, higher score is best)
cf. predefined research progression criteria
6 months
Participants' self-perceived mode of delivery (questionnaire, 5-items Likert scale, higher score is best)
cf. predefined research progression criteria
3 months
Participants' self-perceived mode of delivery (questionnaire, 5-items Likert scale, higher score is best)
cf. predefined research progression criteria
6 months
Satisfaction with the treatment (questionnaire, 5-items Likert scale, higher score is best)
cf. predefined research progression criteria
3 months
Satisfaction with the treatment (questionnaire, 5-items Likert scale, higher score is best)
cf. predefined research progression criteria
6 months
Assessment procedure acceptance (questionnaire, 5-items Likert scale, higher score is best)
cf. predefined research progression criteria
3 months
Assessment procedure acceptance (questionnaire, 5-items Likert scale, higher score is best)
cf. predefined research progression criteria
6 months
Adverse events
cf. predefined research progression criteria
3 months
Adverse events
cf. predefined research progression criteria
6 months
Fidelity of delivery (questionnaire, 5-items Likert scale, higher score is best)
cf. predefined research progression criteria
3 months
Fidelity of delivery (questionnaire, 5-items Likert scale, higher score is best)
cf. predefined research progression criteria
6 months
Contextual appropriateness (questionnaire, 5-items Likert scale, higher score is best)
Treatment acceptance, cf. predefined research progression criteria
3 months
Contextual appropriateness (questionnaire, 5-items Likert scale, higher score is best)
Treatment acceptance, cf. predefined research progression criteria
6 months
Secondary Outcomes (11)
Weekly physical activity, self-reported
Change from baseline to 6 months
Daily wake-time physical activity, objective
Change from baseline to 6 months
Daily walking steps, objective
Change from baseline to 6 months
Dieting habits
Change from baseline to 6 months
Glucaemic control
Change from baseline to 6 months
- +6 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Families with type 2 diabetes
EXPERIMENTALFamilies (n=25) of at least two family members - minimum one adult and one child per family unit (appx. 100 individuals in total) will be included. A convenient study sample will be composed with no restriction to family types - traditional nuclear families, same-sex parenting families, single-parent families, or blended/ step-parent families). Balanced representation of different geographical areas within Region Zealand will be attempted.
Interventions
Families will participate in telehealth family education on diabetes management and prevention through lifestyle modifications in their everyday occupations regarding current recommendations for physical activity, grocery shopping, meal preparation, and family meal routines. Each family will be assisted in setting tailored goals for the family as a whole and individually regarding physical activity and dieting habits. The goals will be incorporated into family daily routines, to secure manageability and sustainability of the new lifestyle habits. Local facilities and communy networks will be engaged in this process to empower and motivate the participants. Working with the goals will be monitored and facilitated throughout the intervention period of 3 months. Before discharge, each family will co-produce a maintenance plan for physical activity and healthy dieting.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Parents (aged 18 or older) with (or at risk of) type 2 diabetes living in the same household with 5-17 years old children
- At least one family member not meeting the current physical activity recommendations.
You may not qualify if:
- Pregnancy or postpartum period (6 months after birth)
- Current critical illness, e.g. cancer
- Participating in other type 2 diabetes treatment programs
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Svetlana Solgaard Nielsen
Slagelse, 4200, Denmark
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Svetlana Solgaard Nielsen, PhD
Slagelse Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator, Occupational Therapist, PhD, postdoc
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 29, 2022
First Posted
January 23, 2023
Study Start
January 15, 2024
Primary Completion
December 31, 2024
Study Completion
December 31, 2024
Last Updated
May 18, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share