The Effect of Implant-supported Prosthesis on Acoustic Voice Quality

NCT05692609 | Unknown

• 1 other identifier: MUDHF_PTT_02
• Study Type: observational
• Target: 30
• Locations: 1 country
• Sites: 1

Brief Summary

The primary aim of this study was to compare the acoustic sound quality of edentulous patients rehabilitated with two-implant overdentures or the all-on-4 concept. The secondary aims were to evaluate the effect of implant and prosthetic success on acoustics.

Conditions

Edentulous Jaw

Keywords

Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported; Speech Acoustics

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

• Acoustic voice quality index

  The acoustic Voice Quality Index (AVQI) measures the perceived quality of a voice signal. It is based on evaluating several acoustic parameters that are known to be related to the perceived quality of speech. These parameters include measures of loudness, pitch, and spectral tilt, as well as measures of the presence of noise and other distortions in the signal. Acoustic voice quality will be evaluated in accordance with the AVQI index. During the control session, two separate voice recordings will be made with and without the participants' dentures in the mouth and transferred to the software. The score obtained according to the AVQI index will be used for statistical analysis between groups.

  At the follow-up session (approximately one year after delivery of the prosthesis)

Secondary Outcomes (2)

• Implant success

  At the follow-up session (approximately one year after delivery of the prosthesis)

• Prosthetic Success

  At the follow-up session (approximately one year after delivery of the prosthesis)

Study Arms (2)

Implant overdenture group

In the control session, participants' acoustic sound quality, implant and prosthesis success will be measured.

All-on-4 group

In the control session, participants' acoustic sound quality, implant and prosthesis success will be measured.

Eligibility Criteria

• Age: 18 Years - 65 Years
• Sex: all
• Healthy Volunteers: Yes
• Age Groups: Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
• Sampling Method: Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with all-on-4 or two-implant overdentures whose surgery and prosthesis were performed at Marmara University Faculty of Dentistry clinics

You may qualify if:

• No voice disorder or speech therapy
• The implant prosthesis was made at least one year ago, delivered to the patient, and continues to be used

You may not qualify if:

• Smoking (\>10 cigarettes/day) or substance use
• History of acute or chronic respiratory diseases
• Overdenture prosthesis on three or 4 implants
• History of speech and hearing problems
• Patients who have lost any implants before the control

Sponsors & Collaborators

• Marmara University: lead

Study Sites (1)

Marmara University School of Dentistry

Istanbul, 34854, Turkey (Türkiye)

RECRUITING

Related Publications (17)

• Tyrovolas S, Koyanagi A, Panagiotakos DB, Haro JM, Kassebaum NJ, Chrepa V, Kotsakis GA. Population prevalence of edentulism and its association with depression and self-rated health. Sci Rep. 2016 Nov 17;6:37083. doi: 10.1038/srep37083.

  PMID: 27853193 BACKGROUND

• Marcus PA, Joshi A, Jones JA, Morgano SM. Complete edentulism and denture use for elders in New England. J Prosthet Dent. 1996 Sep;76(3):260-6. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3913(96)90169-9.

  PMID: 8887798 BACKGROUND

• Romandini M, Baima G, Antonoglou G, Bueno J, Figuero E, Sanz M. Periodontitis, Edentulism, and Risk of Mortality: A Systematic Review with Meta-analyses. J Dent Res. 2021 Jan;100(1):37-49. doi: 10.1177/0022034520952401. Epub 2020 Aug 31.

  PMID: 32866427 BACKGROUND

• Nowjack-Raymer RE, Sheiham A. Association of edentulism and diet and nutrition in US adults. J Dent Res. 2003 Feb;82(2):123-6. doi: 10.1177/154405910308200209.

  PMID: 12562885 BACKGROUND

• Slade GD, Akinkugbe AA, Sanders AE. Projections of U.S. Edentulism prevalence following 5 decades of decline. J Dent Res. 2014 Oct;93(10):959-65. doi: 10.1177/0022034514546165. Epub 2014 Aug 21.

  PMID: 25146182 BACKGROUND

• Douglass CW, Watson AJ. Future needs for fixed and removable partial dentures in the United States. J Prosthet Dent. 2002 Jan;87(1):9-14. doi: 10.1067/mpr.2002.121204.

  PMID: 11807477 BACKGROUND

• Malo P, Rangert B, Nobre M. "All-on-Four" immediate-function concept with Branemark System implants for completely edentulous mandibles: a retrospective clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2003;5 Suppl 1:2-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2003.tb00010.x.

  PMID: 12691645 BACKGROUND

• Zitzmann NU, Scharer P, Marinello CP. Factors influencing the success of GBR. Smoking, timing of implant placement, implant location, bone quality and provisional restoration. J Clin Periodontol. 1999 Oct;26(10):673-82. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-051x.1999.261007.x.

  PMID: 10522779 BACKGROUND

• Jacobs R, Manders E, Van Looy C, Lembrechts D, Naert I, van Steenberghe D. Evaluation of speech in patients rehabilitated with various oral implant-supported prostheses. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2001 Apr;12(2):167-73. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.012002167.x.

  PMID: 11251667 BACKGROUND

• Lu FL, Matteson S. Speech tasks and interrater reliability in perceptual voice evaluation. J Voice. 2014 Nov;28(6):725-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2014.01.018. Epub 2014 May 17.

  PMID: 24841668 BACKGROUND

• Umapathy K, Krishnan S, Parsa V, Jamieson DG. Discrimination of pathological voices using a time-frequency approach. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2005 Mar;52(3):421-30. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2004.842962.

  PMID: 15759572 BACKGROUND

• Asiaee M, Nourbakhsh M, Vahedian-Azimi A, Zare M, Jafari R, Atashi SS, Keramatfar A. The feasibility of using acoustic measures for predicting the Total Opacity Scores of chest computed tomography scans in patients with COVID-19. Clin Linguist Phon. 2024 Mar;38(2):97-115. doi: 10.1080/02699206.2022.2160659. Epub 2023 Jan 2.

  PMID: 36592050 BACKGROUND

• Shabnam S, Pushpavathi M, Gopi Sankar R, Sridharan KV, Vasanthalakshmi MS. A Comprehensive Application for Grading Severity of Voice Based on Acoustic Voice Quality Index v.02.03. J Voice. 2025 Jan;39(1):287.e1-287.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2022.08.013. Epub 2022 Oct 1.

  PMID: 36192290 BACKGROUND

• Barsties V Latoszek B, Ulozaite-Staniene N, Petrauskas T, Uloza V, Maryn Y. Diagnostic Accuracy of Dysphonia Classification of DSI and AVQI. Laryngoscope. 2019 Mar;129(3):692-698. doi: 10.1002/lary.27350. Epub 2018 Sep 10.

  PMID: 30203473 BACKGROUND

• Englert M, Barsties V Latoszek B, Maryn Y, Behlau M. Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index, Version 03.01, to the Brazilian Portuguese Language. J Voice. 2021 Jan;35(1):160.e15-160.e21. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2019.07.024. Epub 2019 Aug 29.

  PMID: 31474432 BACKGROUND

• Faham M, Laukkanen AM, Ikavalko T, Rantala L, Geneid A, Holmqvist-Jamsen S, Ruusuvirta K, Pirila S. Acoustic Voice Quality Index as a Potential Tool for Voice Screening. J Voice. 2021 Mar;35(2):226-232. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2019.08.017. Epub 2019 Sep 30.

  PMID: 31582330 BACKGROUND

• Yesilli-Puzella G, Tadihan-Ozkan E, Maryn Y. Validation and Test-Retest Reliability of Acoustic Voice Quality Index Version 02.06 in the Turkish Language. J Voice. 2022 Sep;36(5):736.e25-736.e32. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2020.08.021. Epub 2020 Sep 20.

  PMID: 32962941 BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Jaw, Edentulous

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Jaw Diseases; Musculoskeletal Diseases; Stomatognathic Diseases; Mouth, Edentulous; Mouth Diseases; Tooth Diseases

Study Design

• Study Type: observational
• Observational Model: COHORT
• Time Perspective: PROSPECTIVE
• Sponsor Type: OTHER
• Responsible Party: PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
• PI Title: Assist. Prof.

Study Record Dates

• First Submitted: January 11, 2023
• First Posted: January 20, 2023
• Study Start: March 1, 2023
• Primary Completion: April 1, 2024
• Study Completion: June 1, 2024
• Last Updated: January 8, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-01

Locations

TU (1)