NCT05690178

Brief Summary

The main objective of the study was to assess the impact of deep tissue massage on subjective and objective parameters in a group of office workers with chronic low back pain. Specific objectives:

  • Assessment of the impact of deep tissue massage on the level of pain
  • Assessment of the impact of deep tissue massage on the level of disability
  • Assessment of the impact of deep tissue massage on the mobility of the lumbar spine
  • Assessment of the effect of deep tissue massage on the discomfort threshold of tissue compression in the area of the erector spinae muscle
  • Assessment of the impact of deep tissue massage on the biophysical parameters of the soft tissues of the erector spinae muscle
  • Evaluation of the impact of deep tissue massage on the bioelectric potentials of the erector spinae muscle during everyday activities and the flexion-relaxation test Hypotheses:
  • Deep tissue massage will reduce the level of pain in the lumbar spine
  • Deep tissue massage will reduce the level of disability
  • Deep tissue massage will increase the range of motion of the lumbar spine in all directions
  • Deep tissue massage will reduce the threshold of discomfort when compressing the soft tissues of the erector spinae muscle
  • Deep tissue massage will reduce muscle tone and stiffness and increase the elasticity of the back extensor muscle
  • Deep tissue massage will increase the bioelectrical potentials of the erector spinae muscle while performing tests of activities of daily living
  • Deep tissue massage will reduce the value of the flexion-relaxation test

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
40

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2021

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2021

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 20, 2021

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 20, 2021

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 1, 2023

Completed
18 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 19, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

August 9, 2023

Status Verified

August 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

2 months

First QC Date

January 1, 2023

Last Update Submit

August 7, 2023

Conditions

Keywords

Chronic Low-back PainRange of motionPressure pain thresholdMyotonMuscle propertiesSurface electromyographyOswestry Disability IndexRolland Morris Disability QuestionnaireDisabilityVisual Analogue ScaleDeep Tissue MassageManual Therapy

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (94)

  • Lumbar anterior flexion (PRE)

    Electrogoniometric measurement of the angular range of motion the day before the therapy

    Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

  • Lumbar anterior flexion (POST)

    Electrogoniometric measurement of the angular range of motion the day after the therapy

    Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

  • Lumbar posterior flexion (PRE)

    Electrogoniometric measurement of the angular range of motion the day before the therapy

    Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

  • Lumbar posterior flexion (POST)

    Electrogoniometric measurement of the angular range of motion the day after the therapy

    Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

  • Lumbar right flexion (PRE)

    Electrogoniometric measurement of the angular range of motion the day before the therapy

    Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

  • Lumbar right flexion (POST)

    Electrogoniometric measurement of the angular range of motion the day after the therapy

    Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

  • Lumbar left flexion (PRE)

    Electrogoniometric measurement of the angular range of motion the day before the therapy

    Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

  • Lumbar left flexion (POST)

    Electrogoniometric measurement of the angular range of motion the day after the therapy

    Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

  • Lumbar right rotation (PRE)

    Electrogoniometric measurement of the angular range of motion the day before the therapy

    Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

  • Lumbar right rotation (POST)

    Electrogoniometric measurement of the angular range of motion the day after the therapy

    Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

  • Lumbar left rotation (PRE)

    Electrogoniometric measurement of the angular range of motion the day before the therapy

    Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

  • Lumbar left rotation (POST)

    Electrogoniometric measurement of the angular range of motion the day after the therapy

    Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

  • Stiffness (S) of the right longissimus muscle (PRE)

    Myotonometer examination of soft tissue properties the day before the intervention

    Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

  • Stiffness (S) of the right longissimus muscle (POST)

    Myotonometer examination of soft tissue properties the day after the therapy

    Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

  • Stiffness (S) of the left longissimus muscle (PRE)

    Myotonometer examination of soft tissue properties the day before the therapy

    Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

  • Stiffness (S) of the left longissimus muscle (POST)

    Myotonometer examination of soft tissue properties the day after the therapy

    Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

  • Elasticity (D) of the right longissimus muscle (PRE)

    Myotonometer examination of soft tissue properties the day before the therapy

    Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

  • Elasticity (D) of the right longissimus muscle (POST)

    Myotonometer examination of soft tissue properties the day after the therapy

    Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

  • Elasticity (D) of the left longissimus muscle (PRE)

    Myotonometer examination of soft tissue properties the day before the therapy

    Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

  • Elasticity (D) of the left longissimus muscle (POST)

    Myotonometer examination of soft tissue properties the day after the therapy

    Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

  • Muscle tone (F) of the right longissimus muscle (PRE)

    Myotonometer examination of soft tissue properties the day before the therapy

    Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

  • Muscle tone (F) of the right longissimus muscle (POST)

    Myotonometer examination of soft tissue properties the day after the therapy

    Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

  • Muscle tone (F) of the left longissimus muscle (PRE)

    Myotonometer examination of soft tissue properties the day before the therapy

    Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

  • Muscle tone (F) of the left longissimus muscle (POST)

    Myotonometer examination of soft tissue properties the day after the therapy

    Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

  • Pressure pain threshold (PPT) of the right longissimus muscle (PRE)

    Examination of the first discomfort threshold using an algometer the day before the therapy

    Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

  • Pressure pain threshold (PPT) of the right longissimus muscle (POST)

    Examination of the first discomfort threshold using an algometer the day after the therapy

    Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

  • Pressure pain threshold (PPT) of the left longissimus muscle (PRE)

    Examination of the first discomfort threshold using an algometer the day before the therapy

    Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

  • Pressure pain threshold (PPT) of the left longissimus muscle (POST)

    Examination of the first discomfort threshold using an algometer the day after the therapy

    Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

  • EMG - MVC for right longissimus muscle (PRE)

    Electromyographic measurements of maximal voluntary contraction of the right longissimus muscle the day before therapy

    Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

  • EMG - MVC for right longissimus muscle (POST)

    Electromyographic measurements of maximal voluntary contraction of the right longissimus muscle the day after the therapy

    Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

  • EMG - MVC for left longissimus muscle (PRE)

    Electromyographic measurements of maximal voluntary contraction of the left longissimus muscle the day before the therapy

    Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

  • EMG - MVC for left longissimus muscle (POST)

    Electromyographic measurements of maximal voluntary contraction of the left longissimus muscle the day after the therapy

    Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

  • EMG - MVC for right iliocostalis muscle (PRE)

    Electromyographic measurements of maximal voluntary contraction of the left longissimus muscle the day before the therapy

    Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

  • EMG - MVC for right iliocostalis muscle (POST)

    Electromyographic measurements of maximal voluntary contraction of the right iliocostalis muscle the day after the therapy

    Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

  • EMG - MVC for left iliocostalis muscle (PRE)

    Electromyographic measurements of maximal voluntary contraction of the left longissimus muscle the day before the therapy

    Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

  • EMG - MVC for left iliocostalis muscle (POST)

    Electromyographic measurements of maximal voluntary contraction of the left longissimus muscle the day after the therapy

    Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

  • EMG - MVC for right multifidus muscle (PRE)

    Electromyographic measurements of maximal voluntary contraction of the right multifidus muscle the day before the therapy

    Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

  • EMG - MVC for right multifidus muscle (POST)

    Electromyographic measurements of maximal voluntary contraction of the right multifidus muscle the day after the therapy

    Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

  • EMG - MVC for left multifidus muscle (PRE)

    Electromyographic measurements of maximal voluntary contraction of the left multifidus muscle the day before the therapy

    Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

  • EMG - MVC for left multifidus muscle (POST)

    Electromyographic measurements of maximal voluntary contraction of the left multifidus muscle the day after the therapy

    Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

  • EMG - FR test for right longissimus muscle (PRE)

    Electromyographic measurements of the right longissimus muscle during the Flexion-Relaxation test the day before the therapy

    Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

  • EMG - FR test for right longissimus muscle (POST)

    Electromyographic measurements of the right longissimus muscle during the Flexion-Relaxation test the day after the therapy

    Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

  • EMG - FR test for left longissimus muscle (PRE)

    Electromyographic measurements of the left longissimus muscle during the Flexion-Relaxation test the day before the therapy

    Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

  • EMG - FR test for left longissimus muscle (POST)

    Electromyographic measurements of the left longissimus muscle during the Flexion-Relaxation test the day after the therapy

    Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

  • EMG - FR test for right iliocostalis muscle (PRE)

    Electromyographic measurements of the left longissimus muscle during the Flexion-Relaxation test the day before the therapy

    Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

  • EMG - FR test for right iliocostalis muscle (POST)

    Electromyographic measurements of the left longissimus muscle during the Flexion-Relaxation test the day after the therapy

    Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

  • EMG - FR test for left iliocostalis muscle (PRE)

    Electromyographic measurements of the left longissimus muscle during the Flexion-Relaxation test the day before the therapy

    Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

  • EMG - FR test for left iliocostalis muscle (POST)

    Electromyographic measurements of the left longissimus muscle during the Flexion-Relaxation test the day after the therapy

    Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

  • EMG - FR test for right multifidus muscle (PRE)

    Electromyographic measurements of the left longissimus muscle during the Flexion-Relaxation test the day before the therapy

    Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

  • EMG - FR test for right multifidus muscle (POST)

    Electromyographic measurements of the left longissimus muscle during the Flexion-Relaxation test the day after the therapy

    Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

  • EMG - FR test for left multifidus muscle (PRE)

    Electromyographic measurements of the left longissimus muscle during the Flexion-Relaxation test the day before the therapy

    Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

  • EMG - FR test for left multifidus muscle (POST)

    Electromyographic measurements of the left multifidus muscle during the Flexion-Relaxation test the day after the therapy

    Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

  • EMG - sitting and standing test for right longissimus muscle (PRE)

    Electromyographic measurements of the left multifidus muscle during sitting and standing test the day before the therapy

    Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

  • EMG - sitting and standing test for right longissimus muscle (POST)

    Electromyographic measurements of the right longissimus muscle during sitting and standing test the day after the therapy

    Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

  • EMG - sitting and standing test for left longissimus muscle (PRE)

    Electromyographic measurements of the left longissimus muscle during sitting and standing test the day before the therapy

    Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

  • EMG - sitting and standing test for left longissimus muscle (POST)

    Electromyographic measurements of the left longissimus muscle during sitting and standing test the day after the therapy

    Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

  • EMG - sitting and standing test for right iliocostalis muscle (PRE)

    Electromyographic measurements of the right iliocostalis muscle during sitting and standing test the day before the therapy

    Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

  • EMG - sitting and standing test for right iliocostalis muscle (POST)

    Electromyographic measurements of the right iliocostalis muscle during sitting and standing test the day after the therapy

    Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

  • EMG - sitting and standing test for left iliocostalis muscle (PRE)

    Electromyographic measurements of the left iliocostalis muscle during sitting and standing test the day before the therapy

    Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

  • EMG - sitting and standing test for left iliocostalis muscle (POST)

    Electromyographic measurements of the left iliocostalis muscle during sitting and standing test the day after the therapy

    Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

  • EMG - sitting and standing test for right multifidus muscle (PRE)

    Electromyographic measurements of the right multifidus muscle during sitting and standing test the day before the therapy

    Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

  • EMG - sitting and standing test for right multifidus muscle (POST)

    Electromyographic measurements of the right multifidus muscle during sitting and standing test the day after the therapy

    Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

  • EMG - sitting and standing test for left multifidus muscle (PRE)

    Electromyographic measurements of the left multifidus muscle during sitting and standing test the day before the therapy

    Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

  • EMG - sitting and standing test for left multifidus muscle (POST)

    Electromyographic measurements of the left multifidus muscle during sitting and standing test the day after the therapy

    Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

  • EMG - weight holding test (1 kg) for right longissimus muscle (PRE)

    Electromyographic measurements of the right longissimus muscle during the weight holding test (1kg) the day before the therapy

    Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

  • EMG - weight holding test (1 kg) for right longissimus muscle (POST)

    Electromyographic measurements of the right longissimus muscle during the weight holding test (1kg) the day after the therapy

    Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

  • EMG - weight holding test (1 kg) for left longissimus muscle (PRE)

    Electromyographic measurements of the left longissimus muscle during the weight holding test (1kg) the day before the therapy

    Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

  • EMG - weight holding test (1 kg) for left longissimus muscle (POST)

    Electromyographic measurements of the left longissimus muscle during the weight holding test (1kg) the day after the therapy

    Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

  • EMG - weight holding test (1 kg) for right iliocostalis muscle (PRE)

    Electromyographic measurements of the right iliocostalis muscle during the weight holding test (1kg) the day before the therapy

    Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

  • EMG - weight holding test (1 kg) for right iliocostalis muscle (POST)

    Electromyographic measurements of the right iliocostalis muscle during the weight holding test (1kg) the day after the therapy

    Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

  • EMG - weight holding test (1 kg) for left iliocostalis muscle (PRE)

    Electromyographic measurements of the left iliocostalis muscle during the weight holding test (1kg) the day before the therapy

    Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

  • EMG - weight holding test (1 kg) for left iliocostalis muscle (POST)

    Electromyographic measurements of the left iliocostalis muscle during the weight holding test (1kg) the day after the therapy

    Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

  • EMG - weight holding test (1 kg) for right multifidus muscle (PRE)

    Electromyographic measurements of the right multifidus muscle during the weight holding test (1kg) the day before the therapy

    Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

  • EMG - weight holding test (1 kg) for right multifidus muscle (POST)

    Electromyographic measurements of the right multifidus muscle during the weight holding test (1kg) the day after the therapy

    Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

  • EMG - weight holding test (1 kg) for left multifidus muscle (PRE)

    Electromyographic measurements of the left multifidus muscle during the weight holding test (1kg) the day before the therapy

    Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

  • EMG - weight holding test (1 kg) for left multifidus muscle (POST)

    Electromyographic measurements of the left multifidus muscle during the weight holding test (1kg) the day after the therapy

    Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

  • EMG - weight holding test (2 kg) for right longissimus muscle (PRE)

    Electromyographic measurements of the right longissimus muscle during the weight holding test (1kg) the day before the therapy

    Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

  • EMG - weight holding test (2 kg) for right longissimus muscle (POST)

    Electromyographic measurements of the right longissimus muscle during the weight holding test (1kg) the day after the therapy

    Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

  • EMG - weight holding test (2 kg) for left longissimus muscle (PRE)

    Electromyographic measurements of the left longissimus muscle during the weight holding test (1kg) the day before the therapy

    Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

  • EMG - weight holding test (2 kg) for left longissimus muscle (POST)

    Electromyographic measurements of the left longissimus muscle during the weight holding test (1kg) the day after the therapy

    Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

  • EMG - weight holding test (2 kg) for right iliocostalis muscle (PRE)

    Electromyographic measurements of the right iliocostalis muscle during the weight holding test (1kg) the day before the therapy

    Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

  • EMG - weight holding test (2 kg) for right iliocostalis muscle (POST)

    Electromyographic measurements of the right iliocostalis muscle during the weight holding test (1kg) the day after the therapy

    Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

  • EMG - weight holding test (2 kg) for left iliocostalis muscle (PRE)

    Electromyographic measurements of the left iliocostalis muscle during the weight holding test (1kg) the day before the therapy

    Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

  • EMG - weight holding test (2 kg) for left iliocostalis muscle (POST)

    Electromyographic measurements of the left iliocostalis muscle during the weight holding test (1kg) the day after the therapy

    Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

  • EMG - weight holding test (2 kg) for right multifidus muscle (PRE)

    Electromyographic measurements of the right multifidus muscle during the weight holding test (1kg) the day before the therapy

    Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

  • EMG - weight holding test (2 kg) for right multifidus muscle (POST)

    Electromyographic measurements of the right multifidus muscle during the weight holding test (1kg) the day after the therapy

    Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

  • EMG - weight holding test (2 kg) for left multifidus muscle (PRE)

    Electromyographic measurements of the left multifidus muscle during the weight holding test (1kg) the day before the therapy

    Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

  • EMG - weight holding test (2 kg) for left multifidus muscle (POST)

    Electromyographic measurements of the left multifidus muscle during the weight holding test (1kg) the day after the therapy

    Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

  • Revised Oswestry Pain Questionnaire (PRE)

    Revised Oswestry Pain Questionnaire (ODI) - the day before therapy. The minimum score is 0, while the maximum is 50, which proves 100% disability. A higher result is worse and proves the patient's disability in everyday activities.

    Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

  • Revised Oswestry Pain Questionnaire (POST)

    Revised Oswestry Pain Questionnaire (ODI) - the day after therapy. The minimum score is 0, while the maximum is 50, which proves 100% disability. A higher result is worse and proves the patient's disability in everyday activities.

    Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

  • Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (PRE)

    Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) - the day before therapy. The minimum score is 0, while the maximum is 24. The higher the score, the worse it is and it illustrates the poor functional condition of the examined person.

    Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

  • Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (POST)

    Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) - the day after therapy. The minimum score is 0, while the maximum is 24. The higher the score, the worse it is and it illustrates the poor functional condition of the examined person.

    Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

  • Visual-Analog Scale (PRE)

    Visual-Analog Scale (VAS) - the day before therapy. The minimum score is 0 and the maximum score is 10. The higher the score, the worse it is and it reflects the subjective level of pain experienced.

    Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

  • Visual-Analog Scale (POST)

    Visual-Analog Scale (VAS) - the day after therapy. The minimum score is 0 and the maximum score is 10. The higher the score, the worse it is and it reflects the subjective level of pain experienced.

    Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.

Study Arms (2)

DTM group

EXPERIMENTAL

This group of participants (N=20) received Deep Tissue Massage therapy.

Other: Deep Tissue Massage

Control group

NO INTERVENTION

This group of participants (N=20) did not receive any intervention.

Interventions

The Deep Tissue Massage lasted 45 minutes. The entire therapy included 4 treatments over a period of 2 weeks. The interval between treatments was 3 days. The conducted therapy included techniques for: quadratus lumborum muscle, erector spinae muscle, thoracolumbar fascia, iliopsoas muscle. All techniques were performed on both sides of the patient's body.

DTM group

Eligibility Criteria

Age30 Years - 60 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Chronic Low-Back Pain
  • office worker

You may not qualify if:

  • spine surgeries
  • cauda equina syndrome
  • cancer
  • pain or motor and sensory deficits in the lower extremities below the level of the knee
  • various therapies to treat chronic low-back pain

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Poznan University of Physical Education, Department of Biology and Anatomy

Poznan, Wielkopolska, 61-871, Poland

Location

Related Publications (24)

  • Willard FH, Vleeming A, Schuenke MD, Danneels L, Schleip R. The thoracolumbar fascia: anatomy, function and clinical considerations. J Anat. 2012 Dec;221(6):507-36. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7580.2012.01511.x. Epub 2012 May 27.

    PMID: 22630613BACKGROUND
  • Williams ACC, Craig KD. Updating the definition of pain. Pain. 2016 Nov;157(11):2420-2423. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000613. No abstract available.

    PMID: 27200490BACKGROUND
  • Schuenke MD, Vleeming A, Van Hoof T, Willard FH. A description of the lumbar interfascial triangle and its relation with the lateral raphe: anatomical constituents of load transfer through the lateral margin of the thoracolumbar fascia. J Anat. 2012 Dec;221(6):568-76. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7580.2012.01517.x. Epub 2012 May 15.

    PMID: 22582887BACKGROUND
  • Tesarz J, Hoheisel U, Wiedenhofer B, Mense S. Sensory innervation of the thoracolumbar fascia in rats and humans. Neuroscience. 2011 Oct 27;194:302-8. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2011.07.066. Epub 2011 Aug 2.

    PMID: 21839150BACKGROUND
  • Saper RB, Lemaster C, Delitto A, Sherman KJ, Herman PM, Sadikova E, Stevans J, Keosaian JE, Cerrada CJ, Femia AL, Roseen EJ, Gardiner P, Gergen Barnett K, Faulkner C, Weinberg J. Yoga, Physical Therapy, or Education for Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Noninferiority Trial. Ann Intern Med. 2017 Jul 18;167(2):85-94. doi: 10.7326/M16-2579. Epub 2017 Jun 20.

    PMID: 28631003BACKGROUND
  • Nakipoglu GF, Karagoz A, Ozgirgin N. The biomechanics of the lumbosacral region in acute and chronic low back pain patients. Pain Physician. 2008 Jul-Aug;11(4):505-11.

    PMID: 18690279BACKGROUND
  • Marshall PWM, Schabrun S, Knox MF. Physical activity and the mediating effect of fear, depression, anxiety, and catastrophizing on pain related disability in people with chronic low back pain. PLoS One. 2017 Jul 7;12(7):e0180788. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0180788. eCollection 2017.

    PMID: 28686644BACKGROUND
  • Maher C, Underwood M, Buchbinder R. Non-specific low back pain. Lancet. 2017 Feb 18;389(10070):736-747. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30970-9. Epub 2016 Oct 11.

    PMID: 27745712BACKGROUND
  • Le Huec JC, Thompson W, Mohsinaly Y, Barrey C, Faundez A. Sagittal balance of the spine. Eur Spine J. 2019 Sep;28(9):1889-1905. doi: 10.1007/s00586-019-06083-1. Epub 2019 Jul 22.

    PMID: 31332569BACKGROUND
  • Koren Y, Kalichman L. Deep tissue massage: What are we talking about? J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2018 Apr;22(2):247-251. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2017.05.006. Epub 2017 May 17.

    PMID: 29861215BACKGROUND
  • Cai XY, Sun MS, Huang YP, Liu ZX, Liu CJ, Du CF, Yang Q. Biomechanical Effect of L4 -L5 Intervertebral Disc Degeneration on the Lower Lumbar Spine: A Finite Element Study. Orthop Surg. 2020 Jun;12(3):917-930. doi: 10.1111/os.12703. Epub 2020 May 31.

    PMID: 32476282BACKGROUND
  • Bogduk N. On the definitions and physiology of back pain, referred pain, and radicular pain. Pain. 2009 Dec 15;147(1-3):17-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2009.08.020. Epub 2009 Sep 16. No abstract available.

    PMID: 19762151BACKGROUND
  • Hansen AE, Marcus NJ. Is It Time to Consider Soft Tissue as a Pain Generator in Nonspecific Low Back Pain? Pain Med. 2016 Nov;17(11):1969-1970. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnw204. Epub 2016 Aug 27. No abstract available.

    PMID: 27570247BACKGROUND
  • Zheng Z, Wang J, Gao Q, Hou J, Ma L, Jiang C, Chen G. Therapeutic evaluation of lumbar tender point deep massage for chronic non-specific low back pain. J Tradit Chin Med. 2012 Dec;32(4):534-7. doi: 10.1016/s0254-6272(13)60066-7.

  • Majchrzycki M, Kocur P, Kotwicki T. Deep tissue massage and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for low back pain: a prospective randomized trial. ScientificWorldJournal. 2014 Feb 23;2014:287597. doi: 10.1155/2014/287597. eCollection 2014.

  • van den Dolder PA, Roberts DL. A trial into the effectiveness of soft tissue massage in the treatment of shoulder pain. Aust J Physiother. 2003;49(3):183-8. doi: 10.1016/s0004-9514(14)60238-5.

  • van den Dolder PA, Ferreira PH, Refshauge KM. Effectiveness of Soft Tissue Massage for Nonspecific Shoulder Pain: Randomized Controlled Trial. Phys Ther. 2015 Nov;95(11):1467-77. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20140350. Epub 2015 May 28.

  • Furlan AD, Giraldo M, Baskwill A, Irvin E, Imamura M. Massage for low-back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Sep 1;2015(9):CD001929. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001929.pub3.

  • Seffrin CB, Cattano NM, Reed MA, Gardiner-Shires AM. Instrument-Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization: A Systematic Review and Effect-Size Analysis. J Athl Train. 2019 Jul;54(7):808-821. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-481-17. Epub 2019 Jul 19.

  • Best TM, Hunter R, Wilcox A, Haq F. Effectiveness of sports massage for recovery of skeletal muscle from strenuous exercise. Clin J Sport Med. 2008 Sep;18(5):446-60. doi: 10.1097/JSM.0b013e31818837a1.

  • Bervoets DC, Luijsterburg PA, Alessie JJ, Buijs MJ, Verhagen AP. Massage therapy has short-term benefits for people with common musculoskeletal disorders compared to no treatment: a systematic review. J Physiother. 2015 Jul;61(3):106-16. doi: 10.1016/j.jphys.2015.05.018. Epub 2015 Jun 17.

  • Kassolik K, Andrzejewski W, Brzozowski M, Wilk I, Gorecka-Midura L, Ostrowska B, Krzyzanowski D, Kurpas D. Comparison of massage based on the tensegrity principle and classic massage in treating chronic shoulder pain. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2013 Sep;36(7):418-27. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2013.06.004. Epub 2013 Jul 25.

  • Romanowski MW, Spiritovic M, Rutkowski R, Dudek A, Samborski W, Straburzynska-Lupa A. Comparison of Deep Tissue Massage and Therapeutic Massage for Lower Back Pain, Disease Activity, and Functional Capacity of Ankylosing Spondylitis Patients: A Randomized Clinical Pilot Study. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2017;2017:9894128. doi: 10.1155/2017/9894128. Epub 2017 Aug 6.

  • Wendt M, Rubach J, Waszak M. Short-term effect after soft tissue manipulation session on subjective and objective parameters in office workers with chronic low back pain: A randomized clinical trial. PLoS One. 2025 Nov 21;20(11):e0336685. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0336685. eCollection 2025.

Related Links

Study Officials

  • MichaÅ‚ Wendt, PhD

    Poznan University of Physical Education, Department of Biology and Anatomy

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
Triple (participant, researcher, outcome assessor). Participants did not know which study group they belonged to. Each participant drew a number that was characteristic of a given research group (experimental DTM group or control group). The researcher also did not know which group the participant belonged to (he only used the participant number). Outcome assessor did not know which group was experimental and which was control (they were marked with numbers instead of names). The coordinator supervised the proper course of the study.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: The first step was recruitment. Based on the qualifying and disqualifying criteria, 40 people were selected. Each participant was randomly assigned to a specific group (Deep Tissue Massage (DTM) experimental group or control group). Initial measurements were collected from all participants. Participants in the DTM group had therapy, while those in the control group had no therapy. The therapist was responsible for performing the DTM therapy. Each participant in the experimental group received 4 treatments (45 minutes each, 3 days between them) over a period of 2 weeks. After the end of the whole therapy, final measurements were made. The researcher was responsible for taking measurements for each participant. The person acting as the coordinator supervised the proper course of the research. The collected data was analyzed by a person evaluating the results.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 1, 2023

First Posted

January 19, 2023

Study Start

September 1, 2021

Primary Completion

October 20, 2021

Study Completion

October 20, 2021

Last Updated

August 9, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-08

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

University IPD sharing platform is under preparation. All data will also be available to researchers via the principal researcher's email (wendt@awf.poznan.pl) or Research Gate website.

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR, ANALYTIC CODE
Time Frame
Data will be available from May/June 2023.
Access Criteria
Available to all researchers.
More information

Locations