Deep Tissue Massage in Office Workers With Chronic Low Back Pain
Effect of Deep Tissue Massage on Subjective and Objective Parameters in Office Workers With Chronic Low Back Pain
1 other identifier
interventional
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The main objective of the study was to assess the impact of deep tissue massage on subjective and objective parameters in a group of office workers with chronic low back pain. Specific objectives:
- Assessment of the impact of deep tissue massage on the level of pain
- Assessment of the impact of deep tissue massage on the level of disability
- Assessment of the impact of deep tissue massage on the mobility of the lumbar spine
- Assessment of the effect of deep tissue massage on the discomfort threshold of tissue compression in the area of the erector spinae muscle
- Assessment of the impact of deep tissue massage on the biophysical parameters of the soft tissues of the erector spinae muscle
- Evaluation of the impact of deep tissue massage on the bioelectric potentials of the erector spinae muscle during everyday activities and the flexion-relaxation test Hypotheses:
- Deep tissue massage will reduce the level of pain in the lumbar spine
- Deep tissue massage will reduce the level of disability
- Deep tissue massage will increase the range of motion of the lumbar spine in all directions
- Deep tissue massage will reduce the threshold of discomfort when compressing the soft tissues of the erector spinae muscle
- Deep tissue massage will reduce muscle tone and stiffness and increase the elasticity of the back extensor muscle
- Deep tissue massage will increase the bioelectrical potentials of the erector spinae muscle while performing tests of activities of daily living
- Deep tissue massage will reduce the value of the flexion-relaxation test
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2021
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 20, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 20, 2021
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 1, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 19, 2023
CompletedAugust 9, 2023
August 1, 2023
2 months
January 1, 2023
August 7, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (94)
Lumbar anterior flexion (PRE)
Electrogoniometric measurement of the angular range of motion the day before the therapy
Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.
Lumbar anterior flexion (POST)
Electrogoniometric measurement of the angular range of motion the day after the therapy
Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.
Lumbar posterior flexion (PRE)
Electrogoniometric measurement of the angular range of motion the day before the therapy
Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.
Lumbar posterior flexion (POST)
Electrogoniometric measurement of the angular range of motion the day after the therapy
Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.
Lumbar right flexion (PRE)
Electrogoniometric measurement of the angular range of motion the day before the therapy
Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.
Lumbar right flexion (POST)
Electrogoniometric measurement of the angular range of motion the day after the therapy
Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.
Lumbar left flexion (PRE)
Electrogoniometric measurement of the angular range of motion the day before the therapy
Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.
Lumbar left flexion (POST)
Electrogoniometric measurement of the angular range of motion the day after the therapy
Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.
Lumbar right rotation (PRE)
Electrogoniometric measurement of the angular range of motion the day before the therapy
Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.
Lumbar right rotation (POST)
Electrogoniometric measurement of the angular range of motion the day after the therapy
Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.
Lumbar left rotation (PRE)
Electrogoniometric measurement of the angular range of motion the day before the therapy
Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.
Lumbar left rotation (POST)
Electrogoniometric measurement of the angular range of motion the day after the therapy
Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.
Stiffness (S) of the right longissimus muscle (PRE)
Myotonometer examination of soft tissue properties the day before the intervention
Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.
Stiffness (S) of the right longissimus muscle (POST)
Myotonometer examination of soft tissue properties the day after the therapy
Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.
Stiffness (S) of the left longissimus muscle (PRE)
Myotonometer examination of soft tissue properties the day before the therapy
Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.
Stiffness (S) of the left longissimus muscle (POST)
Myotonometer examination of soft tissue properties the day after the therapy
Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.
Elasticity (D) of the right longissimus muscle (PRE)
Myotonometer examination of soft tissue properties the day before the therapy
Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.
Elasticity (D) of the right longissimus muscle (POST)
Myotonometer examination of soft tissue properties the day after the therapy
Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.
Elasticity (D) of the left longissimus muscle (PRE)
Myotonometer examination of soft tissue properties the day before the therapy
Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.
Elasticity (D) of the left longissimus muscle (POST)
Myotonometer examination of soft tissue properties the day after the therapy
Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.
Muscle tone (F) of the right longissimus muscle (PRE)
Myotonometer examination of soft tissue properties the day before the therapy
Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.
Muscle tone (F) of the right longissimus muscle (POST)
Myotonometer examination of soft tissue properties the day after the therapy
Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.
Muscle tone (F) of the left longissimus muscle (PRE)
Myotonometer examination of soft tissue properties the day before the therapy
Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.
Muscle tone (F) of the left longissimus muscle (POST)
Myotonometer examination of soft tissue properties the day after the therapy
Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.
Pressure pain threshold (PPT) of the right longissimus muscle (PRE)
Examination of the first discomfort threshold using an algometer the day before the therapy
Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.
Pressure pain threshold (PPT) of the right longissimus muscle (POST)
Examination of the first discomfort threshold using an algometer the day after the therapy
Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.
Pressure pain threshold (PPT) of the left longissimus muscle (PRE)
Examination of the first discomfort threshold using an algometer the day before the therapy
Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.
Pressure pain threshold (PPT) of the left longissimus muscle (POST)
Examination of the first discomfort threshold using an algometer the day after the therapy
Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.
EMG - MVC for right longissimus muscle (PRE)
Electromyographic measurements of maximal voluntary contraction of the right longissimus muscle the day before therapy
Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.
EMG - MVC for right longissimus muscle (POST)
Electromyographic measurements of maximal voluntary contraction of the right longissimus muscle the day after the therapy
Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.
EMG - MVC for left longissimus muscle (PRE)
Electromyographic measurements of maximal voluntary contraction of the left longissimus muscle the day before the therapy
Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.
EMG - MVC for left longissimus muscle (POST)
Electromyographic measurements of maximal voluntary contraction of the left longissimus muscle the day after the therapy
Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.
EMG - MVC for right iliocostalis muscle (PRE)
Electromyographic measurements of maximal voluntary contraction of the left longissimus muscle the day before the therapy
Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.
EMG - MVC for right iliocostalis muscle (POST)
Electromyographic measurements of maximal voluntary contraction of the right iliocostalis muscle the day after the therapy
Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.
EMG - MVC for left iliocostalis muscle (PRE)
Electromyographic measurements of maximal voluntary contraction of the left longissimus muscle the day before the therapy
Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.
EMG - MVC for left iliocostalis muscle (POST)
Electromyographic measurements of maximal voluntary contraction of the left longissimus muscle the day after the therapy
Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.
EMG - MVC for right multifidus muscle (PRE)
Electromyographic measurements of maximal voluntary contraction of the right multifidus muscle the day before the therapy
Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.
EMG - MVC for right multifidus muscle (POST)
Electromyographic measurements of maximal voluntary contraction of the right multifidus muscle the day after the therapy
Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.
EMG - MVC for left multifidus muscle (PRE)
Electromyographic measurements of maximal voluntary contraction of the left multifidus muscle the day before the therapy
Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.
EMG - MVC for left multifidus muscle (POST)
Electromyographic measurements of maximal voluntary contraction of the left multifidus muscle the day after the therapy
Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.
EMG - FR test for right longissimus muscle (PRE)
Electromyographic measurements of the right longissimus muscle during the Flexion-Relaxation test the day before the therapy
Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.
EMG - FR test for right longissimus muscle (POST)
Electromyographic measurements of the right longissimus muscle during the Flexion-Relaxation test the day after the therapy
Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.
EMG - FR test for left longissimus muscle (PRE)
Electromyographic measurements of the left longissimus muscle during the Flexion-Relaxation test the day before the therapy
Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.
EMG - FR test for left longissimus muscle (POST)
Electromyographic measurements of the left longissimus muscle during the Flexion-Relaxation test the day after the therapy
Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.
EMG - FR test for right iliocostalis muscle (PRE)
Electromyographic measurements of the left longissimus muscle during the Flexion-Relaxation test the day before the therapy
Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.
EMG - FR test for right iliocostalis muscle (POST)
Electromyographic measurements of the left longissimus muscle during the Flexion-Relaxation test the day after the therapy
Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.
EMG - FR test for left iliocostalis muscle (PRE)
Electromyographic measurements of the left longissimus muscle during the Flexion-Relaxation test the day before the therapy
Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.
EMG - FR test for left iliocostalis muscle (POST)
Electromyographic measurements of the left longissimus muscle during the Flexion-Relaxation test the day after the therapy
Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.
EMG - FR test for right multifidus muscle (PRE)
Electromyographic measurements of the left longissimus muscle during the Flexion-Relaxation test the day before the therapy
Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.
EMG - FR test for right multifidus muscle (POST)
Electromyographic measurements of the left longissimus muscle during the Flexion-Relaxation test the day after the therapy
Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.
EMG - FR test for left multifidus muscle (PRE)
Electromyographic measurements of the left longissimus muscle during the Flexion-Relaxation test the day before the therapy
Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.
EMG - FR test for left multifidus muscle (POST)
Electromyographic measurements of the left multifidus muscle during the Flexion-Relaxation test the day after the therapy
Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.
EMG - sitting and standing test for right longissimus muscle (PRE)
Electromyographic measurements of the left multifidus muscle during sitting and standing test the day before the therapy
Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.
EMG - sitting and standing test for right longissimus muscle (POST)
Electromyographic measurements of the right longissimus muscle during sitting and standing test the day after the therapy
Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.
EMG - sitting and standing test for left longissimus muscle (PRE)
Electromyographic measurements of the left longissimus muscle during sitting and standing test the day before the therapy
Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.
EMG - sitting and standing test for left longissimus muscle (POST)
Electromyographic measurements of the left longissimus muscle during sitting and standing test the day after the therapy
Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.
EMG - sitting and standing test for right iliocostalis muscle (PRE)
Electromyographic measurements of the right iliocostalis muscle during sitting and standing test the day before the therapy
Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.
EMG - sitting and standing test for right iliocostalis muscle (POST)
Electromyographic measurements of the right iliocostalis muscle during sitting and standing test the day after the therapy
Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.
EMG - sitting and standing test for left iliocostalis muscle (PRE)
Electromyographic measurements of the left iliocostalis muscle during sitting and standing test the day before the therapy
Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.
EMG - sitting and standing test for left iliocostalis muscle (POST)
Electromyographic measurements of the left iliocostalis muscle during sitting and standing test the day after the therapy
Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.
EMG - sitting and standing test for right multifidus muscle (PRE)
Electromyographic measurements of the right multifidus muscle during sitting and standing test the day before the therapy
Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.
EMG - sitting and standing test for right multifidus muscle (POST)
Electromyographic measurements of the right multifidus muscle during sitting and standing test the day after the therapy
Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.
EMG - sitting and standing test for left multifidus muscle (PRE)
Electromyographic measurements of the left multifidus muscle during sitting and standing test the day before the therapy
Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.
EMG - sitting and standing test for left multifidus muscle (POST)
Electromyographic measurements of the left multifidus muscle during sitting and standing test the day after the therapy
Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.
EMG - weight holding test (1 kg) for right longissimus muscle (PRE)
Electromyographic measurements of the right longissimus muscle during the weight holding test (1kg) the day before the therapy
Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.
EMG - weight holding test (1 kg) for right longissimus muscle (POST)
Electromyographic measurements of the right longissimus muscle during the weight holding test (1kg) the day after the therapy
Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.
EMG - weight holding test (1 kg) for left longissimus muscle (PRE)
Electromyographic measurements of the left longissimus muscle during the weight holding test (1kg) the day before the therapy
Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.
EMG - weight holding test (1 kg) for left longissimus muscle (POST)
Electromyographic measurements of the left longissimus muscle during the weight holding test (1kg) the day after the therapy
Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.
EMG - weight holding test (1 kg) for right iliocostalis muscle (PRE)
Electromyographic measurements of the right iliocostalis muscle during the weight holding test (1kg) the day before the therapy
Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.
EMG - weight holding test (1 kg) for right iliocostalis muscle (POST)
Electromyographic measurements of the right iliocostalis muscle during the weight holding test (1kg) the day after the therapy
Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.
EMG - weight holding test (1 kg) for left iliocostalis muscle (PRE)
Electromyographic measurements of the left iliocostalis muscle during the weight holding test (1kg) the day before the therapy
Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.
EMG - weight holding test (1 kg) for left iliocostalis muscle (POST)
Electromyographic measurements of the left iliocostalis muscle during the weight holding test (1kg) the day after the therapy
Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.
EMG - weight holding test (1 kg) for right multifidus muscle (PRE)
Electromyographic measurements of the right multifidus muscle during the weight holding test (1kg) the day before the therapy
Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.
EMG - weight holding test (1 kg) for right multifidus muscle (POST)
Electromyographic measurements of the right multifidus muscle during the weight holding test (1kg) the day after the therapy
Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.
EMG - weight holding test (1 kg) for left multifidus muscle (PRE)
Electromyographic measurements of the left multifidus muscle during the weight holding test (1kg) the day before the therapy
Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.
EMG - weight holding test (1 kg) for left multifidus muscle (POST)
Electromyographic measurements of the left multifidus muscle during the weight holding test (1kg) the day after the therapy
Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.
EMG - weight holding test (2 kg) for right longissimus muscle (PRE)
Electromyographic measurements of the right longissimus muscle during the weight holding test (1kg) the day before the therapy
Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.
EMG - weight holding test (2 kg) for right longissimus muscle (POST)
Electromyographic measurements of the right longissimus muscle during the weight holding test (1kg) the day after the therapy
Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.
EMG - weight holding test (2 kg) for left longissimus muscle (PRE)
Electromyographic measurements of the left longissimus muscle during the weight holding test (1kg) the day before the therapy
Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.
EMG - weight holding test (2 kg) for left longissimus muscle (POST)
Electromyographic measurements of the left longissimus muscle during the weight holding test (1kg) the day after the therapy
Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.
EMG - weight holding test (2 kg) for right iliocostalis muscle (PRE)
Electromyographic measurements of the right iliocostalis muscle during the weight holding test (1kg) the day before the therapy
Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.
EMG - weight holding test (2 kg) for right iliocostalis muscle (POST)
Electromyographic measurements of the right iliocostalis muscle during the weight holding test (1kg) the day after the therapy
Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.
EMG - weight holding test (2 kg) for left iliocostalis muscle (PRE)
Electromyographic measurements of the left iliocostalis muscle during the weight holding test (1kg) the day before the therapy
Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.
EMG - weight holding test (2 kg) for left iliocostalis muscle (POST)
Electromyographic measurements of the left iliocostalis muscle during the weight holding test (1kg) the day after the therapy
Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.
EMG - weight holding test (2 kg) for right multifidus muscle (PRE)
Electromyographic measurements of the right multifidus muscle during the weight holding test (1kg) the day before the therapy
Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.
EMG - weight holding test (2 kg) for right multifidus muscle (POST)
Electromyographic measurements of the right multifidus muscle during the weight holding test (1kg) the day after the therapy
Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.
EMG - weight holding test (2 kg) for left multifidus muscle (PRE)
Electromyographic measurements of the left multifidus muscle during the weight holding test (1kg) the day before the therapy
Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.
EMG - weight holding test (2 kg) for left multifidus muscle (POST)
Electromyographic measurements of the left multifidus muscle during the weight holding test (1kg) the day after the therapy
Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.
Revised Oswestry Pain Questionnaire (PRE)
Revised Oswestry Pain Questionnaire (ODI) - the day before therapy. The minimum score is 0, while the maximum is 50, which proves 100% disability. A higher result is worse and proves the patient's disability in everyday activities.
Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.
Revised Oswestry Pain Questionnaire (POST)
Revised Oswestry Pain Questionnaire (ODI) - the day after therapy. The minimum score is 0, while the maximum is 50, which proves 100% disability. A higher result is worse and proves the patient's disability in everyday activities.
Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.
Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (PRE)
Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) - the day before therapy. The minimum score is 0, while the maximum is 24. The higher the score, the worse it is and it illustrates the poor functional condition of the examined person.
Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.
Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (POST)
Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) - the day after therapy. The minimum score is 0, while the maximum is 24. The higher the score, the worse it is and it illustrates the poor functional condition of the examined person.
Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.
Visual-Analog Scale (PRE)
Visual-Analog Scale (VAS) - the day before therapy. The minimum score is 0 and the maximum score is 10. The higher the score, the worse it is and it reflects the subjective level of pain experienced.
Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.
Visual-Analog Scale (POST)
Visual-Analog Scale (VAS) - the day after therapy. The minimum score is 0 and the maximum score is 10. The higher the score, the worse it is and it reflects the subjective level of pain experienced.
Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.
Study Arms (2)
DTM group
EXPERIMENTALThis group of participants (N=20) received Deep Tissue Massage therapy.
Control group
NO INTERVENTIONThis group of participants (N=20) did not receive any intervention.
Interventions
The Deep Tissue Massage lasted 45 minutes. The entire therapy included 4 treatments over a period of 2 weeks. The interval between treatments was 3 days. The conducted therapy included techniques for: quadratus lumborum muscle, erector spinae muscle, thoracolumbar fascia, iliopsoas muscle. All techniques were performed on both sides of the patient's body.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Chronic Low-Back Pain
- office worker
You may not qualify if:
- spine surgeries
- cauda equina syndrome
- cancer
- pain or motor and sensory deficits in the lower extremities below the level of the knee
- various therapies to treat chronic low-back pain
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Poznan University of Physical Education, Department of Biology and Anatomy
Poznan, Wielkopolska, 61-871, Poland
Related Publications (24)
Willard FH, Vleeming A, Schuenke MD, Danneels L, Schleip R. The thoracolumbar fascia: anatomy, function and clinical considerations. J Anat. 2012 Dec;221(6):507-36. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7580.2012.01511.x. Epub 2012 May 27.
PMID: 22630613BACKGROUNDWilliams ACC, Craig KD. Updating the definition of pain. Pain. 2016 Nov;157(11):2420-2423. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000613. No abstract available.
PMID: 27200490BACKGROUNDSchuenke MD, Vleeming A, Van Hoof T, Willard FH. A description of the lumbar interfascial triangle and its relation with the lateral raphe: anatomical constituents of load transfer through the lateral margin of the thoracolumbar fascia. J Anat. 2012 Dec;221(6):568-76. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7580.2012.01517.x. Epub 2012 May 15.
PMID: 22582887BACKGROUNDTesarz J, Hoheisel U, Wiedenhofer B, Mense S. Sensory innervation of the thoracolumbar fascia in rats and humans. Neuroscience. 2011 Oct 27;194:302-8. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2011.07.066. Epub 2011 Aug 2.
PMID: 21839150BACKGROUNDSaper RB, Lemaster C, Delitto A, Sherman KJ, Herman PM, Sadikova E, Stevans J, Keosaian JE, Cerrada CJ, Femia AL, Roseen EJ, Gardiner P, Gergen Barnett K, Faulkner C, Weinberg J. Yoga, Physical Therapy, or Education for Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Noninferiority Trial. Ann Intern Med. 2017 Jul 18;167(2):85-94. doi: 10.7326/M16-2579. Epub 2017 Jun 20.
PMID: 28631003BACKGROUNDNakipoglu GF, Karagoz A, Ozgirgin N. The biomechanics of the lumbosacral region in acute and chronic low back pain patients. Pain Physician. 2008 Jul-Aug;11(4):505-11.
PMID: 18690279BACKGROUNDMarshall PWM, Schabrun S, Knox MF. Physical activity and the mediating effect of fear, depression, anxiety, and catastrophizing on pain related disability in people with chronic low back pain. PLoS One. 2017 Jul 7;12(7):e0180788. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0180788. eCollection 2017.
PMID: 28686644BACKGROUNDMaher C, Underwood M, Buchbinder R. Non-specific low back pain. Lancet. 2017 Feb 18;389(10070):736-747. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30970-9. Epub 2016 Oct 11.
PMID: 27745712BACKGROUNDLe Huec JC, Thompson W, Mohsinaly Y, Barrey C, Faundez A. Sagittal balance of the spine. Eur Spine J. 2019 Sep;28(9):1889-1905. doi: 10.1007/s00586-019-06083-1. Epub 2019 Jul 22.
PMID: 31332569BACKGROUNDKoren Y, Kalichman L. Deep tissue massage: What are we talking about? J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2018 Apr;22(2):247-251. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2017.05.006. Epub 2017 May 17.
PMID: 29861215BACKGROUNDCai XY, Sun MS, Huang YP, Liu ZX, Liu CJ, Du CF, Yang Q. Biomechanical Effect of L4 -L5 Intervertebral Disc Degeneration on the Lower Lumbar Spine: A Finite Element Study. Orthop Surg. 2020 Jun;12(3):917-930. doi: 10.1111/os.12703. Epub 2020 May 31.
PMID: 32476282BACKGROUNDBogduk N. On the definitions and physiology of back pain, referred pain, and radicular pain. Pain. 2009 Dec 15;147(1-3):17-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2009.08.020. Epub 2009 Sep 16. No abstract available.
PMID: 19762151BACKGROUNDHansen AE, Marcus NJ. Is It Time to Consider Soft Tissue as a Pain Generator in Nonspecific Low Back Pain? Pain Med. 2016 Nov;17(11):1969-1970. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnw204. Epub 2016 Aug 27. No abstract available.
PMID: 27570247BACKGROUNDZheng Z, Wang J, Gao Q, Hou J, Ma L, Jiang C, Chen G. Therapeutic evaluation of lumbar tender point deep massage for chronic non-specific low back pain. J Tradit Chin Med. 2012 Dec;32(4):534-7. doi: 10.1016/s0254-6272(13)60066-7.
PMID: 23427384RESULTMajchrzycki M, Kocur P, Kotwicki T. Deep tissue massage and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for low back pain: a prospective randomized trial. ScientificWorldJournal. 2014 Feb 23;2014:287597. doi: 10.1155/2014/287597. eCollection 2014.
PMID: 24707200RESULTvan den Dolder PA, Roberts DL. A trial into the effectiveness of soft tissue massage in the treatment of shoulder pain. Aust J Physiother. 2003;49(3):183-8. doi: 10.1016/s0004-9514(14)60238-5.
PMID: 12952518RESULTvan den Dolder PA, Ferreira PH, Refshauge KM. Effectiveness of Soft Tissue Massage for Nonspecific Shoulder Pain: Randomized Controlled Trial. Phys Ther. 2015 Nov;95(11):1467-77. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20140350. Epub 2015 May 28.
PMID: 26023217RESULTFurlan AD, Giraldo M, Baskwill A, Irvin E, Imamura M. Massage for low-back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Sep 1;2015(9):CD001929. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001929.pub3.
PMID: 26329399RESULTSeffrin CB, Cattano NM, Reed MA, Gardiner-Shires AM. Instrument-Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization: A Systematic Review and Effect-Size Analysis. J Athl Train. 2019 Jul;54(7):808-821. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-481-17. Epub 2019 Jul 19.
PMID: 31322903RESULTBest TM, Hunter R, Wilcox A, Haq F. Effectiveness of sports massage for recovery of skeletal muscle from strenuous exercise. Clin J Sport Med. 2008 Sep;18(5):446-60. doi: 10.1097/JSM.0b013e31818837a1.
PMID: 18806553RESULTBervoets DC, Luijsterburg PA, Alessie JJ, Buijs MJ, Verhagen AP. Massage therapy has short-term benefits for people with common musculoskeletal disorders compared to no treatment: a systematic review. J Physiother. 2015 Jul;61(3):106-16. doi: 10.1016/j.jphys.2015.05.018. Epub 2015 Jun 17.
PMID: 26093806RESULTKassolik K, Andrzejewski W, Brzozowski M, Wilk I, Gorecka-Midura L, Ostrowska B, Krzyzanowski D, Kurpas D. Comparison of massage based on the tensegrity principle and classic massage in treating chronic shoulder pain. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2013 Sep;36(7):418-27. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2013.06.004. Epub 2013 Jul 25.
PMID: 23891481RESULTRomanowski MW, Spiritovic M, Rutkowski R, Dudek A, Samborski W, Straburzynska-Lupa A. Comparison of Deep Tissue Massage and Therapeutic Massage for Lower Back Pain, Disease Activity, and Functional Capacity of Ankylosing Spondylitis Patients: A Randomized Clinical Pilot Study. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2017;2017:9894128. doi: 10.1155/2017/9894128. Epub 2017 Aug 6.
PMID: 28845185RESULTWendt M, Rubach J, Waszak M. Short-term effect after soft tissue manipulation session on subjective and objective parameters in office workers with chronic low back pain: A randomized clinical trial. PLoS One. 2025 Nov 21;20(11):e0336685. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0336685. eCollection 2025.
PMID: 41270086DERIVED
Related Links
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Michał Wendt, PhD
Poznan University of Physical Education, Department of Biology and Anatomy
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Triple (participant, researcher, outcome assessor). Participants did not know which study group they belonged to. Each participant drew a number that was characteristic of a given research group (experimental DTM group or control group). The researcher also did not know which group the participant belonged to (he only used the participant number). Outcome assessor did not know which group was experimental and which was control (they were marked with numbers instead of names). The coordinator supervised the proper course of the study.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 1, 2023
First Posted
January 19, 2023
Study Start
September 1, 2021
Primary Completion
October 20, 2021
Study Completion
October 20, 2021
Last Updated
August 9, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR, ANALYTIC CODE
- Time Frame
- Data will be available from May/June 2023.
- Access Criteria
- Available to all researchers.
University IPD sharing platform is under preparation. All data will also be available to researchers via the principal researcher's email (wendt@awf.poznan.pl) or Research Gate website.