The Clinical Effect of Palliative Treatment on Patients With Terminal Cancer
The Clinical Effect Evaluation of Multidisciplinary Collaborative Team Combined With Palliative Care Model in Patients With Terminal Cancer: A Randomised Controlled Study
1 other identifier
interventional
84
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study proposed a multidisciplinary collaborative team combined with a palliative care model and proposed to establish a team composed of medical staff in various disciplines to make up for the defects of a conventional nursing team. This study applied the multidisciplinary collaboration team combined with a palliative care model to patients with terminal cancer to evaluate its clinical effect.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2019
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 6, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 10, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 16, 2022
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 25, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 13, 2023
CompletedJanuary 13, 2023
January 1, 2023
2.9 years
December 25, 2022
January 11, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (8)
Self-rating Anxiety Scale
This involved 20 items, of which the 5th, 9th, 13th, 17th and 19th items were reverse scoring, and the 1-5 items were positive scoring. The items were scored according to Likert4 grade. The sum of the scores of each item is the total score of the scale. The scores were converted to a standard score: standard score = total anxiety score×1.25. The higher the score, the more severe the anxiety state. A score \<50 showed no anxiety, 50-59 showed mild anxiety, 60-69 showed moderate anxiety, and \>70 showed severe anxiety
Within 8 hours after hospitalization
Self-rating Anxiety Scale
This involved 20 items, of which the 5th, 9th, 13th, 17th and 19th items were reverse scoring, and the 1-5 items were positive scoring. The items were scored according to Likert4 grade. The sum of the scores of each item is the total score of the scale. The scores were converted to a standard score: standard score = total anxiety score×1.25. The higher the score, the more severe the anxiety state. A score \<50 showed no anxiety, 50-59 showed mild anxiety, 60-69 showed moderate anxiety, and \>70 showed severe anxiety
through study completion, an average of 1 year
Self-rating Depression Scale
There are a total of 20 entries, of which 10 are scored by forward and 10 by reverse. The entries are scored by Likert4 level. The sum of the scores of each item is the total score of the scale. The scores were converted to a standard score: standard score = total anxiety score×1.25. The higher the score, the more serious the depression. A score ≤50 showed no depression, 50-59 showed mild depression, 60-69 showed moderate depression, and \>70 showed severe depression
Within 8 hours after hospitalization
Self-rating Depression Scale
There are a total of 20 entries, of which 10 are scored by forward and 10 by reverse. The entries are scored by Likert4 level. The sum of the scores of each item is the total score of the scale. The scores were converted to a standard score: standard score = total anxiety score×1.25. The higher the score, the more serious the depression. A score ≤50 showed no depression, 50-59 showed mild depression, 60-69 showed moderate depression, and \>70 showed severe depression
through study completion, an average of 1 year
Social Support Rating Scale
The scale was with a total of 10 items, including three dimensions of subjective support, objective support and utilisation of support. The total score of the scale is the sum of the scores of the three dimensions, and the higher the score, the greater the social support. Judgement criteria: A total score of ≤22 indicates a low level, 23-44 indicates a moderate level, and 45-66 indicates a high level, with a domestic norm score of 34.56±3.73
Within 8 hours after hospitalization
Social Support Rating Scale
The scale was with a total of 10 items, including three dimensions of subjective support, objective support and utilisation of support. The total score of the scale is the sum of the scores of the three dimensions, and the higher the score, the greater the social support. Judgement criteria: A total score of ≤22 indicates a low level, 23-44 indicates a moderate level, and 45-66 indicates a high level, with a domestic norm score of 34.56±3.73
through study completion, an average of 1 year
Quality of Life Scale
QLQ-C30 consists of one overall QOL scale and five functional scales. The functional scales include physical function, role function, emotional function, cognitive function and social function. Rating criteria: After the scores of each part of the scale are converted to standardised scores, and the score range is 0-100. The higher the score on the scale, the better the overall QOL and functional status
Within 8 hours after hospitalization
Quality of Life Scale
QLQ-C30 consists of one overall QOL scale and five functional scales. The functional scales include physical function, role function, emotional function, cognitive function and social function. Rating criteria: After the scores of each part of the scale are converted to standardised scores, and the score range is 0-100. The higher the score on the scale, the better the overall QOL and functional status
through study completion, an average of 1 year
Study Arms (2)
intervention group
EXPERIMENTALThe patients in the intervention group received multidisciplinary collaborative team care combined with palliative care.
control group
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe control group was given routine nursing intervention.
Interventions
Doctors carried out health education for patients to avoid patients giving up their lives, encouraged them to actively cooperate with medical staff, and instructed patients on how to face the disease with a brave and strong attitude and actively fight the disease. Nurses conducted daily psychological counselling for patients, learnt their inner thoughts through communication with patients, and provided timely comfort and encouragement. An attention-shifting method can be used to alleviate the patient's attention to the disease, effectively improving internal depression and avoiding depression. For patients with anxiety and loneliness, family members were instructed to accompany and care.
Reasonable control of indoor temperature and humidity is necessary to ensure that warm, light conditions permit properly dressed patients to feel warm. Nurses need to ensure that patients are kept clean and tidy in personal hygiene. They would regularly assist patients in turning over while giving patients sufficient respect.
Clinicians should regularly evaluate the patient's physical pain and give reasonable analgesic drugs to patients. Nurses should closely observe the medication response of patients. At the same time, it is necessary to observe and record patients' physical pain daily and take effective pain control measures.
The clinical nutritionist formulated appropriate nutritional diets according to the nutritional status and personal preferences of patients, provided nutritional support for patients, and followed up with patients once a week after discharge to improve their nutritional status.
Two nurses with psychological counselling qualifications in the team used the anxiety and depression scale to evaluate the psychological and emotional status of patients and referred to "The Questionnaire Survey on Awareness of Palliative Care" by the Department of Elderly Section of the union medical college hospital. The content mainly included the patient's medical history and general situation, the needs and awareness of patients and their families for palliative care, the choice of patients and their families for the final treatment plan, and the needs of families for grief counselling. Timely professional counselling and intervention were undertaken to alleviate the patient's adverse emotions.
The control group was given routine nursing intervention, strictly in accordance with a routine treatment process, monitoring the vital signs of patients, giving basic nursing, health education, diet guidance and so on.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients were diagnosed as terminal by imaging, pathology and clinical manifestations
- the expected length of stay was more than seven days
- patients with clear consciousness, good communication and understanding ability
- voluntary participation in this study and signing of informed consent
- the estimated survival period is more than three months
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with cognitive impairment and mental illness
- those who were seriously ill and could not cooperate with the completion
- patients with severe communication disorders
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Shijiazhuang People's Hospital
Shijiazhuang, China
Related Publications (1)
Liu YJ, Wu LP, Wang H, Han Q, Wang SN, Zhang J. The clinical effect evaluation of multidisciplinary collaborative team combined with palliative care model in patients with terminal cancer: a randomised controlled study. BMC Palliat Care. 2023 Jun 13;22(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s12904-023-01192-7.
PMID: 37312118DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- head nurse
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 25, 2022
First Posted
January 13, 2023
Study Start
June 6, 2019
Primary Completion
May 10, 2022
Study Completion
May 16, 2022
Last Updated
January 13, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-01