Endo-perio Disease - Treatment Outcomes Using Conventional and Hydraulic Calcium Silicate Sealer With or Without LPRF
Endodontic-periodontal Disease - Comparison of Treatment Outcome Using Conventional and Hydraulic Calcium Silicate Sealer With or Without LPRF and Characterisation of Host-microbiome Interaction
1 other identifier
interventional
115
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The endodontic periodontal-disease is characterized by the involvement of the pulp and periodontal disease in the same tooth. The anatomic connections between the dental pulp and the periodontium provide a pathway for perio-endo communication via apical foramina, lateral canals, exposed dentinal tubules, and developmental grooves. These pathways provide an egress for pulpal disease to affect the periodontium and conversely, an ingress for periodontal disease to affect the pulp. Teeth with endo-perio disease, which are deemed salvageable might require root canal (endodontic) treatment, followed by staged periodontal treatment. Compared to conventional sealers used for endodontic treatment, the hydraulic calcium silicate based sealers (HCSB)s have excellent sealing ability, biocompatibility, regeneration ability, and antimicrobial characteristics. However little is known about its clinical benefits when used to treat endo-perio disease. The gold standard treatment for periodontitis affected teeth associated with intrabony lesions is guided tissue regeneration (GTR) which has significant improved clinical outcomes over open flap debridement (Cochrane systematic review 2005). However, the success the of this regenerative technique requires careful case and defect selection. We propose the use of an autologous bioactive scaffold, leukocyte platelet rich fibrin (L-PRF) to achieve regeneration of periodontal soft and hard tissues, resulting in faster healing, greater bone infill and improved predictability of clinical outcomes
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started May 2023
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 16, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 12, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2033
January 12, 2023
December 1, 2022
4 years
December 16, 2022
January 11, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Probing pocket depth change in mm
Probing pocket depth change in mm at 12months (T8); at 18months (T9)
at 12months (T8); at 18months (T9)
Clinical attachment level (CAL) change in mm
Clinical attachment level (CAL) change in mm at 12months (T8); at 18months (T9)
at 12months (T8); at 18months (T9)
Change in the size of the lesion/ intrabony defect using Cone Beam CT and PA radiographs.
Change in the size of the lesion/ intrabony defect using Cone Beam CT and PA at 12months (T8); at 18months (T9)
at 12months (T8); at 18months (T9)
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Changes in levels of inflammatory markers and growth factors in blood, saliva and GCF (T1, T2, T3, T5, T7, T8, T9)
baseline (T1), Endodontic treatment, within 4 weeks from baseline (T2), Review at 3months (T3), Review at 6 months (T5), Review at 9 months (T7), Review at 12months( T8), Review at 18months (T9)
Plaque, Salivary and root canal microbiome associated with presence and healing of intrabony defects (T1, T2, T3, T5, T7, T8, T9)
baseline (T1), Endodontic treatment, within 4 weeks from baseline (T2), Review at 3months (T3), Review at 6 months (T5), Review at 9 months (T7), Review at 12months( T8), Review at 18months (T9)
Expression of inflammatory mediators from granulation tissue derived from periodontal intrabony defects (T6)
Surgical periodontal treatment, within 6-8 months from endodontic treatment (T6)
Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs)
baseline (T1), Endodonic treatment, within 4 weeks from baseline (T2), Review at 3months (T3), Review at 6 months (T5), Review at 9 months (T7), Review at 12months( T8), Review at 18months (T9)
Study Arms (4)
RCT using hydraulic calcium silicate sealer and L-PRF + GTR
EXPERIMENTALEndodontic-periodontal disease patients undergoing root canal treatment using hydraulic calcium silicate sealer and L-PRF + GTR (bone substitute + collagen membrane)
RCT using conventional sealer and L-PRF + GTR
EXPERIMENTALEndodontic-periodontal disease patients undergoing root canal treatment using conventional sealer and L-PRF + GTR (bone substitute + collagen membrane)
RCT using hydraulic calcium silicate sealer and GTR
EXPERIMENTALEndodontic-periodontal disease patients undergoing root canal treatment using hydraulic calcium silicate sealer and GTR (bone substitute + collagen membrane)
RCT using conventional sealer and GTR (bone substitute + collagen membrane)
ACTIVE COMPARATOREndodontic-periodontal disease patients undergoing root canal treatment using conventional sealer and GTR (bone substitute + collagen membrane) This is our control group Both the endodontic and periodontal lesions are managed using gold standard of care biomaterials and techniques
Interventions
Endodontic treatment with hydraulic calcium silicate sealer, followed by periodontal surgery using GTR +/- LPRF
Endodontic treatment with conventional sealer followed by periodontal treatment with PRF + GTR
Endodontic treatment with hydraulic calcium silicate sealer, followed by periodontal surgery using GTR only
Endodontic treatment with conventional sealer followed by periodontal treatment with GTR only
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Diagnosis of Endodontic-periodontal disease without root damage in periodontitis patients, Grades I, II, III according to Herrera 2017 classification.
- Presence of ≥ 1 intrabony defect: interproximal probing pocket depth ≥ 5 mm and ≥ 3mm radiographic intrabony defect, adjacent to single rooted and multi-rooted teeth associated with endodontic-periodontal disease
- Age: 18-80
- Non-smokers (zero cigarettes within last 5 years)
You may not qualify if:
- Endodontic considerations: severely sclerosed canals, external cervical resorption and internal root resorption, perforations, root fracture or cracking, re- RCT, apical surgery and unrestorable teeth
- Teeth with defects not amenable to regeneration or molar teeth planned for root resection
- \- Periodontal treatment carried out previously to the study site within the last 12 months (excluding not-extensive subgingival debridement as judged by the examining clinician),
- presence of drug induced gingival overgrowth.
- Smoking (current or in past 5 years) including e-cigarettes/ vaping
- History of alcohol or drug abuse,
- Systemic antibiotic therapy during the 3 months preceding the baseline exam,
- History of conditions requiring prophylactic antibiotic coverage prior to invasive dental procedures,
- Anti-inflammatory or anticoagulant therapy during the month preceding the baseline exam,
- Medical history of diabetes or transmittable diseases,
- Chronic inflammatory conditions: chronic peptic ulcer, tuberculosis, rheumatoid arthritis, ulcerative colitis, crohn's disease, active hepatitis, inflammatory bowel diseases, irritable bowel syndrome, autoimmune diseases, liver diseases, renal diseases or cancer
- Medications which alter bone metabolism: hormone replacement therapy, immunosuppressive drugs, corticosteroids, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, tumour necrosis factor blockers, IV bisphosphonates, and/or antiresorptive drugs,
- Self-reported pregnancy or lactation
- Surgical procedures in the last 6months (any type of surgical procedures)
- Other severe acute or chronic medical or psychiatric condition or laboratory abnormality that according to the investigator may increase the risk associated with trial participation,
- +1 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Guy'S and St Thomas' Nhs Foundation Trust
London, United Kingdom
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Sadia Niazi
King's College London, London SE1 9RT
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Operators for endodontic - periodontal treatment will be different from the assessors for the initial assessments and subsequent review appointments. The Treatment will be masked for the patient and assessor. As the blood samples will be collected from the patients at T6 for biomarker analysis, therefore the patient can be masked about the treatment as these blood can be used for the LPRF treatment for those patient who are randomised in the LPRF group. The statistician will also be blinded to the allocations and will only conduct the analysis in a semi-blinded way (group 1 vs group 2 vs group 3 vs group 4) without knowing the corresponding groups until the analysis is complete.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 16, 2022
First Posted
January 12, 2023
Study Start
May 1, 2023
Primary Completion (Estimated)
May 1, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
May 1, 2033
Last Updated
January 12, 2023
Record last verified: 2022-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
The research data will only be accessed by PIs, or CIs involved in the research project. The PhD student and statistician will only have access to anonymised data