Effects of Painful Compared to Painless Manual Therapy on Pain Processing in University Students With Neck Pain
Conditioned Pain Modulation Effects of Manual Therapy in University Students With Recurrent or Chronic Neck Pain
1 other identifier
interventional
38
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effects of provoking pain with manual therapy on pain processing in university students with recurrent or chronic neck pain.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2023
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 27, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 11, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 11, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 14, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 21, 2023
CompletedJuly 3, 2023
June 1, 2023
1 month
December 27, 2022
June 29, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Change from Baseline in Tibialis Anterior Pressure Pain Threshold (PPT) to immediate post-intervention
PPTs will be assessed bilaterally (the mean between both sides will be used for analysis) over the tibialis anterior muscle (remote pain-free area) using a digital algometer (Wagner instruments, Greenwich, CT, USA). Participants will be instructed to say "stop" when the pressure sensation becomes painful. The average of two trials for each side will be performed for analysis. The algometer pressure for assessment will be gradually increased at a rate of 1kg/second. Data will be collected in kg/cm2.
At baseline and immediately after the intervention
Change from Baseline in extensor carpi ulnaris PPT to immediate post-intervention
PPTs will be assessed bilaterally (the mean between both sides will be used for analysis) over the extensor carpi ulnaris muscle (remote pain-free area) using a digital algometer (Model FPX, Wagner instruments, Greenwich, CT, USA). Participants will be instructed to say "stop" when the pressure sensation becomes painful. The average of two trials for each side will be performed for analysis. The algometer pressure for assessment will be gradually increased at a rate of 1kg/second. Data will be collected in kg/cm2.
At baseline and immediately after the intervention
Change from Baseline in upper trapezius PPT to immediate post-intervention
PPTs will be assessed bilaterally (the mean between both sides will be used for analysis) over the extensor upper trapezius muscle (symptomatic area) using a digital algometer (Model FPX, Wagner instruments, Greenwich, CT, USA). Participants will be instructed to say "stop" when the pressure sensation becomes painful. The average of two trials for each side will be performed for analysis. The algometer pressure for assessment will be gradually increased at a rate of 1kg/second. Data will be collected in kg/cm2.
At baseline and immediately after the intervention
Change from Baseline in spinous process of C7 PPT to immediate post-intervention
PPT will be assessed over the spinous process of C7 (cervical innervated-related area) using a digital algometer (Model FPX, Wagner instruments, Greenwich, CT, USA). Participants will be instructed to say "stop" when the pressure sensation becomes painful. The average of two trials will be performed for analysis. The algometer pressure for assessment will be gradually increased at a rate of 1kg/second. Data will be collected in kg/cm2.
At baseline and immediately after the intervention
Secondary Outcomes (15)
Change from Baseline in Pain Intensity by Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) to immediate post-intervention
At baseline and immediately after the intervention
Change from Baseline in Pain Intensity by NRS to 4 hours post-intervention
At baseline and 4 hours after the intervention
Change from Baseline in Pain Intensity by NRS to 1 day post-intervention
At baseline and 1 day after the intervention
Change from Baseline in Pain Intensity by NRS to 2 days post-intervention
At baseline and 2 days after the intervention
Change from Baseline in Pain Intensity by NRS to 3 days post-intervention
At baseline and 3 days after the intervention
- +10 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Painful Manual Therapy
EXPERIMENTALManual therapy treatment shall be carried out at a high intensity that causes pain to the patient. The aim is to provoke a medium intensity pain to the patient of 5/10 in the NRS. The physiotherapist will ask every 30 seconds the pain provoked by the treatment with the numeric rating scale (NRS) and the patient will give continuous feedback. Based on this, the physiotherapist will adapt the intensity of the treatment to provoke a medium intensity pain.
Painless Manual Therapy
ACTIVE COMPARATORManual therapy treatment shall be performed at a low intensity that does not cause pain to the patient. The aim is for the patient to report a pain intensity of 0/10 in NRS throughout treatment. The physiotherapist will ask every 30 seconds the pain provoked by the treatment with NRS and the patient will give continuous feedback. Based on this, the physiotherapist will adapt the intensity of the treatment to be performed below the pain threshold.
Interventions
* Postero-anterior mobilizations: the physiotherapist will place his thumbs on the posterior surface of the spinous process of the vertebra previously assessed as the most painful to mobilise. The oscillations will be performed at the frequency of 1 oscillation per second and will be performed 3 series of 3 minutes, with a 1 minute rest interval. * Pressure: The point of greatest pain shall be treated by maintained pressure in each of the following areas: right upper trapezius, left upper trapezius, right paravertebral musculature and left paravertebral musculature. Pressure shall be applied to each of the points for 1 minute. * Massage: Pressure is applied to the muscles by sliding along the muscle belly. This will be done slowly to control the pain that is being provoked. 3 minutes will be carried out on each upper trapezius, sliding from the acromion to the occipital and another 3 minutes on the paravertebral musculature on each side, sliding from T1 to the occipital.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- University students
- Chronic neck pain (persistent pain \> 3 months almost every day of the week) or recurrent neck pain (repeated episodes of neck pain starting \> 3 months ago with pain-free periods)
- Non-specific neck pain (pain in the neck region that is not attributable to a known specific such as herniated disc, myelopathy, fractures, spinal stenosis, neoplasm etc. nor is it associated with traumatic causes such as whiplash)
- Mean NRS score the last week \> 2/10 and presence of pain on the day of assesment and treatment
You may not qualify if:
- Signs of radiculopathy or neuropathic pain
- Neck surgeries
- Inflammatory rheumatic
- Neurological, cardiorespiratory, oncological or psychiatric disease
- Pregnancy
- Not being able to read Spanish in order to fill in the questionnaires
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Universidad Rey Juan Carlos
Alcorcón, Madrid, 28047, Spain
Related Publications (4)
Bialosky JE, Beneciuk JM, Bishop MD, Coronado RA, Penza CW, Simon CB, George SZ. Unraveling the Mechanisms of Manual Therapy: Modeling an Approach. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2018 Jan;48(1):8-18. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2018.7476. Epub 2017 Oct 15.
PMID: 29034802BACKGROUNDVigotsky AD, Bruhns RP. The Role of Descending Modulation in Manual Therapy and Its Analgesic Implications: A Narrative Review. Pain Res Treat. 2015;2015:292805. doi: 10.1155/2015/292805. Epub 2015 Dec 16.
PMID: 26788367BACKGROUNDMelzack R. Prolonged relief of pain by brief, intense transcutaneous somatic stimulation. Pain. 1975 Dec;1(4):357-373. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(75)90073-1.
PMID: 141644BACKGROUNDWAND-TETLEY JI. Historical methods of counter-irritation. Ann Phys Med. 1956 Jul;3(3):90-9. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/iii.3.90. No abstract available.
PMID: 13363246BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Josué Fernández Carnero, PhD
Universidad Rey Juan Carlos
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 27, 2022
First Posted
January 11, 2023
Study Start
January 11, 2023
Primary Completion
February 14, 2023
Study Completion
February 21, 2023
Last Updated
July 3, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share