NCT05680688

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effects of provoking pain with manual therapy on pain processing in university students with recurrent or chronic neck pain.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
38

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2023

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 27, 2022

Completed
15 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 11, 2023

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 11, 2023

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 14, 2023

Completed
7 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 21, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

July 3, 2023

Status Verified

June 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

1 month

First QC Date

December 27, 2022

Last Update Submit

June 29, 2023

Conditions

Keywords

Manual TherapyPhysiotherapyPhysical TherapyConditioned Pain ModulationNeck Pain

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

  • Change from Baseline in Tibialis Anterior Pressure Pain Threshold (PPT) to immediate post-intervention

    PPTs will be assessed bilaterally (the mean between both sides will be used for analysis) over the tibialis anterior muscle (remote pain-free area) using a digital algometer (Wagner instruments, Greenwich, CT, USA). Participants will be instructed to say "stop" when the pressure sensation becomes painful. The average of two trials for each side will be performed for analysis. The algometer pressure for assessment will be gradually increased at a rate of 1kg/second. Data will be collected in kg/cm2.

    At baseline and immediately after the intervention

  • Change from Baseline in extensor carpi ulnaris PPT to immediate post-intervention

    PPTs will be assessed bilaterally (the mean between both sides will be used for analysis) over the extensor carpi ulnaris muscle (remote pain-free area) using a digital algometer (Model FPX, Wagner instruments, Greenwich, CT, USA). Participants will be instructed to say "stop" when the pressure sensation becomes painful. The average of two trials for each side will be performed for analysis. The algometer pressure for assessment will be gradually increased at a rate of 1kg/second. Data will be collected in kg/cm2.

    At baseline and immediately after the intervention

  • Change from Baseline in upper trapezius PPT to immediate post-intervention

    PPTs will be assessed bilaterally (the mean between both sides will be used for analysis) over the extensor upper trapezius muscle (symptomatic area) using a digital algometer (Model FPX, Wagner instruments, Greenwich, CT, USA). Participants will be instructed to say "stop" when the pressure sensation becomes painful. The average of two trials for each side will be performed for analysis. The algometer pressure for assessment will be gradually increased at a rate of 1kg/second. Data will be collected in kg/cm2.

    At baseline and immediately after the intervention

  • Change from Baseline in spinous process of C7 PPT to immediate post-intervention

    PPT will be assessed over the spinous process of C7 (cervical innervated-related area) using a digital algometer (Model FPX, Wagner instruments, Greenwich, CT, USA). Participants will be instructed to say "stop" when the pressure sensation becomes painful. The average of two trials will be performed for analysis. The algometer pressure for assessment will be gradually increased at a rate of 1kg/second. Data will be collected in kg/cm2.

    At baseline and immediately after the intervention

Secondary Outcomes (15)

  • Change from Baseline in Pain Intensity by Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) to immediate post-intervention

    At baseline and immediately after the intervention

  • Change from Baseline in Pain Intensity by NRS to 4 hours post-intervention

    At baseline and 4 hours after the intervention

  • Change from Baseline in Pain Intensity by NRS to 1 day post-intervention

    At baseline and 1 day after the intervention

  • Change from Baseline in Pain Intensity by NRS to 2 days post-intervention

    At baseline and 2 days after the intervention

  • Change from Baseline in Pain Intensity by NRS to 3 days post-intervention

    At baseline and 3 days after the intervention

  • +10 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Painful Manual Therapy

EXPERIMENTAL

Manual therapy treatment shall be carried out at a high intensity that causes pain to the patient. The aim is to provoke a medium intensity pain to the patient of 5/10 in the NRS. The physiotherapist will ask every 30 seconds the pain provoked by the treatment with the numeric rating scale (NRS) and the patient will give continuous feedback. Based on this, the physiotherapist will adapt the intensity of the treatment to provoke a medium intensity pain.

Other: Manual Therapy

Painless Manual Therapy

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Manual therapy treatment shall be performed at a low intensity that does not cause pain to the patient. The aim is for the patient to report a pain intensity of 0/10 in NRS throughout treatment. The physiotherapist will ask every 30 seconds the pain provoked by the treatment with NRS and the patient will give continuous feedback. Based on this, the physiotherapist will adapt the intensity of the treatment to be performed below the pain threshold.

Other: Manual Therapy

Interventions

* Postero-anterior mobilizations: the physiotherapist will place his thumbs on the posterior surface of the spinous process of the vertebra previously assessed as the most painful to mobilise. The oscillations will be performed at the frequency of 1 oscillation per second and will be performed 3 series of 3 minutes, with a 1 minute rest interval. * Pressure: The point of greatest pain shall be treated by maintained pressure in each of the following areas: right upper trapezius, left upper trapezius, right paravertebral musculature and left paravertebral musculature. Pressure shall be applied to each of the points for 1 minute. * Massage: Pressure is applied to the muscles by sliding along the muscle belly. This will be done slowly to control the pain that is being provoked. 3 minutes will be carried out on each upper trapezius, sliding from the acromion to the occipital and another 3 minutes on the paravertebral musculature on each side, sliding from T1 to the occipital.

Painful Manual TherapyPainless Manual Therapy

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • University students
  • Chronic neck pain (persistent pain \> 3 months almost every day of the week) or recurrent neck pain (repeated episodes of neck pain starting \> 3 months ago with pain-free periods)
  • Non-specific neck pain (pain in the neck region that is not attributable to a known specific such as herniated disc, myelopathy, fractures, spinal stenosis, neoplasm etc. nor is it associated with traumatic causes such as whiplash)
  • Mean NRS score the last week \> 2/10 and presence of pain on the day of assesment and treatment

You may not qualify if:

  • Signs of radiculopathy or neuropathic pain
  • Neck surgeries
  • Inflammatory rheumatic
  • Neurological, cardiorespiratory, oncological or psychiatric disease
  • Pregnancy
  • Not being able to read Spanish in order to fill in the questionnaires

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Universidad Rey Juan Carlos

Alcorcón, Madrid, 28047, Spain

Location

Related Publications (4)

  • Bialosky JE, Beneciuk JM, Bishop MD, Coronado RA, Penza CW, Simon CB, George SZ. Unraveling the Mechanisms of Manual Therapy: Modeling an Approach. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2018 Jan;48(1):8-18. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2018.7476. Epub 2017 Oct 15.

    PMID: 29034802BACKGROUND
  • Vigotsky AD, Bruhns RP. The Role of Descending Modulation in Manual Therapy and Its Analgesic Implications: A Narrative Review. Pain Res Treat. 2015;2015:292805. doi: 10.1155/2015/292805. Epub 2015 Dec 16.

    PMID: 26788367BACKGROUND
  • Melzack R. Prolonged relief of pain by brief, intense transcutaneous somatic stimulation. Pain. 1975 Dec;1(4):357-373. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(75)90073-1.

    PMID: 141644BACKGROUND
  • WAND-TETLEY JI. Historical methods of counter-irritation. Ann Phys Med. 1956 Jul;3(3):90-9. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/iii.3.90. No abstract available.

    PMID: 13363246BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Neck Pain

Interventions

Musculoskeletal Manipulations

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

PainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Complementary TherapiesTherapeuticsPhysical Therapy ModalitiesRehabilitation

Study Officials

  • Josué Fernández Carnero, PhD

    Universidad Rey Juan Carlos

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 27, 2022

First Posted

January 11, 2023

Study Start

January 11, 2023

Primary Completion

February 14, 2023

Study Completion

February 21, 2023

Last Updated

July 3, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-06

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations