NCT05679531

Brief Summary

The study was conducted as an experimental study to determine the effect of menthol chewing gum application on postoperative nausea, vomiting and hospital stay in children with appendectomy. The population of the study consisted of children aged 7-18 who underwent appendectomy in Bursa Yüksek İhtisas Training and Research Hospital Pediatric Surgery clinic between April and June 2022. In the sample of the study, a total of 60 children (menthol gum group- intervention group=30, control=30) who had postoperative nausea-vomiting, accepted to participate in the study and met the sample selection criteria were included. Starting from the second hour after the child was brought to the clinic after appendectomy, the children in the chewing gum group with nausea and vomiting were chewed gum for an average of 15 minutes. The patients in the study group were not intervened except for routine nursing care. During the chewing gum (between 5-10. minutes), up to 30., 60. and 120. Minutes after the chewing gum.The patient was re-evaluated in terms of nausea with the BARF nausea scale. Episodes of vomiting were recorded in patients with vomiting. After the quantitative stages of the study were completed, the patient's level of relief was evaluated using a verbal descriptive scale. Nausea and vomiting were also evaluated before the patient was discharged.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
60

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2022

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 1, 2022

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 1, 2022

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 1, 2022

Completed
6 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 8, 2022

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 11, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

January 12, 2023

Status Verified

January 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

2 months

First QC Date

December 8, 2022

Last Update Submit

January 10, 2023

Conditions

Keywords

childappendectomynausea and vomitingchewing gumlength of hospitalization

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (5)

  • Baxter Retching Faces Scale (BARF)

    The BARF scale was used to assess the severity of nausea. The primary outcome was nausea and vomiting as assessed by the BARF scale, which is used to measure the severity of postoperative nausea in children. The BARF scale consists of six faces and there is a difference of 2 points between each face. The Baxter Retching Faces (BARF) scale is graded from 0 to 10 points. Evaluation: 1 minute before chewing gum.

    Pre-procedure (< 1 minute)

  • Baxter Retching Faces Scale (BARF)

    The BARF scale was used to assess the severity of nausea. The primary outcome was nausea and vomiting as assessed by the BARF scale, which is used to measure the severity of postoperative nausea in children. The BARF scale consists of six faces and there is a difference of 2 points between each face. The Baxter Retching Faces (BARF) scale is graded from 0 to 10 points. Evaluation: During chewing gum ( fifth minute)

    During the procedure fifth Minute

  • Baxter Retching Faces Scale (BARF)

    The BARF scale was used to assess the severity of nausea. The primary outcome was nausea and vomiting as assessed by the BARF scale, which is used to measure the severity of postoperative nausea in children. The BARF scale consists of six faces and there is a difference of 2 points between each face. The Baxter Retching Faces (BARF) scale is graded from 0 to 10 points. Evaluation: 30 minutes after menthol chewing gum

    after menthol chewing gum 30 minutes

  • Baxter Retching Faces Scale (BARF)

    The BARF scale was used to assess the severity of nausea. The primary outcome was nausea and vomiting as assessed by the BARF scale, which is used to measure the severity of postoperative nausea in children. The BARF scale consists of six faces and there is a difference of 2 points between each face. The Baxter Retching Faces (BARF) scale is graded from 0 to 10 points. Evaluation: 60 minutes after menthol chewing gum

    after menthol chewing gum 60 minutes)

  • Baxter Retching Faces Scale (BARF)

    The BARF scale was used to assess the severity of nausea. The primary outcome was nausea and vomiting as assessed by the BARF scale, which is used to measure the severity of postoperative nausea in children. The BARF scale consists of six faces and there is a difference of 2 points between each face. The Baxter Retching Faces (BARF) scale is graded from 0 to 10 points. Evaluation: 120 minutes after menthol chewing gum

    after menthol chewing gum (120 minutes)

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • length of hospitalization

    Up to 2 week

Study Arms (2)

Control group

NO INTERVENTION

Children in the control group, who met the research criteria, were not applied any procedure other than clinical routine protocol and nursing care. After being brought to the pediatric surgery service, patients with nausea and vomiting were filled out with a questionnaire. The severity of nausea was evaluated with the BARF Scale during nausea and vomiting and 30, 60 and 120 minutes after nausea and vomiting in patients with nausea and vomiting.

Chewing gum group

EXPERIMENTAL

Starting from the second hour after the child was brought to the clinic after appendectomy, menthol sugar free gum was given to children with nausea and vomiting outside the clinical routine nursing care, as soon as they could chew gum and follow the instructions, and were asked to chew for an average of 15 minutes. The product of a single brand of gum was used. In the first stage, the patient's nausea was evaluated with the BARF nausea scale before the intervention. After filling out the patient information form, the patients who met the research criteria were chewed gum for an average of 15 minutes. During the intervention (between 5-10 minutes), the patient was re-evaluated for nausea with the BARF nausea scale at 30.,60. and 120 minutes after the intervention. Episodes of vomiting were recorded in patients with vomiting.After the quantitative stages of the study were completed, the patient's level of relief was evaluated using a verbal descriptive scale.

Other: intervention

Interventions

After filling out the patient information form, the patients who met the research criteria were chewed gum for an average of 15 minutes.

Chewing gum group

Eligibility Criteria

Age7 Years - 18 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Child and parent's willingness to participate in the research
  • The child has no intellectual disability or perception problems.
  • Patients who underwent general anesthesia
  • Patients who do not develop postoperative complications
  • Patients in the 7-18 age group
  • Patients who can tolerate chewing gum in the postoperative period
  • Patients who like to chew gum
  • Patients with nausea and vomiting

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients with a diagnosis of diabetes
  • Patients with teeth and jaw problems
  • Patients with menthol allergy
  • Patients with irritable bowel syndrome
  • Patients with a history of reflux
  • Patients whose cognitive level is not suitable
  • Patients with a nasogastric tube

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Bursa Uludag University

Bursa, 16330, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Postoperative Nausea and VomitingNauseaVomiting

Interventions

Methods

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Postoperative ComplicationsPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsSigns and Symptoms, DigestiveSigns and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Investigative Techniques

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Nurse

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 8, 2022

First Posted

January 11, 2023

Study Start

April 1, 2022

Primary Completion

June 1, 2022

Study Completion

June 1, 2022

Last Updated

January 12, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-01

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations