Transabdominal Plane (TAP) Blocks for Inguinal Hernia Repairs
1 other identifier
interventional
100
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of this double-blind clinical trial is to examine outcomes and pain control after surgery in patients who underwent laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (IHR) with the use of perioperative transabdominal plane (TAP) block. Research Question: Does transabdominal plane block improve pain when undergoing inguinal hernia repair? The endpoints include whether preoperative TAP blocks improve pain score (primary end point) and decrease opioid use (secondary endpoint) after an inguinal hernia repair. Other end points- complications after surgery.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_2
Started Dec 2019
Typical duration for phase_2
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 9, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 3, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 5, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 3, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 3, 2023
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
March 28, 2025
CompletedMarch 28, 2025
March 1, 2025
3.7 years
January 3, 2023
January 10, 2025
March 14, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Pain Score at Rest
On the pain score instrument, patients will score their pain score at rest. The full scale is scored between 1-10, with higher score indicating more pain.
on post-op days 1, 2, 3, and 4
Pain Score at Rest
On the pain score instrument, patients will score their pain score at rest. The full scale is scored between 1-10, with higher score indicating more pain.
All post-op (average 4 days)
Pain Score at Movement
On the pain score instrument, patients will score their pain score at movement. The full scale is scored between 1-10, with higher score indicating more pain.
on post-op days 1, 2, 3, and 4
Pain Score at Movement
On the pain score instrument, patients will score their pain score at movement. The full scale is scored between 1-10, with higher score indicating more pain.
All post-op (average 4 days)
Secondary Outcomes (10)
Number of Opioid Pills
on post-op days 1, 2, 3, and 4
Number of Opioid Pills
All post-op (average 4 days)
Number of Non-opioid Pain Medication
on post-op days 1, 2, 3, and 4
Number of Non-opioid Pain Medication
All post-op (average 4 days)
Number of Intraoperative Complications
up to 2 weeks post-surgery
- +5 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORNormal Saline: For patients weighing \<100 kg, a total of 50 ml ((25 ml on each side of the abdominal wall) will be received. If patients weigh\>100 kg, a total of 60 ml (30ml on each side of the abdominal wall) will be received.
Experimental
EXPERIMENTAL0.25% bupivacaine: For patients weighing \<100 kg, a total of 50 ml ((25 ml on each side of the abdominal wall) will be received. If patients weigh\>100 kg, a total of 60 ml (30ml on each side of the abdominal wall) will be received.
Interventions
The intervention is a transabdominal plane (TAP) block given in the abdomen to block pain receptors on nerves -during surgery can presumably decrease postoperative pain. Currently, TAP blocks are approved for use and performed based on surgeon preference (e.g. some surgeons perform them on every case, others variably, etc.).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- \- Patients undergoing laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair at the Mount Sinai Hospital
You may not qualify if:
- patients who are younger than 18 years old,
- have a history of chronic opiate usage, liver or kidney disease, pain syndromes,
- allergy to bupivacaine,
- are pregnant or
- are unable to independently give consent
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Mount Sinai Hospital
New York, New York, 10029, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Demographic information, like race and ethnicity was not obtained.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Celia Divino
- Organization
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Celia M Divino, MD
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- The Edelman Professor of Surgery
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 3, 2023
First Posted
January 5, 2023
Study Start
December 9, 2019
Primary Completion
August 3, 2023
Study Completion
August 3, 2023
Last Updated
March 28, 2025
Results First Posted
March 28, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Individual participant data will not be shared. Data will be published in aggregate form without any PHI or references to the patient so as to keep identifying information secure.