NCT05671224

Brief Summary

This study aims to develop a visual aid tool for induction education informed by the experiences and needs of historically marginalized pregnant women, as well as determine the impact of the patient-informed visual aid on patient knowledge, satisfaction, and trust in physicians regarding induction methods.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
84

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2023

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 1, 2023

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 4, 2023

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 20, 2023

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 30, 2023

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 1, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

September 20, 2024

Status Verified

September 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

3 months

First QC Date

January 1, 2023

Last Update Submit

September 18, 2024

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Induction of labor knowledge

    Multiple choice questions

    10 minutes (during completion of survey)

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Patient satisfaction

    10 minutes (during completion of survey)

  • Patient trust in providers survey

    10 minutes (during completion of survey)

Study Arms (2)

Standard counseling

NO INTERVENTION

Standard induction of labor counseling

Visual aid counseling

EXPERIMENTAL

Counseling on induction of labor with either a video or a handout

Other: Visual aid

Interventions

Handout and video describing different types of induction of labor

Visual aid counseling

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 45 Years
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients scheduled for or admitted for induction of labor and who can speak, read, and write in the English language.

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients undergoing induction termination or with a history of prior cesarean section, major fetal anomaly, known chromosomal anomaly, or fetal growth restriction with doppler abnormalities. Patients whose induction has already commenced will also be excluded.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Washington University

St Louis, Missouri, 63110, United States

Location

Related Publications (11)

  • Grobman WA, Rice MM, Reddy UM, Tita ATN, Silver RM, Mallett G, Hill K, Thom EA, El-Sayed YY, Perez-Delboy A, Rouse DJ, Saade GR, Boggess KA, Chauhan SP, Iams JD, Chien EK, Casey BM, Gibbs RS, Srinivas SK, Swamy GK, Simhan HN, Macones GA; Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. Labor Induction versus Expectant Management in Low-Risk Nulliparous Women. N Engl J Med. 2018 Aug 9;379(6):513-523. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1800566.

    PMID: 30089070BACKGROUND
  • Beckmann M, Cooper C, Pocock D. INFORMed choices: facilitating shared decision-making in health care. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2015 Jun;55(3):294-7. doi: 10.1111/ajo.12343. Epub 2015 Jun 5.

    PMID: 26053591BACKGROUND
  • Berger B, Schwarz C, Heusser P. Watchful waiting or induction of labour--a matter of informed choice: identification, analysis and critical appraisal of decision aids and patient information regarding care options for women with uncomplicated singleton late and post term pregnancies: a review. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2015 May 7;15:143. doi: 10.1186/s12906-015-0663-y.

    PMID: 25947100BACKGROUND
  • Cahill AG, Tuuli MG, Stout MJ, Lopez JD, Macones GA. A prospective cohort study of fetal heart rate monitoring: deceleration area is predictive of fetal acidemia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 May;218(5):523.e1-523.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.01.026. Epub 2018 Feb 1.

    PMID: 29408586BACKGROUND
  • Irani RA, Foster S. Overview of the mechanisms of induction of labor. Semin Perinatol. 2015 Oct;39(6):426-9. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2015.07.001. Epub 2015 Sep 11.

    PMID: 26372360BACKGROUND
  • Hamm RF, Srinivas SK, Levine LD. Risk factors and racial disparities related to low maternal birth satisfaction with labor induction: a prospective, cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019 Dec 30;19(1):530. doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2658-z.

    PMID: 31888529BACKGROUND
  • Bailey JM, Crane P, Nugent CE. Childbirth education and birth plans. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2008 Sep;35(3):497-509, ix. doi: 10.1016/j.ogc.2008.04.005.

    PMID: 18760232BACKGROUND
  • Sperlich M, Gabriel C, St Vil NM. Preference, knowledge and utilization of midwives, childbirth education classes and doulas among U.S. black and white women: implications for pregnancy and childbirth outcomes. Soc Work Health Care. 2019 Nov-Dec;58(10):988-1001. doi: 10.1080/00981389.2019.1686679. Epub 2019 Nov 4.

    PMID: 31682786BACKGROUND
  • Rosenthal L, Lobel M. Gendered racism and the sexual and reproductive health of Black and Latina Women. Ethn Health. 2020 Apr;25(3):367-392. doi: 10.1080/13557858.2018.1439896. Epub 2018 Feb 15.

    PMID: 29447448BACKGROUND
  • Rahman S, Kripalani S, Keegan E, Sparks A, Amdur R, Moawad G, Sheth S, Klebanoff J. An educational video's impact on the induction of labor experience: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2022 Jan;4(1):100495. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2021.100495. Epub 2021 Sep 24.

    PMID: 34571210BACKGROUND
  • Anderson LA, Dedrick RF. Development of the Trust in Physician scale: a measure to assess interpersonal trust in patient-physician relationships. Psychol Rep. 1990 Dec;67(3 Pt 2):1091-100. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1990.67.3f.1091.

    PMID: 2084735BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Audiovisual Aids

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Educational TechnologyTechnologyTechnology, Industry, and Agriculture

Study Officials

  • Nandini Raghuraman, MD, MS

    Washington University School of Medicine

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Model Details: Using a web-based randomization sequence on REDCap, patients will be randomized in 1:1 ratio to standard counseling or counseling with a visual aid immediately prior to initiation of their IOL.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 1, 2023

First Posted

January 4, 2023

Study Start

March 20, 2023

Primary Completion

June 30, 2023

Study Completion

August 1, 2023

Last Updated

September 20, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-09

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations