Blood Glucose Measurement in Terms Ofg Pain and Result Consistency
A Comparison of Two Regions Used in Capillary Blood Glucose Test in Terms of Pain and Result Consistency
1 other identifier
interventional
130
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Abstract Background: Capillary blood glucose measurement is one of the invasive procedures frequently used in clinics, hospitals and home. Aim: To determine the consistency of pain and results between the palm and fingertip in obtaining blood sample with the intention of monitoring capillary blood glucose. Design: This study is a crossover design designated. Settings: The research was carried out Diabetes Polyclinic Participants: One hundred thirty Type 2 diabetes patients who went to Diabetes Polyclinic Methods: The research was carried out with 130 Type 2 diabetes patients who went to Diabetes Polyclinic between August and November, 2018. During the data collection, the researcher took venous blood sample in a tube from each patient and according to the list of order determined via randomization scheme formed on the computer, the patients' glucose levels were measured by taking a capillary blood sample from the side of the middle fingertip and palm of the dominant hand with the glucometer. Before the study, the patient's pain assessment at the end of each measurement was carried out by a nurse who was trained by the researcher about the use of Visual Analog Scale. Keywords: capillary blood sampling; fingertip; glucose; pain; palm
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2018
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 30, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 30, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 4, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 30, 2022
CompletedDecember 30, 2022
December 1, 2022
4 months
December 4, 2022
December 19, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
venous blood samples
Venous blood samples of the patients were collected into a tube by the researcher.
through study completion, an average of 1 year
Capillary blood glucose measurement
For capillary blood glucose measurement, two regions, fingertip and palm were used in every patient. The patient washed his/her hands with warm water and soap and dried them with a paper towel. Prior to capillary blood collection, the patient washed his/her hands with warm water, kept his hand below the level of the heart, waved downwards and gently massaged his/her fingertips in order to obtain appropriate amount of blood. The dominant hands of the patients were used to collect capillary blood samples. In order not to affect the research results, the same glucometer device was used for all capillary glucose measurements and a new 28G sterile lancet was used in each application.
through study completion, an average of 1 year
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Visual Analog scale (VAS)
through study completion, an average of 1 year
Study Arms (1)
capillary blood glucose measurement
EXPERIMENTALthe researcher took venous blood sample in a tube from each patient and according to the list of order determined via randomization scheme formed on the computer, the patients' glucose levels were measured by taking a capillary blood sample from the side of the middle fingertip and palm of the dominant hand with the glucometer. Before the study, the patient's pain assessment at the end of each measurement was carried out by a nurse who was trained by the researcher about the use of Visual Analog Scale.
Interventions
The researcher took venous blood sample in a tube from each patient and according to the list of order determined via randomization scheme formed on the computer, the patients' glucose levels were measured by taking a capillary blood sample from the side of the middle fingertip and palm of the dominant hand with the glucometer. Before the study, the patient's pain assessment at the end of each measurement was carried out by a nurse who was trained by the researcher about the use of Visual Analog Scale.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Individuals with Type 2 diabetes
- who fasted at least 8-12 hours before blood sampling,
- who were 18 years and older,
- volunteered to participate in the study
You may not qualify if:
- with mental problems,
- communication problems,
- vision problems,
- upper extremity amputations,
- peripheral neuropathy or decreased sensation in their hands,
- the ones in whom blood samples cannot be obtained from the arm veins due to plaster etc.,
- those who could not make the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) correctly
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Melek Sahinlead
Study Sites (1)
Fethiye Goverment Hospital
Muğla, Fethiye, 48300, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (9)
Bijur PE, Silver W, Gallagher EJ. Reliability of the visual analog scale for measurement of acute pain. Acad Emerg Med. 2001 Dec;8(12):1153-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2001.tb01132.x.
PMID: 11733293BACKGROUNDChlebowy DO, Hood S, LaJoie AS. Facilitators and barriers to self-management of type 2 diabetes among urban African American adults: focus group findings. Diabetes Educ. 2010 Nov-Dec;36(6):897-905. doi: 10.1177/0145721710385579. Epub 2010 Oct 25.
PMID: 20974906BACKGROUNDAnitha Pavithran A, Ramamoorthy L, Bs S, Murugesan R, Mj K. Comparison of Fingertip vs Palm Site Sampling on Pain Perception, and Variation in Capillary Blood Glucose Level among Patients with Diabetes Mellitus. J Caring Sci. 2020 Dec 1;9(4):182-187. doi: 10.34172/jcs.2020.028. eCollection 2020 Dec.
PMID: 33409161RESULTAnzalone P. Equivalence of earlobe site blood glucose testing with finger stick. Clin Nurs Res. 2008 Nov;17(4):251-61. doi: 10.1177/1054773808325050.
PMID: 18927259RESULTBina DM, Anderson RL, Johnson ML, Bergenstal RM, Kendall DM. Clinical impact of prandial state, exercise, and site preparation on the equivalence of alternative-site blood glucose testing. Diabetes Care. 2003 Apr;26(4):981-5. doi: 10.2337/diacare.26.4.981.
PMID: 12663560RESULTChan HY, Lau TS, Ho SY, Leung DY, Lee DT. The accuracy and acceptability of performing capillary blood glucose measurements at the earlobe. J Adv Nurs. 2016 Aug;72(8):1766-73. doi: 10.1111/jan.12944. Epub 2016 Mar 1.
PMID: 27380764RESULTErgin E, Zaybak A. Effects of Different Methods Used to Take Blood Samples on Blood Glucose Measurements. Clin Nurs Res. 2022 Jan;31(1):29-38. doi: 10.1177/10547738211024782. Epub 2021 Jul 5.
PMID: 34218680RESULTFarmer L, Winfield C, Quatrara B, Letzkus L, Schenck P, Finneran P, Pollak D, McCaskill C, Nealy R, Conaway M. Does Site Matter? Comparing Accuracy and Patient Comfort of Blood Glucose Samples Taken From the Finger and Palm of the Perioperative Patient. J Perianesth Nurs. 2017 Dec;32(6):573-577. doi: 10.1016/j.jopan.2016.10.006. Epub 2017 Mar 22.
PMID: 29157763RESULTGuo J, Long Q, Li J, Wang X, Li Y, Jiang S, Sun M, Wiley J, Chen JL. Barriers and facilitators of self-monitoring of blood glucose engagement among women with gestational diabetes mellitus in China: A mixed-methods study. Midwifery. 2020 Nov;90:102797. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2020.102797. Epub 2020 Jul 18.
PMID: 32755742RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Eylem Ergün, RN
+905302373049
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SCREENING
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 4, 2022
First Posted
December 30, 2022
Study Start
August 1, 2018
Primary Completion
November 30, 2018
Study Completion
November 30, 2018
Last Updated
December 30, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-12