The Impact of a Virtual Magic Trick Training Program
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The proposed project will attempt to confirm the benefits of a structured magic trick training program (MTTP) experience in adolescents with autism. Benefits of participating in a 6-week virtual MTTP will be evaluated using validated assessments to measure social-emotional competencies.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_2
Started Mar 2023
Longer than P75 for phase_2
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 5, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 27, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 27, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2028
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2028
February 6, 2026
February 1, 2026
4.9 years
December 5, 2022
February 3, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (27)
Test of Adolescents Social Skills Knowledge (TASSK)
The TASSK is a self-report 30-item questionnaire that measures knowledge of specific social skills. Scores range between 0 to 26 with higher score reflecting greater knowledge of adolescent social skills.
baseline
Test of Adolescents Social Skills Knowledge (TASSK)
The TASSK is a self-report 30-item questionnaire that measures knowledge of specific social skills. Scores range between 0 to 26 with higher score reflecting greater knowledge of adolescent social skills.
at 6 week
Test of Adolescents Social Skills Knowledge (TASSK)
The TASSK is a self-report 30-item questionnaire that measures knowledge of specific social skills. Scores range between 0 to 26 with higher score reflecting greater knowledge of adolescent social skills.
at 12 week
Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ)
SDQ (peer problem scale and prosocial scale) consists of 10 items rated on a 3-point Likert-type scale (not true=1 to certainly true=3), with higher scores indicating higher psychological problems. Some items require reverse scoring.
baseline
Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ)
SDQ (peer problem scale and prosocial scale) consists of 10 items rated on a 3-point Likert-type scale (not true=1 to certainly true=3), with higher scores indicating higher psychological problems. Some items require reverse scoring.
at 6 week
Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ)
SDQ (peer problem scale and prosocial scale) consists of 10 items rated on a 3-point Likert-type scale (not true=1 to certainly true=3), with higher scores indicating higher psychological problems. Some items require reverse scoring.
at 12 week
Rosenberg Self Esteem Scale (RSES)
RSES consists of 10 items rated on a 4-point Likert-type scale, with higher scores indicate higher self-esteem.
baseline
Rosenberg Self Esteem Scale (RSES)
RSES consists of 10 items rated on a 4-point Likert-type scale, with higher scores indicate higher self-esteem.
at 6 week
Rosenberg Self Esteem Scale (RSES)
RSES consists of 10 items rated on a 4-point Likert-type scale, with higher scores indicate higher self-esteem.
at 12 week
UCLA Loneliness Scale Version 3
The UCLA Loneliness Scale (Version 3) is a 20-item measure that assesses how often a person feels disconnected from others. Using a 4-point rating scale (1= never; 4 = always), participants answer 20 questions, such as "How often do you feel left out?" and "How often do you feel part of a group of friends?" Researchers later reverse-code the positively worded items so that high values mean more loneliness, and then calculate a score for each respondent by averaging their ratings.
baseline
UCLA Loneliness Scale Version 3
The UCLA Loneliness Scale (Version 3) is a 20-item measure that assesses how often a person feels disconnected from others. Using a 4-point rating scale (1= never; 4 = always), participants answer 20 questions, such as "How often do you feel left out?" and "How often do you feel part of a group of friends?" Researchers later reverse-code the positively worded items so that high values mean more loneliness, and then calculate a score for each respondent by averaging their ratings.
at 6 week
UCLA Loneliness Scale Version 3
The UCLA Loneliness Scale (Version 3) is a 20-item measure that assesses how often a person feels disconnected from others. Using a 4-point rating scale (1= never; 4 = always), participants answer 20 questions, such as "How often do you feel left out?" and "How often do you feel part of a group of friends?" Researchers later reverse-code the positively worded items so that high values mean more loneliness, and then calculate a score for each respondent by averaging their ratings.
at 12 week
Self-efficacy Questionnaire for Children
It consists of 16 items rated on a 5-point Likert-type scale (not at all=1 to very well=5) with higher scores indicating higher self-efficacy.
baseline
Self-efficacy Questionnaire for Children
It consists of 16 items rated on a 5-point Likert-type scale (not at all=1 to very well=5) with higher scores indicating higher self-efficacy.
at 6 week
Self-efficacy Questionnaire for Children
It consists of 16 items rated on a 5-point Likert-type scale (not at all=1 to very well=5) with higher scores indicating higher self-efficacy.
at 12 week
Best Friend Index
The Best Friend Index is a scale for the measurement of the features of positive and negative friendship consisting of 18 items. Each item is answered on a 5-point scale (from 1= Never to 5=Very often).
baseline
Best Friend Index
The Best Friend Index is a scale for the measurement of the features of positive and negative friendship consisting of 18 items. Each item is answered on a 5-point scale (from 1= Never to 5=Very often).
at 6 week
Best Friend Index
The Best Friend Index is a scale for the measurement of the features of positive and negative friendship consisting of 18 items. Each item is answered on a 5-point scale (from 1= Never to 5=Very often).
at 12 week
Quality of Socialization Questionnaire
It is a 12-item self-report and parent-report measure to assess the frequency of adolescents get-together, number of friends involved and the level of conflict during get-togethers over the previous month.
baseline
Quality of Socialization Questionnaire
It is a 12-item self-report and parent-report measure to assess the frequency of adolescents get-together, number of friends involved and the level of conflict during get-togethers over the previous month.
at 6 week
Quality of Socialization Questionnaire
It is a 12-item self-report and parent-report measure to assess the frequency of adolescents get-together, number of friends involved and the level of conflict during get-togethers over the previous month.
at 12 week
Autism Social Skills Profile
It is a checklist that provides a comprehensive measure of social functioning of children and adolescents who are on the Autism Spectrum. The 49 items are rated on a 4-point Likert scale with 1=never, 2=sometimes, 3=often, and 4=very often. The test yields three subscale scores: Social/Emotional Reciprocity (SER), Social Participation/Avoidance (SPA), and Detrimental Social Behaviors (DSB), as well as a total score.
baseline
Autism Social Skills Profile
It is a checklist that provides a comprehensive measure of social functioning of children and adolescents who are on the Autism Spectrum. The 49 items are rated on a 4-point Likert scale with 1=never, 2=sometimes, 3=often, and 4=very often. The test yields three subscale scores: Social/Emotional Reciprocity (SER), Social Participation/Avoidance (SPA), and Detrimental Social Behaviors (DSB), as well as a total score.
at 6 week
Autism Social Skills Profile
It is a checklist that provides a comprehensive measure of social functioning of children and adolescents who are on the Autism Spectrum. The 49 items are rated on a 4-point Likert scale with 1=never, 2=sometimes, 3=often, and 4=very often. The test yields three subscale scores: Social/Emotional Reciprocity (SER), Social Participation/Avoidance (SPA), and Detrimental Social Behaviors (DSB), as well as a total score.
at 12 week
Stanford Social Dimensions Scale
The SSDS is more comprehensive, sensitive and specific compared to other instruments in terms of capturing key social processes that are necessary for understanding of social deficits in conditions. The 71 items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale with 1=never, 2=rarely, 3=sometimes, 4=often, and 5=always.
baseline
Stanford Social Dimensions Scale
IThe SSDS is more comprehensive, sensitive and specific compared to other instruments in terms of capturing key social processes that are necessary for understanding of social deficits in conditions. The 71 items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale with 1=never, 2=rarely, 3=sometimes, 4=often, and 5=always.
at 6 week
Stanford Social Dimensions Scale
The SSDS is more comprehensive, sensitive and specific compared to other instruments in terms of capturing key social processes that are necessary for understanding of social deficits in conditions. The 71 items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale with 1=never, 2=rarely, 3=sometimes, 4=often, and 5=always.
at 12 week
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Emotional stress
baseline
Emotional stress
at 6 week
Emotional stress
at 12 week
Study Arms (2)
magic trick training
EXPERIMENTALParticipation in a 6 weekly virtual magic trick training camp with three lessons per week.
waitlist control
NO INTERVENTIONParticipation in usual daily activities.
Interventions
A typical session will begin with the magician demonstrating a magic trick then revealing the secret move of the trick.The participants will learn and practice each trick. With assistance from the magician, participants will develop an oralstory presentation for the trick. After participants master one trick, the magician will demonstrate and teach the next.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Confirmed diagnosis (with proof of evidence) of autism;
- Aged between 11 and 18 years (younger children may lack the inductive reasoning skills to learn magic tricks);
- Have functional hand dexterity to do magic tricks
- Intact cognition as indicated by a score above the corresponding cut-off point of the child's age on the Mini-Mental Examination for Children; and
- Access to internet and a computer or smartphone that can perform videoconferencing.
You may not qualify if:
- Severe hearing or visual impairments that prevent online learning;
- Previous participation in organized magic learning program or camp;
- Current or planned participation in psychological therapy or a clinical trial during the study period that could affect the outcomes of the study.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Birmingham, Alabama, 35294, United States
Related Publications (1)
Spencer K, Yuen HK, Jenkins GR, Kirklin K, Vogtle LK, Davis D. The 'magic' of magic camp from the perspective of children with hemiparesis. J Exerc Rehabil. 2021 Feb 23;17(1):15-20. doi: 10.12965/jer.2040802.401. eCollection 2021 Feb.
PMID: 33728284BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Hon Yuen, PhD
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 5, 2022
First Posted
December 27, 2022
Study Start
March 27, 2023
Primary Completion (Estimated)
February 1, 2028
Study Completion (Estimated)
February 1, 2028
Last Updated
February 6, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share