Investigation of the Effect of Different Training Techniques in Teaching the Management of Shoulder Dystocia

NCT05660551 | Completed

• 1 other identifier: 737219
• Study Type: interventional
• Target: 132
• Locations: 1 country
• Sites: 1

Brief Summary

In this study, it was aimed to determine the effect of demonstration, telesimulation and game-based teaching on teaching shoulder dystocia management in midwifery students. H01: There is no difference between the four groups in terms of satisfaction with learning. H02: There is no difference between the four groups in terms of Self-Confidence in Learning. H03: There is no difference between the four groups in terms of Motivation scores in Teaching Materials.

Conditions

Shoulder Dystocia

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

• Shoulder Dystocia Skill Checklist

  The skill checklist prepared by the researcher by scanning the literature consists of three parts (Taşkın, 2016; Sayıner \& Başkaya, 2020); diagnosing shoulder dystocia, making the necessary interventions for shoulder dystocia at birth, and intervention after birth.In the skill list, the student will receive 1 point for each correct application, and 0 points for each incorrect or skipped application.Higher scores indicate higher skill levels.

  15 days after the training

• Instructional Materials Motivation Survey

  The Instructional Materials Motivation Survey (IMMS) aims to assess the motivational characteristics of instructional materials or courses using the Attention, Relevance, Confidence, and Satisfaction (ARCS) model of motivation. The five-point Likert type scale consists of 36 items in the original scale. In the last Turkish adaptation study, 3 of the items were excluded from the original scale and a total of 33 items were included in the Turkish version of the scale.

  15 days after the training

• Change in Self-Sufficiency

  Visual Analog Scale (VAS)- assessed by adequate vision. For each item, students rated their sense of self-sufficiency on a scale of 0 (very inadequate) to 10 (very adequate).

  immediately before the training, immediately after the training

Study Arms (4)

Control Group

NO INTERVENTION

Demonstration group

EXPERIMENTAL

Other: Demostration

Telesimulation Group

EXPERIMENTAL

Other: Telesimulation

Kahoot Game Group

EXPERIMENTAL

Other: Kahoot Game

Interventions

Demostration OTHER

This group will be demonstrated on a model after the theoretical training. The maneuvers used in the management of shoulder dystocia will be shown to the students on the model, respectively.

Demonstration group

Telesimulation OTHER

After the theoretical training for this group, telesimulation will be applied. A scenario will be created for the telesimulation experience and a video will be shot with this scenario. These videos will be watched by the students in groups of 4 on Microsoft Teams and a case discussion will be made through this scenario.

Telesimulation Group

Kahoot Game OTHER

Kahoot, a game-based program, will be applied to this group one week after the theoretical training. The game will be organized according to the learning objectives and achievements related to shoulder dystocia.

Kahoot Game Group

Eligibility Criteria

• Age: 18 Years+
• Sex: all
• Healthy Volunteers: Yes
• Age Groups: Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

• Being a registered student in the midwifery department,
• Having the ability to manage normal birth,
• Having a smart phone, tablet or computer with internet connection,
• Agreeing to participate in the research

You may not qualify if:

• to suspend education.
• Having received formal training on shoulder dystocia management.

Sponsors & Collaborators

• Ankara University: lead

Study Sites (1)

Ankara University Faculty of Nursing

Ankara, 06620, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Shoulder Dystocia

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Dystocia; Obstetric Labor Complications; Pregnancy Complications; Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications; Urogenital Diseases

Study Design

• Study Type: interventional
• Phase: not applicable
• Allocation: RANDOMIZED
• Masking: SINGLE
• Who Masked: OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
• Purpose: SUPPORTIVE CARE
• Intervention Model: PARALLEL
• Sponsor Type: OTHER
• Responsible Party: PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
• PI Title: Associate Professor Dr.

Study Record Dates

• First Submitted: December 13, 2022
• First Posted: December 21, 2022
• Study Start: December 23, 2022
• Primary Completion: January 23, 2023
• Study Completion: January 30, 2023
• Last Updated: June 18, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-06

Locations

TU (1)