Immediate Implant vs.Socket Shield Technique in Esthetic Zone

NCT05658419 | Completed DMC

• 1 other identifier: 1103701#
• Study Type: interventional
• Target: 20
• Locations: 1 country
• Sites: 1

Brief Summary

immediate implant placement versus socket shield approach

Conditions

Bone Loss

Keywords

socket shield

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

• radiographic bone level

  vertical and horizontal bone loss

  6 months

Study Arms (2)

control group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

immediate implant placement

Procedure: socket sheild

study group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

socket shield immediate implant placement

Procedure: socket sheild

Interventions

socket sheild PROCEDURE

the socket shield technique, in which a partial root fragment was retained around an immediately placed implant with the aim of avoiding tissue alterations after tooth extraction. Histologic evaluation in a beagle dog showed no resorption of the root fragment and new cementum formed on the implant surface.

Also known as: partial extraction therapies

control group; study group

Eligibility Criteria

• Age: 20 Years - 45 Years
• Sex: all
• Healthy Volunteers: Yes
• Age Groups: Adult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

• Patients of 20-45 years of both sexes. Good oral hygiene Demonstrating non-restorable maxillary anterior single rooted teeth in the esthetic zone with as far diagnosable.
• Fairly intact buccal periodontal tissues. Patients' acceptance to sign the informed consent. Labial bone plates less than 1.5 mm in thickness or cases with labial root curvatures.
• Intact root with no mobility in the tooth and no sub-gingival caries.

You may not qualify if:

• Patients with systemic diseases that would interfere with the normal healing such as uncontrolled diabetes mellitus.
• History of radiation therapy to the head and neck. No history of bruxism/ para-functional habits. (119) Teeth with periodontal disease, vertical root fracture, horizontal fracture at or below the bone level, and teeth with local pathologic incidents that affect the labial part of the root as external or internal root resorption were also excluded.
• Maxillary 1st and 2nd premolars. Pregnant and lactating females.

Sponsors & Collaborators

• Alexandria University: lead

Study Sites (1)

Mohamed Mohamed Shehata Elsayed

Alexandria, 21516, Egypt

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Bone Diseases, Metabolic

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Bone Diseases; Musculoskeletal Diseases; Metabolic Diseases; Nutritional and Metabolic Diseases

Study Design

• Study Type: interventional
• Phase: not applicable
• Allocation: RANDOMIZED
• Masking: QUADRUPLE
• Who Masked: PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
• Masking Details: Operator Data collector Examiner
• Purpose: OTHER
• Intervention Model: PARALLEL
• Sponsor Type: OTHER
• Responsible Party: SPONSOR

Model Details: Study group (socket shield) vs. Control group (immediate implants)

Study Record Dates

• First Submitted: December 12, 2022
• First Posted: December 20, 2022
• Study Start: January 14, 2021
• Primary Completion: December 1, 2021
• Study Completion: August 5, 2022
• Last Updated: December 20, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-12

Locations

EG (1)