Enteroendocrine Hormonal Response After the Ingestion of Cola Beverages With Sucrose and Non-nutritive Sweeteners
Enteroendocrine, Pancreatic, and Adipocyte Hormonal Response After the Ingestion of Cola Beverages With Sucrose and Non-nutritive Sweeteners in Healthy Adults. Crossover Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
20
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Introduction: The consumption of non-nutritive sweeteners (NNS) has been increasing in recent years, as an alternative to replace sugars and reduce the additional intake of carbohydrates, with the idea of reducing the risk of developing obesity, metabolic syndrome, and diabetes. However, recent evidence shows that their chronic intake induces endocrine alterations that may have an important contribution to the increase in body weight. Few studies have explored the acute effects of NNS beverage consumption on endocrine response, and to date, the evidence has been inconsistent regarding post-drinking effects and potential health risks. Objective: To evaluate the effect of 3 different types of cola beverages, compared with carbonated water, on glucose, insulin, glucagon, and appetite-regulating hormones during the first 120 minutes after ingestion. Methods: A triple-blind, randomized crossover controlled trial was carried out in which 20 healthy adult individuals (10 men and 10 women) were included. With a washout period of one week (7 days) and fasting for 8 hours, each participant consumed orally 355 mL of carbonated water (CAR), and the 3 different cola beverages sweetened with sucrose (SUC), aspartame/acesulfame K (ASP), and sucrose/stevia (STE), in its commercial presentation. The serum levels of glucose, insulin, glucagon, GLP-1, GIP, PYY, leptin, pancreatic polypeptide, and ghrelin were determined during the administration of each one of the drinks before the intake of the drink and later at 30, 60, 90, and 120 minutes. Statistical analysis: A descriptive analysis of the variables was performed. The global response of glucose, insulin and appetite-regulating hormones was estimated and the Area Under the Curve (AUC) was obtained using a trapezoidal model and analyzed for each outcome by one-factor ANOVA. An ANOVA for repeated measures was performed considering treatment and time as factors, and comparisons were made with the carbonated water as a control using the Bonferroni test. P values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Ethical considerations: Our institution's Research, Bioethics, and Biosafety committees authorized the project. All the participants were informed about the objective, the procedures, and the possible adverse effects considered within the study, and they signed the informed consent before the start of the interventions.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable obesity
Started Feb 2016
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable obesity
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 8, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 27, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 27, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 25, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 16, 2022
CompletedDecember 16, 2022
December 1, 2022
4 months
November 25, 2022
December 8, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
Glucose, insulin, glucagon, glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1), peptide tyrosine tyrosine (PYY), glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP), pancreatic polypeptide (PP), leptin, and ghrelin
4-5mL of venous blood was obtained from each participant and immediately transferred to the laboratory for analysis. The glucose oxidase technique was implemented to determine serum glucose levels. This technique has high intra- and inter-assay precision (CV: 2.1 and 1.73%, respectively), and high correlation with Gernon's reagent (r=0.993). For the determination of insulin, glucagon, GLP-1, PYY, GIP, PP, leptin, and ghrelin levels, implemented the Milliplex Map® immunological assay, which has an intra-assay coefficient of variation of less than 10% and an inter-assay coefficient of less than 15%, with an accuracy greater than 97%. The tests were carried out in duplicate.
Measurements were made at 0 minute (before the intake of the drink)
Glucose, insulin, glucagon, glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1), peptide tyrosine tyrosine (PYY), glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP), pancreatic polypeptide (PP), leptin, and ghrelin
4-5mL of venous blood was obtained from each participant and immediately transferred to the laboratory for analysis. The glucose oxidase technique was implemented to determine serum glucose levels. This technique has high intra- and inter-assay precision (CV: 2.1 and 1.73%, respectively), and high correlation with Gernon's reagent (r=0.993). For the determination of insulin, glucagon, GLP-1, PYY, GIP, PP, leptin, and ghrelin levels, implemented the Milliplex Map® immunological assay, which has an intra-assay coefficient of variation of less than 10% and an inter-assay coefficient of less than 15%, with an accuracy greater than 97%. The tests were carried out in duplicate.
Measurements were made at 30 minutes after the intake of the drink
Glucose, insulin, glucagon, glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1), peptide tyrosine tyrosine (PYY), glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP), pancreatic polypeptide (PP), leptin, and ghrelin
4-5mL of venous blood was obtained from each participant and immediately transferred to the laboratory for analysis. The glucose oxidase technique was implemented to determine serum glucose levels. This technique has high intra- and inter-assay precision (CV: 2.1 and 1.73%, respectively), and high correlation with Gernon's reagent (r=0.993). For the determination of insulin, glucagon, GLP-1, PYY, GIP, PP, leptin, and ghrelin levels, implemented the Milliplex Map® immunological assay, which has an intra-assay coefficient of variation of less than 10% and an inter-assay coefficient of less than 15%, with an accuracy greater than 97%. The tests were carried out in duplicate.
Measurements were made at 60 minutes after the intake of the drink
Glucose, insulin, glucagon, glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1), peptide tyrosine tyrosine (PYY), glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP), pancreatic polypeptide (PP), leptin, and ghrelin
4-5mL of venous blood was obtained from each participant and immediately transferred to the laboratory for analysis. The glucose oxidase technique was implemented to determine serum glucose levels. This technique has high intra- and inter-assay precision (CV: 2.1 and 1.73%, respectively), and high correlation with Gernon's reagent (r=0.993). For the determination of insulin, glucagon, GLP-1, PYY, GIP, PP, leptin, and ghrelin levels, implemented the Milliplex Map® immunological assay, which has an intra-assay coefficient of variation of less than 10% and an inter-assay coefficient of less than 15%, with an accuracy greater than 97%. The tests were carried out in duplicate.
Measurements were made at 90 minutes after the intake of the drink
Glucose, insulin, glucagon, glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1), peptide tyrosine tyrosine (PYY), glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP), pancreatic polypeptide (PP), leptin, and ghrelin
4-5mL of venous blood was obtained from each participant and immediately transferred to the laboratory for analysis. The glucose oxidase technique was implemented to determine serum glucose levels. This technique has high intra- and inter-assay precision (CV: 2.1 and 1.73%, respectively), and high correlation with Gernon's reagent (r=0.993). For the determination of insulin, glucagon, GLP-1, PYY, GIP, PP, leptin, and ghrelin levels, implemented the Milliplex Map® immunological assay, which has an intra-assay coefficient of variation of less than 10% and an inter-assay coefficient of less than 15%, with an accuracy greater than 97%. The tests were carried out in duplicate.
Measurements were made at 120 minutes after the intake of the drink
Study Arms (4)
Carbonated water
PLACEBO COMPARATOR355ml of an orally ingested carbonated water
Cola beverage with aspartame and acesulfame K
EXPERIMENTAL355ml of an orally ingested carbonated cola drink, sweetened with 142mg of aspartame and acesulfame k, combined (soft drink in its commercial presentation)
Cola beverage with sucrose and stevia
EXPERIMENTAL355ml of an orally ingested carbonated cola drink, sweetened with 16g of sucrose and 15.62mg of stevia (soft drink in its commercial presentation)
Cola beverage with sucrose
ACTIVE COMPARATOR355ml of an orally ingested carbonated cola drink, sweetened with 37g of sucrose
Interventions
Before starting the study: Subjects were asked to avoid non-nutritive sweetener consumption for 48 hours prior to the study sessions. A standardized menu of 346 Kcal was prescribed for dinner and fasting for at least 8 hours prior to each study session. A 7-day washout period was left between each study session. Session 1: Weight, height, and waist circumference were measured, the BMI was calculated, and sociodemographic data of the participants and information on the habitual consumption of soft drinks were collected. In each session: The beverages were offered at approximately 4°C, in standardized disposable cups, and the participants were asked to drink them in a maximum time of 10 minutes. Heart rate, respiratory rate, and blood pressure were measured before the intervention and every 30 minutes during the observation period. The subjects who manifested adverse sensations were referred to receive medical attention and withdrawn from the session.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Voluntary participation expressed through the signing of informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Pregnancy (date of last menstruation \>28 days)
- History of diabetes mellitus or glucose intolerance, endocrinopathies, or pancreatic diseases
- Treatment with medications or supplements that modify glucose and insulin (eg antihypertensives, corticosteroids, hypoglycemic agents, hormonal agents, etc.)
- Gastrointestinal diseases or conditions that alter gastric emptying and intestinal transit
- Hypersensitivity to the compounds that will be used in the study
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
America L Miranda-Lora, PhD
Epidemiological research unit of Endocrinology and nutrition, HIMFG
- STUDY CHAIR
Miguel Klünder-Klünder, PhD
Deputy director of research management, HIMFG
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Cesar Galicia-Ayala, Master
Nursing research unit, HIMFG
- STUDY CHAIR
Armando Vilchis-Ordoñez, PhD
Clinical lab, HIMFG
- STUDY CHAIR
Briceida López-Martínez, PhD
Clinical lab, HIMFG
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Triple masking was applied, as described below. Participants: The drinks were offered in standardized disposable cups so that the participants could not visually identify the test drink. All beverages were offered at approximately 4°C and participants were asked to consume them within 10 minutes. Investigator: All participants received the mineral water (control) in the first study session. Allocation to the remaining 3 interventions was randomized for each participant, and members of the research team who administered the beverages, performed blood sampling, processed samples in the laboratory, or followed participants during the study sessions were unaware of the allocation, that is, the type of drink that was administered to each participant. Outcomes Assessor: The investigator who performed the statistical analysis did not have access to the identity of the participants or the allocation of interventions.
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 25, 2022
First Posted
December 16, 2022
Study Start
February 8, 2016
Primary Completion
May 27, 2016
Study Completion
May 27, 2016
Last Updated
December 16, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share