Denosumab vs Zoledronate After Lumbar Fusion
Denosumab vs Zoledronate Efficacy in Osteopenic Patients With Lumbar Degenerative Disease After Lumbar Fusion Surgery
1 other identifier
interventional
100
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of the study was to compare denosumab and zoledronate efficacy in bone mass, bone turnover markers (BTMs), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for leg and back, EuroQol Five-Dimension (EQ-5D) scores, Quality of Life Questionnaire of the European Foundation for Osteoporosis-31 (QUALEFFO-31) scores, and Roland-Morris Disability Functioning Questionnaire (RMDQ) scores, secondary fracture, complications and adverse events after lumbar fusion.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_3
Started Jan 2020
Typical duration for phase_3
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 15, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 25, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 6, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 26, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 28, 2023
CompletedFebruary 21, 2023
February 1, 2023
3.1 years
November 25, 2022
February 18, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (6)
Lumbar bone mineral density(BMD)
Lumbar vertebral (L1 to L4, except the surgery segment) BMD were determined at baseline, 6 and 12 months via dual energy X-ray
up to 12 months
Total hip BMD
Total hip BMD were determined at baseline, 6 and 12 months via dual-energy X-ray
up to 12 months
Femoral neck BMD
Femoral neck BMD were determined at baseline, 6 and 12 month via dual-energy X-ray
up to 12 months
Procollagen type 1 n-terminal propeptide (P1NP)
Bone formation marker, P1NP were determined at baseline, 6 and 12 months after surgery
up to 12 months
C-terminal cross-linked type 1 collagen terminal peptide (CTX)
Bone resorption marker, CTX were determined at baseline, 6 and 12 months after surgery
up to 12 months
Visual analog scale (VAS) back
The VAS score for back pain were determined at baseline, 6 and 12 month. Use a ruler about 10cm long, one side is marked with "0" and the other "10" respectively. A score of 0 indicates no pain, 10 indicates the most unbearable pain.
up to 12 months
Secondary Outcomes (6)
The Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire
up to 12 month
The QUALEFFO-31 Questionnaire
up to 12 month
The EQ-5D Questionnaire
up to 12 month
New fracture rate
up to 12 month
Complications
up to 12 month
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Denosumab
EXPERIMENTALdenosumab (60 mg subcutaneously, per 6 month)
zoledronate
ACTIVE COMPARATORzoledronate (5mg, intravenous infusion once a year)
Interventions
60 mg subcutaneously per 6 month
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Participants aged 40 to 85 years
- who diagnosed with lumbar spinal stenosis or lumbar spondylolisthesis
- osteopenia with BMD T score between -1 and -2.5 via dual energy X-ray
- low back pain or leg numbness or weakness
- MRI demonstrated signs of nerve compression
- patients with one or two level symptoms.
You may not qualify if:
- cauda equina syndrome
- progressive neurologic deficit
- history of cancer
- scoliosis greater than 15°
- back open surgery history
- have contraindications for surgery
- who had anti-osteoporosis medication within 6 weeks
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
ShenzhenPH
Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518000, China
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Songlin Peng, Doctor
Shenzhen People's Hospital
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 25, 2022
First Posted
December 6, 2022
Study Start
January 15, 2020
Primary Completion
February 26, 2023
Study Completion
February 28, 2023
Last Updated
February 21, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-02