Ureteral Access Sheath or Percutaneous Nephrostomy During Flexible Ureteroscopy: Which is Better?
1 other identifier
interventional
100
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
we aim to compare the safety and efficacy of flexible ureteroscopy with ureteral access sheath (group A) in comparison with flexible ureteroscopy without UAS but with PCN insertion (group B) either intra or post operaively by recording all data and the benefits , also comparing the drawbacks on each group
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Dec 2022
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 21, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 1, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2023
CompletedDecember 2, 2022
November 1, 2022
6 months
November 21, 2022
November 30, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
intra-operative complications
Operative time, intra-operative complications (bleeding, perforation, incompletion of procedure) and hospitalization periods
3 mothes
Study Arms (2)
operated using UAS during flexible ureteroscopy
ACTIVE COMPARATORoperated using PCN during flexible ureteroscopy
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
under general anesthesia and given appropriate antibiotic cover. a clssic flexible ureteroscopy procedure is done and appropriately sized UAS was then inserted over the wire and positioned just distal to the PUJ or below upper ureteric stone under fluoroscopic guidance. We then perform a flexible ureteroscopy using Olympus URF-V2 (8.5 Fr) flexible ureteroscope to inspect the proximal ureter if there is upper ureteric stone, renal pelvis, and calyces for the presence of stones. Irrigation with 0.9% saline solution via a pressure-infusing system. Next, Holmium laser lithotripsy with a holmium:YAG laser \[20 W; Lumenis (UK) Ltd., Elstree, UK\] using a 272 micron laser fiber (Lumenis, Inc.) is carried out and/or stone extraction with a basket device, in the other group we add inserted trans papillary in the lower calyx of the kidney by an expert intervention radiologist
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- patients with upper ureteric stones and mild hydronephrosis or renal pelvic stones less than 20 mm with mild hydronephrosis
You may not qualify if:
- patients with active urinary tract infection and patients with uncontrolled coagulable status
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Benha Universitylead
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- assistant professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 21, 2022
First Posted
December 1, 2022
Study Start
December 1, 2022
Primary Completion
June 1, 2023
Study Completion
July 1, 2023
Last Updated
December 2, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-11