Restorelle® Y Mesh vs. Vertessa® Lite Y Mesh for Laparoscopic and Robotic-assisted Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy
Lite-Y
A Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing Restorelle® Y Mesh vs. Vertessa® Lite Y Mesh for Laparoscopic and Robotic-assisted Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy
1 other identifier
interventional
106
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This is a randomized clinical trial to compare outcomes between the Restorelle® Y mesh and Vertessa® lite Y mesh for the treatment of vaginal vault prolapse. Hypothesis: Vertessa® lite Y mesh is not inferior to Restorelle® Y mesh for the treatment of vaginal vault prolapse
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2018
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 18, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 20, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 24, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 19, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 19, 2023
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
January 30, 2026
CompletedJanuary 30, 2026
January 1, 2026
5.3 years
September 20, 2018
January 5, 2026
January 29, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Number of Participants With Pelvic Organ Prolapse Recurrence
Retreatment for prolapse by either surgery or pessary
24 months
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Number of Participants With Postoperative Complications
6 months
Number of Participants With Mesh Exposure
24 months
Number of Participants With Stress Incontinence Retreatment
24 months
Mean Difference Between Baseline (Pre-procedure) and 24-months Post-procedure
Baseline (pre-procedure) to 24-months (post-procedure)
Mean Difference Between Baseline (Pre-procedure) and 24-months Post-procedure
Baseline (pre-procedure) to 24-months (post-procedure)
Study Arms (2)
Restorelle® Y mesh
ACTIVE COMPARATORAll subjects will be predetermined by their surgeon to undergo either a laparoscopic or robotic assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy depending upon their clinical evaluation. The participants will then be randomized to Restorelle® sacrocolpopexy
Vertessa® Lite Y mesh
EXPERIMENTALAll subjects will be predetermined by their surgeon to undergo either a laparoscopic or robotic assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy depending upon their clinical evaluation. The participants will then be randomized to Vertessa® Y sacrocolpopexy
Interventions
Via randomization, 50 surgical subjects will receive Restorelle® Y mesh for the treatment of vaginal vault prolapse.The patient will be blinded as to which mesh they receive.
The subject's surgeon will decide if their patient should have laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy upon their clinical evaluation
Via randomization, 50 surgical subjects will receive Vertessa® lite Y mesh for the treatment of vaginal vault prolapse. The patient will be blinded as to which mesh they receive.
The subject's surgeon will decide if their patient should have robotic assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy upon their clinical evaluation
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age ≥ 18, who are to undergo laparoscopic or robotic laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse
- Other concomitant laparoscopic or prolapse and anti-incontinence procedures (e.g., laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy, cystocele repair, rectocele repair or mid-urethral sling procedures) will be performed at the primary surgeon's discretion.
You may not qualify if:
- Inability to comprehend written and/or spoken English
- Inability to provide informed consent
- Medical illness precluding laparoscopy
- Need for concomitant surgeries not related to pelvic organ prolapse or incontinence
- Sacrocolpoperineopexy
- Need for dual flat mesh for sacrocolpopexy procedure (determined by surgeon)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Cleveland Clinic
Cleveland, Ohio, 44195, United States
Related Publications (7)
Ganatra AM, Rozet F, Sanchez-Salas R, Barret E, Galiano M, Cathelineau X, Vallancien G. The current status of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: a review. Eur Urol. 2009 May;55(5):1089-103. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.01.048. Epub 2009 Feb 4.
PMID: 19201521BACKGROUNDWalters MD, Ridgeway BM. Surgical treatment of vaginal apex prolapse. Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Feb;121(2 Pt 1):354-374. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31827f415c.
PMID: 23344287BACKGROUNDPorges RF, Smilen SW. Long-term analysis of the surgical management of pelvic support defects. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994 Dec;171(6):1518-26; discussion 1526-8. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(94)90395-6.
PMID: 7802061BACKGROUNDBirch C. The use of prosthetics in pelvic reconstructive surgery. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2005 Dec;19(6):979-91. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2005.08.013. Epub 2005 Sep 26.
PMID: 16185932BACKGROUNDChu CC, Welch L. Characterization of morphologic and mechanical properties of surgical mesh fabrics. J Biomed Mater Res. 1985 Oct;19(8):903-16. doi: 10.1002/jbm.820190803.
PMID: 3880350BACKGROUNDKaupp HA, Matulewicz TJ, Lattimer GL, Kremen JE, Celani VJ. Graft infection or graft reaction? Arch Surg. 1979 Dec;114(12):1419-22. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1979.01370360073009.
PMID: 160778BACKGROUNDSalamon CG, Lewis C, Priestley J, Gurshumov E, Culligan PJ. Prospective study of an ultra-lightweight polypropylene Y mesh for robotic sacrocolpopexy. Int Urogynecol J. 2013 Aug;24(8):1371-5. doi: 10.1007/s00192-012-2021-7. Epub 2013 Jan 8.
PMID: 23296684BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Cecile Ferrando, M.D.
- Organization
- Cleveland Clinic
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Cecile A Unger, MD, MPH
Assistant Professor of Surgery. Center for Urogynecology and Pelvic Reconstructive Surgery; Obstetrics/Gynecology and Women's Health Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland OH
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Marie Fidela R Paraiso, MD
Professor, Section Head of the Center for Urogynecology and Pelvic Reconstructive Surgery; Obstetrics/Gynecology and Women's Health Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland OH
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Masking Details
- All patients will be blinded to their assignment, investigators will not be blinded.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 20, 2018
First Posted
September 24, 2018
Study Start
September 18, 2018
Primary Completion
December 19, 2023
Study Completion
December 19, 2023
Last Updated
January 30, 2026
Results First Posted
January 30, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share