Solution Temperature and Fluid Deficit During Hysteroscopy
STOFD
The Influence of Solution Temperature on Fluid Deficit During Hysteroscopy
1 other identifier
interventional
112
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Hysteroscopic surgery is widely used for the treatment of gynecological diseases, such as septum, synechiae, polyp and intrauterine fibroids. The complication rate is estimated as 0.22% and includes uterine perforation, massive bleeding, and fluid overload. Operative hysteroscopy intravascular absorption (OHIA) syndrome refers to fluid overload complications from operative hysteroscopies and is considered a major complication. Report describing the clinical association between irrigation fluid temperature to intravasation rate itself or the risk of fluid overload are limited mainly to theoretical models. Due to the aforementioned, we aim to evaluated the role of temperature on absorption of the irrigation solution in hysteroscopic surgery.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable surgery
Started Dec 2023
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable surgery
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 10, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 18, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2024
CompletedApril 8, 2025
April 1, 2025
7 months
November 10, 2022
April 7, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Median time to reach deficit of 100 cc
The difference to reach deficit of 100 cc in each arm
From recruitment until follow up visit 2 weeks post operation
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Visual analog scale (VAS)
1 hour after the procedure
Total fluid deficit
The time from the beginning to the end of the procedure
Study Arms (2)
Warmed saline
EXPERIMENTAL0.9% Saline will be warmed to 37 degrees Celsius
Room temperature saline
EXPERIMENTAL0.9% Saline will be warmed to 24 degrees Celsius
Interventions
0.9% Saline warmed to 24 degrees Celsius
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- \- All women undergoing gynecologic hysteroscopic surgery.
You may not qualify if:
- Women with known malignancy
- hysteroscopic procedures using alternative solutions (Ringer's lactate, 1.5% glycine, 5% dextrose)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Texas
Houston, Texas, 77030, United States
Related Publications (5)
Lee EB, Park J, Lim HK, Kim YI, Jin Y, Lee KH. Complications of fluid overload during hysteroscopic surgery: cardiomyopathy and epistaxis - A case report. Anesth Pain Med (Seoul). 2020 Jan 31;15(1):61-65. doi: 10.17085/apm.2020.15.1.61.
PMID: 33329791RESULTAydeniz B, Gruber IV, Schauf B, Kurek R, Meyer A, Wallwiener D. A multicenter survey of complications associated with 21,676 operative hysteroscopies. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2002 Sep 10;104(2):160-4. doi: 10.1016/s0301-2115(02)00106-9.
PMID: 12206931RESULTWang MT, Chang CC, Hsieh MH, Chang CW, Fan Chiang YH, Tsai HC. Operative hysteroscopy intravascular absorption syndrome is more than just the gynecological transurethral resection of the prostate syndrome: A case series and literature review. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Sep;59(5):748-753. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2020.07.022.
PMID: 32917330RESULTHahn RG. Fluid absorption in endoscopic surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2006 Jan;96(1):8-20. doi: 10.1093/bja/aei279. Epub 2005 Nov 29.
PMID: 16317031RESULTTuchschmid S, Bajka M, Szczerba D, Lloyd B, Szekely G, Harders M. Modelling intravasation of liquid distension media in surgical simulators. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv. 2007;10(Pt 1):717-24. doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-75757-3_87.
PMID: 18051122RESULT
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Aya Mohr-Sasson
The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principle investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 10, 2022
First Posted
November 18, 2022
Study Start
December 1, 2023
Primary Completion
July 1, 2024
Study Completion
July 1, 2024
Last Updated
April 8, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-04