NCT05620888

Brief Summary

This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of a physical activity promotion intervention focused on walking behavior. The intervention is delivered via mobile application in a sample drawn from the healthy adult population.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
255

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2022

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 3, 2022

Completed
22 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 25, 2022

Completed
23 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 17, 2022

Completed
1.9 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 30, 2024

Completed
8 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 1, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

December 9, 2024

Status Verified

December 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

2 years

First QC Date

October 25, 2022

Last Update Submit

December 4, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

Physical ActivityTailored communicationBehavior ChangeSelf EfficacyHealth Action Process ApproachPersuasive CommunicationWalking

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Change from Baseline in Physical Activity

    Physical activity is assessed with the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ; Mannocci et al., 2010). The scale comprises seven items on Physical Activity providing information about time spent walking, moderate and vigorous intensity, and sedentary activity. The elements are structured to provide separate scores for walking, moderate and vigorous intensity activity, and a combined total score to describe the overall activity level. Data collected with IPAQ are reported as a continuous measure and reported as MET-median minutes.

    Baseline and 30 days

  • Change from Baseline in Walk behavior

    Walk behavior is self-monitored daily. Each evening, participants receive a message and enter the number of steps taken in a specific app section based on the data reported on the smartwatch or the smartphone's native app. The mean number of steps at the intervention's beginning and the end is then calculated. These two measures are compared to verify whether a statistically significant increase in daily steps is observed over time.

    Baseline and 30 days

Other Outcomes (15)

  • Adherence to a healthy lifestyle: diet

    Baseline

  • Adherence to a healthy lifestyle: alcohol consumption

    Baseline

  • Adherence to a healthy lifestyle: smoking

    Baseline

  • +12 more other outcomes

Study Arms (3)

Tailored messages (TM)

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants assigned to this arm receive a daily tailored message on the benefits of taking at least 7000 steps daily. Tailoring concerns change-related expectations, risk perception, planning, retention capacity, resilience, and coping skills and is based on the responses provided by participants at baseline evaluation. In addition, they receive a daily request to declare the number of steps taken (walking self-monitoring).In particular, every evening, the mobile application sends a message to the participants requesting to enter the number of steps taken during the day in a dedicated app section.

Behavioral: Walk behavior change: Tailored messages (TM)

Non tailored messages (NTM)

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants assigned to this arm receive a daily non-tailored message on the emotional benefits of taking at least 7000 steps daily. In addition, they receive a daily request to declare the number of steps taken (walking self-monitoring). In particular, every evening, the mobile application sends a message to the participants requesting to enter the number of steps taken during the day in a dedicated app section.

Behavioral: Walk behavior change: Non tailored messages (NTM)

No messages (NM)

NO INTERVENTION

Participants assigned to this arm receive a daily request to declare the number of steps taken (walking self-monitoring). In particular, every evening, the mobile application sends a message to the participants requesting to enter the number of steps taken during the day in a dedicated app section.

Interventions

Every afternoon at the same time, the mobile application sends a message to the participants of the TM arm. The message is tailored based on the answers provided to the pre-intervention questionnaire. An example message is: "you think you are not able to walk regularly when your morale is low: do not give up because physical activity is also good for the mood!" The intervention is provided for 30 days.

Tailored messages (TM)

Every afternoon at the same time, the mobile application sends a message to the participants of the NTM arm. The message concerns the emotional well-being resulting from the performance of the physical activity and is not tailored. An example message is: "walking regularly in the fresh air improves your mood." The intervention is provided for 30 days.

Non tailored messages (NTM)

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 70 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Participants from the general population, in good health and sedentary
  • A level of education sufficient to understand the procedures of the study and to use a smartphone
  • Having a smartphone

You may not qualify if:

  • The participant always (or almost always) takes at least 7,000 steps a day
  • The participant achieves an IPAQ score equal to or greater than 3000 MET-min / week
  • The participant has symptoms or pathologies that could represent a contraindication to the physical activity proposed by the study. In particular
  • Cardiovascular diseases for which physical activity is allowed only under medical supervision
  • Chest pain during daily activities
  • Drug treatment for cardiovascular diseases
  • Severe arterial hypertension not pharmacologically controlled
  • Episodes of loss of consciousness within the past 12 months
  • Osteoarticular disorders that could be aggravated by a change in the level of physical activity
  • Fractures of the lower limbs, vertebrae, or pelvis in the past six months
  • Walking difficulty
  • Respiratory insufficiency

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of Milano-Bicocca

Milan, MI, 20126, Italy

RECRUITING

Related Publications (14)

  • Davis A, Sweigart R, Ellis R. A systematic review of tailored mHealth interventions for physical activity promotion among adults. Transl Behav Med. 2020 Oct 12;10(5):1221-1232. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibz190.

    PMID: 33044542BACKGROUND
  • Martin-Martin J, Roldan-Jimenez C, De-Torres I, Muro-Culebras A, Escriche-Escuder A, Gonzalez-Sanchez M, Ruiz-Munoz M, Mayoral-Cleries F, Biro A, Tang W, Nikolova B, Salvatore A, Cuesta-Vargas AI. Behavior Change Techniques and the Effects Associated With Digital Behavior Change Interventions in Sedentary Behavior in the Clinical Population: A Systematic Review. Front Digit Health. 2021 Jul 8;3:620383. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2021.620383. eCollection 2021.

    PMID: 34713097BACKGROUND
  • Newsome A, Gilliard T, Phillips A, Dedrick R. Understanding the perceptions of sedentary college students' engagement in physical activity: application of the theory of planned behavior. J Am Coll Health. 2023 Dec;71(9):2813-2822. doi: 10.1080/07448481.2021.1998069. Epub 2021 Nov 17.

    PMID: 34788584BACKGROUND
  • Romeo A, Edney S, Plotnikoff R, Curtis R, Ryan J, Sanders I, Crozier A, Maher C. Can Smartphone Apps Increase Physical Activity? Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2019 Mar 19;21(3):e12053. doi: 10.2196/12053.

    PMID: 30888321BACKGROUND
  • Rowley TW, Lenz EK, Swartz AM, Miller NE, Maeda H, Strath SJ. Efficacy of an Individually Tailored, Internet-Mediated Physical Activity Intervention in Older Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Appl Gerontol. 2019 Jul;38(7):1011-1022. doi: 10.1177/0733464817735396. Epub 2017 Oct 25.

    PMID: 29165018BACKGROUND
  • Steca P, Pancani L, Cesana F, Fattirolli F, Giannattasio C, Greco A, D'Addario M, Monzani D, Cappelletti ER, Magrin ME, Miglioretti M, Sarini M, Scrignaro M, Vecchio L, Franzelli C. Changes in physical activity among coronary and hypertensive patients: A longitudinal study using the Health Action Process Approach. Psychol Health. 2017 Mar;32(3):361-380. doi: 10.1080/08870446.2016.1273353. Epub 2017 Jan 4.

    PMID: 28049344BACKGROUND
  • Tudor-Locke C, Bassett DR Jr. How many steps/day are enough? Preliminary pedometer indices for public health. Sports Med. 2004;34(1):1-8. doi: 10.2165/00007256-200434010-00001.

    PMID: 14715035BACKGROUND
  • Zhang CQ, Zhang R, Schwarzer R, Hagger MS. A meta-analysis of the health action process approach. Health Psychol. 2019 Jul;38(7):623-637. doi: 10.1037/hea0000728. Epub 2019 Apr 11.

    PMID: 30973747BACKGROUND
  • Carfora V, Caso D, Palumbo F, Conner M. Promoting water intake. The persuasiveness of a messaging intervention based on anticipated negative affective reactions and self-monitoring. Appetite. 2018 Nov 1;130:236-246. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2018.08.017. Epub 2018 Aug 16.

    PMID: 30121311BACKGROUND
  • Morisky DE, Green LW, Levine DM. Concurrent and predictive validity of a self-reported measure of medication adherence. Med Care. 1986 Jan;24(1):67-74. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198601000-00007.

    PMID: 3945130BACKGROUND
  • Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 1991; 50(2): 179-211.

    BACKGROUND
  • Mannocci A, Di Thiene D, Del Cimmuto A, Masala D, Boccia A, De Vito E, La Torre G. International Physical Activity Questionnaire: validation and assessment in an Italian sample. Italian Journal of Public Health. 2012; 7(4)

    BACKGROUND
  • Schwarzer R. Modeling health behavior change: How to predict and modify the adoption and maintenance of health behaviors. Applied Psychology. 2008; 57(1): 1-29

    BACKGROUND
  • Adorni R, Zanatta F, Serino S, Vanutelli ME, Caso D, D'Addario M, Steca P. Efficacy of a theory-based and tailored mHealth intervention promoting walking behavior: a preliminary randomized controlled trial. Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 18;15(1):26033. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-09634-3.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Sedentary BehaviorMotor Activity

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Behavior

Study Officials

  • Marco D'Addario, PhD

    University of Milano Bicocca

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Patrizia Steca, PhD

    University of Milano Bicocca

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Roberta Adorni, PhD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Masking Details
The baseline assessment, the intervention, and the post-intervention assessment are provided automatically via the mobile app. In addition, participants are randomly assigned to a specific experimental group before starting the study and do not know which experimental group they are assigned. These features of the study minimize observer bias.
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Associate Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 25, 2022

First Posted

November 17, 2022

Study Start

October 3, 2022

Primary Completion

September 30, 2024

Study Completion

June 1, 2025

Last Updated

December 9, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-12

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations