NCT05332145

Brief Summary

The study has two aims: (1) to develop and examine the acceptability of the technological and theoretical frameworks of MAP to Health and (2) to determine whether MAP to Health is related to changes in theoretically identified mechanisms of behavior change (meaning salience, basic psychological needs satisfaction, and internal motivation). In an exploratory aim, the study will assess how the intervention and mechanisms of change are related to changes in physical activity. Participants will be adults in midlife (ages 40-64) who are insufficiently active, are interested in increasing physical activity, do not have contraindications to engaging in physical activity, and are patients in a large healthcare system in the Midwest.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
35

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2022

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 4, 2022

Completed
14 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 18, 2022

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 4, 2022

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 3, 2023

Completed
1 day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 4, 2023

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

December 6, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

December 6, 2023

Status Verified

June 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

6 months

First QC Date

April 4, 2022

Results QC Date

August 30, 2023

Last Update Submit

December 4, 2023

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

  • Meaning Salience

    The Meaning Awareness Scale is a 6-item self-report measure that assesses meaning salience. Participants rate the extent to which they were aware of meaning over the past day (e.g, "I was aware of the meaning in my life" on a 7-point Likert type scale ranging from 1 (rarely) to 7 (very often). Items are averaged for a total score (range, 1-7). Participants complete the scale on three random days during each of the four assessment periods and total scores are averaged across those three days. A higher score signifies greater meaning salience, a better outcome.

    12 weeks

  • Basic Psychological Needs Satisfaction

    The Psychological Needs Satisfaction in Exercise Scale is a self-report measure used to assess participants' satisfaction of three basic psychological needs (autonomy, competence, and relatedness) in exercise. The scale has 18 items that participants rate on a 6-point Likert-type scale ranging from 1 (false) to 6 (true). Items are averaged within each subscale (autonomy, competence, and relatedness) with possible scores ranging from 1-6. Higher scores indicate greater satisfaction of autonomy, competence and relatedness, a better outcome.

    12 weeks

  • Autonomous Motivation

    • Autonomous motivation was measured using the Behavioral Regulations in Exercise Questionnaire, version 4. The 28-item self-report measure assesses motivations for exercise on the self-determination theory continuum. There are 7 subscales with 4 items each (intrinsic, integrated, identified, introjected - approach, introjected - avoidance, external, and amotivation). Items are summed within each subscale (total score range, 4-28). The subscales were combined using a bifurcation approach, where subscale scores were averaged into two subscales: autonomous (intrinsic, integrated, and identified, total score range 4-28) and controlled motivation (introjected-approach, introjected - avoidance, and external, total score range, 4-28). Higher scores on the autonomous subscale indicate greater internalized motivation, a positive outcome, whereas higher scores on the controlled subscale indicates greater external motivation, a negative outcome.

    12 weeks

  • Technology Acceptance

    Participants answered 10 questions rating the extent to which they found the MAP to Health intervention easy to use (4 items) and useful (4-items) and their intentions to use the intervention in the future (2 items). Survey questions were based on previous research and modified for the purposes of this study. Participants rated each item on a scale from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). Items were averaged within each subscale, with possible total scores ranging from 1-5. A higher score represents greater technology acceptance, a better outcome.

    within 1 week post-intervention

Study Arms (1)

Intervention development and testing

EXPERIMENTAL

Phase 1 participants (N=12) will complete the MAP to Health online interview and rate the ease of use, usefulness, intention to use, and theoretical fidelity of the intervention. Phase 2 participants (N=35) will participate in a proof-of-concept pilot trial via a double-pretest single group design. Participants will complete a 4-week pretest monitoring period and an 8-week pilot trial of the intervention, with assessments of Self-Determination Theory mechanisms and meaning salience at pretest (-4 weeks), baseline (0 weeks), midpoint (4 weeks) and posttest (8 weeks). In addition, participants will wear accelerometers to assess physical activity during the 12 week period.

Behavioral: MAP to Health

Interventions

MAP to HealthBEHAVIORAL

In Phase 1, participants will complete the web-based interview and Aim 1 measures, assessing acceptability and usability of the intervention. The investigators will review whether the intervention appropriately gathers information needed to program theory-based, personalized text messages. After completing the measures, a list of text messages for that participant will be generated and sent to the participant for review. Participants will review the text messages and rate the extent to which the messages are personalized. In Phase 2, the investigators will conduct a proof-of-concept pilot trial in which participants will complete a 4-week pretest monitoring period and an 8-week pilot trial of the intervention, with assessments of Self-Determination Theory mechanisms and meaning salience at pretest (-4 weeks), baseline (0 weeks), midpoint (4 weeks) and posttest (8 weeks). In addition, participants will wear accelerometers to assess physical activity during the 12 weeks.

Intervention development and testing

Eligibility Criteria

Age40 Years - 64 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Midlife (ages 40-64 at enrollment)
  • Able to read and understand English
  • Insufficiently active (engaging in ≥10 and ≤90 min of physical activity/week)
  • Intention to increase physical activity in the next 30 days
  • Has consistent access to a phone with text-messaging capability

You may not qualify if:

  • Greater than minimal risk to starting a physical activity program (Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire score \> 0)
  • Body Mass Index (BMI)≥ 40
  • Currently pregnant
  • Has opted out of research
  • Diagnosis of metastatic cancer or cardiovascular disease
  • Residing in a nursing home or long-term care facility
  • Cognitive or psychiatric conditions that preclude completion of questionnaires, including dementia diagnosis
  • Diagnosis of severe psychiatric disorder (e.g., Bipolar Disorder, Schizophrenia)
  • Diagnosis of substance use disorder or AUDIT-C62 \>3 for women or \>4 for men

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

HealthPartners Institute

Bloomington, Minnesota, 55425, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Sedentary Behavior

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Behavior

Results Point of Contact

Title
Stephanie Hooker, PhD, MPH
Organization
HealthPartners Institute

Study Officials

  • Stephanie Hooker, PhD

    HealthPartners Institute

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Model Details: In Phase 1, the investigators will develop the MAP to Health web-based interview that will be used to explore what is particularly meaningful to participants, how physical activity is consistent with those goals, and what activities patients plan to engage in. Participants (N=12) will complete the interview and rate the ease of use, usefulness, intention to use, and theoretical fidelity of the intervention. In Phase 2, the investigators will conduct a proof-of-concept pilot trial using a double-pretest single group design. Participants (N=35) will complete a 4-week pretest monitoring period and an 8-week pilot trial of the intervention, with assessments of Self-Determination Theory mechanisms and meaning salience at pretest (-4 weeks), baseline (0 weeks), midpoint (4 weeks) and posttest (8 weeks). In addition, participants will wear accelerometers to assess physical activity during the 12 weeks.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 4, 2022

First Posted

April 18, 2022

Study Start

November 4, 2022

Primary Completion

May 3, 2023

Study Completion

May 4, 2023

Last Updated

December 6, 2023

Results First Posted

December 6, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-06

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

If approved by HealthPartners Office for Compliance and Integrity and the HealthPartners Institutional Review Board, the investigators will also follow our local standard operating procedures for data de-identification at the conclusion of the study and provide de-identified datasets to National Institute on Aging and posted on a generalist data repository (e.g., Open Science Framework) in a preferred format. Datasets will also be provided to other qualified researchers at written request.

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ANALYTIC CODE

Locations