MAP to Health Pilot Study: A Physical Activity Intervention for Midlife Adults
MAP
Development and Proof-of-Concept Trial of a Meaning- and Theory-based Physical Activity Intervention
2 other identifiers
interventional
35
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The study has two aims: (1) to develop and examine the acceptability of the technological and theoretical frameworks of MAP to Health and (2) to determine whether MAP to Health is related to changes in theoretically identified mechanisms of behavior change (meaning salience, basic psychological needs satisfaction, and internal motivation). In an exploratory aim, the study will assess how the intervention and mechanisms of change are related to changes in physical activity. Participants will be adults in midlife (ages 40-64) who are insufficiently active, are interested in increasing physical activity, do not have contraindications to engaging in physical activity, and are patients in a large healthcare system in the Midwest.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2022
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 4, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 18, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 4, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 3, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 4, 2023
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
December 6, 2023
CompletedDecember 6, 2023
June 1, 2023
6 months
April 4, 2022
August 30, 2023
December 4, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Meaning Salience
The Meaning Awareness Scale is a 6-item self-report measure that assesses meaning salience. Participants rate the extent to which they were aware of meaning over the past day (e.g, "I was aware of the meaning in my life" on a 7-point Likert type scale ranging from 1 (rarely) to 7 (very often). Items are averaged for a total score (range, 1-7). Participants complete the scale on three random days during each of the four assessment periods and total scores are averaged across those three days. A higher score signifies greater meaning salience, a better outcome.
12 weeks
Basic Psychological Needs Satisfaction
The Psychological Needs Satisfaction in Exercise Scale is a self-report measure used to assess participants' satisfaction of three basic psychological needs (autonomy, competence, and relatedness) in exercise. The scale has 18 items that participants rate on a 6-point Likert-type scale ranging from 1 (false) to 6 (true). Items are averaged within each subscale (autonomy, competence, and relatedness) with possible scores ranging from 1-6. Higher scores indicate greater satisfaction of autonomy, competence and relatedness, a better outcome.
12 weeks
Autonomous Motivation
• Autonomous motivation was measured using the Behavioral Regulations in Exercise Questionnaire, version 4. The 28-item self-report measure assesses motivations for exercise on the self-determination theory continuum. There are 7 subscales with 4 items each (intrinsic, integrated, identified, introjected - approach, introjected - avoidance, external, and amotivation). Items are summed within each subscale (total score range, 4-28). The subscales were combined using a bifurcation approach, where subscale scores were averaged into two subscales: autonomous (intrinsic, integrated, and identified, total score range 4-28) and controlled motivation (introjected-approach, introjected - avoidance, and external, total score range, 4-28). Higher scores on the autonomous subscale indicate greater internalized motivation, a positive outcome, whereas higher scores on the controlled subscale indicates greater external motivation, a negative outcome.
12 weeks
Technology Acceptance
Participants answered 10 questions rating the extent to which they found the MAP to Health intervention easy to use (4 items) and useful (4-items) and their intentions to use the intervention in the future (2 items). Survey questions were based on previous research and modified for the purposes of this study. Participants rated each item on a scale from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). Items were averaged within each subscale, with possible total scores ranging from 1-5. A higher score represents greater technology acceptance, a better outcome.
within 1 week post-intervention
Study Arms (1)
Intervention development and testing
EXPERIMENTALPhase 1 participants (N=12) will complete the MAP to Health online interview and rate the ease of use, usefulness, intention to use, and theoretical fidelity of the intervention. Phase 2 participants (N=35) will participate in a proof-of-concept pilot trial via a double-pretest single group design. Participants will complete a 4-week pretest monitoring period and an 8-week pilot trial of the intervention, with assessments of Self-Determination Theory mechanisms and meaning salience at pretest (-4 weeks), baseline (0 weeks), midpoint (4 weeks) and posttest (8 weeks). In addition, participants will wear accelerometers to assess physical activity during the 12 week period.
Interventions
In Phase 1, participants will complete the web-based interview and Aim 1 measures, assessing acceptability and usability of the intervention. The investigators will review whether the intervention appropriately gathers information needed to program theory-based, personalized text messages. After completing the measures, a list of text messages for that participant will be generated and sent to the participant for review. Participants will review the text messages and rate the extent to which the messages are personalized. In Phase 2, the investigators will conduct a proof-of-concept pilot trial in which participants will complete a 4-week pretest monitoring period and an 8-week pilot trial of the intervention, with assessments of Self-Determination Theory mechanisms and meaning salience at pretest (-4 weeks), baseline (0 weeks), midpoint (4 weeks) and posttest (8 weeks). In addition, participants will wear accelerometers to assess physical activity during the 12 weeks.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Midlife (ages 40-64 at enrollment)
- Able to read and understand English
- Insufficiently active (engaging in ≥10 and ≤90 min of physical activity/week)
- Intention to increase physical activity in the next 30 days
- Has consistent access to a phone with text-messaging capability
You may not qualify if:
- Greater than minimal risk to starting a physical activity program (Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire score \> 0)
- Body Mass Index (BMI)≥ 40
- Currently pregnant
- Has opted out of research
- Diagnosis of metastatic cancer or cardiovascular disease
- Residing in a nursing home or long-term care facility
- Cognitive or psychiatric conditions that preclude completion of questionnaires, including dementia diagnosis
- Diagnosis of severe psychiatric disorder (e.g., Bipolar Disorder, Schizophrenia)
- Diagnosis of substance use disorder or AUDIT-C62 \>3 for women or \>4 for men
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- HealthPartners Institutelead
- National Institute on Aging (NIA)collaborator
Study Sites (1)
HealthPartners Institute
Bloomington, Minnesota, 55425, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Stephanie Hooker, PhD, MPH
- Organization
- HealthPartners Institute
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Stephanie Hooker, PhD
HealthPartners Institute
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 4, 2022
First Posted
April 18, 2022
Study Start
November 4, 2022
Primary Completion
May 3, 2023
Study Completion
May 4, 2023
Last Updated
December 6, 2023
Results First Posted
December 6, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ANALYTIC CODE
If approved by HealthPartners Office for Compliance and Integrity and the HealthPartners Institutional Review Board, the investigators will also follow our local standard operating procedures for data de-identification at the conclusion of the study and provide de-identified datasets to National Institute on Aging and posted on a generalist data repository (e.g., Open Science Framework) in a preferred format. Datasets will also be provided to other qualified researchers at written request.