A Post-market Observational ORIGIN® CR Clinical Study
1 other identifier
observational
199
1 country
2
Brief Summary
The study objective is to evaluate safety and performance of the ORIGIN® CR (cruciate retaining) devices and associated instruments, more precisely to evaluate safety by the proportion of patients requiring a revision (i.e. revision rate) at 1-year post procedure and to evaluate performance by means of a Knee Society Score (KSS) Knee Score at 1 year post procedure and by means of a KSS Function Score also at 1 year post procedure. The hypothesis raised for this study, regarding the scoring, is that patients will experience a marked improvement in the natural feel of the prosthesis during the first year after the surgery, and slightly significant improvement at the following interval of 2 years. The overall patient satisfaction is expected to be improved after 2 years follow-up with ORIGIN® CR.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Jul 2024
Typical duration for all trials
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 27, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 7, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 10, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2028
October 8, 2024
October 1, 2024
3.3 years
October 27, 2022
October 3, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Evaluate safety by the proportion of required revisions
Proportion of patients requiring a revision after 1-year post-procedure. The revision rate is consistent with the state of the art - Orthopaedic Data Evaluation Panel (ODEP) benchmark system (revision rate not higher than 2.5% to 3.5% at 1 year, 4% to 6% at 5 years and 5% to 7% at 10 years).
1 year post-procedure
Evaluate performance
Evaluate performance by means of following questionnaires: Knee Society Score (KSS) and a Knee Society Function score, a partient-reported outcome measure. The KSS contains questions in 2 sections: knee joint (pain, range of motion, stability) and function (walking distance, ability to climb stairs). When calculating the score, deductions are taken for assistive devices and flexion contractures, misalignment, or extension lag. The maximum points which can be reached are 100 points. * Clinical status assessed by means of the KSS Knee score at 1 year post procedure * Clinical status assessed by means of the KSS Function score at 1 year post procedure
1 year post-procedure
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Evaluate safety by the proportion of required revisions
2 years post procedure
Performance on patient satisfaction
1- and 2-years post-procedure
Quality of Life post-procedure measured by the Knee Society score and Knee Society function questionnaire
1- and 2-years post-procedure
Quality of Life post-procedure measured by the Forgotten Joint Score questionnaire
1- and 2- years post-procedure
Interventions
It is planned to include consecutive eligible subjects which will be treated with the ORIGIN® CR devices.
Eligibility Criteria
Patients who have provided consent for the collection of their data and met the protocol eligibility criteria.
You may qualify if:
- Male and female over 18 years of age
- Each patient who is willing to give informed consent.
- Clinically indicated for a total knee replacement
- Females who are not pregnant and not planning to become pregnant ≤ 12 months. A pregnancy test should be performed for women of childbearing age
- Geographically stable and willing to return to the implanting site for all follow-up visits at 1 year and 2 years.
You may not qualify if:
- Acute or chronic, local or systemic infection
- Muscular, ligamental, neurological, psychological or vascular deficits
- Bone destruction or poor bone quality likely to affect implant stability (requiring a femoral and/or a tibial stem and/or a thick insert)
- Any concomitant condition likely to affect implant integration or function
- Allergy or hypersensitivity to any of the materials used
- For devices in CoCrMo (ISO 5832/4): renal and hepatic impairment
- Hip Knee Ankle (HKA) angle \< 165° or \> 195°
- Severe collateral ligaments deficiency (requiring a more constrained prosthesis)
- Posterior cruciate ligament deficiency
- Major anatomical deformities
- Severe flexion contracture or severe recurvatum
- Revision of a partial or total knee prosthesis
- Non-extractible material (e.g. screws, plate, intramedullary nail, osteosynthesis material…) which can create a conflict with any component of the prosthesis
- Distal and/or posterior and/or anterior femoral bone loss which exceeds the femoral component thickness
- Proximal tibial bone loss which exceeds the tibial component thickness (tibial tray + tibial insert)
- +1 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
GZA Ziekenhuizen - campus Sint-Augustinus
Antwerp, 2610, Belgium
AZ Voorkempen
Malle, 2390, Belgium
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 27, 2022
First Posted
November 7, 2022
Study Start
July 10, 2024
Primary Completion (Estimated)
November 1, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
February 1, 2028
Last Updated
October 8, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share