Comparison of Different Periodontal Classifications

NCT05604703 | Completed

• 1 other identifier: 2021/02-06
• Study Type: observational
• Target: 300
• Locations: 1 country
• Sites: 1

Brief Summary

Due to some deficiencies in the classification defined by Armitage in 1999, a new periodontal classification was published in 2018. New periodontitis A staging and grading system was used for classification. Staging depends largely on the severity of the disease, while grading is based on the rate of disease progression to the past. It provides additional information on a risk-based analysis and assessment of risk.The aim of this study is to reveal the differences between the old periodontal classification and the new periodontal disease classification published in 2018. Periodontitis in the literature review. The two classifications were compared in patients. However, a study on gingival recession not done. Anamnesis, routine periodontal indices, routine radiographs of 300 patients, first of all According to the 1999 Periodontal Disease Classification, after it will be classified according to the New Periodontal Disease Classification developed in 2018. Thus, two different Periodontal Disease Classifications, old and new, comparison will be made.

Conditions

Periodontal Diseases

Keywords

2018 new periodontal classification; periodontal diseases; Armitage periodontal classification

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

• Number of aggressıve or chronic periodontitis patients according to 1999 armitage periodontal classification

  The age and systemic diseases of the patient are learned and the pocket depth, alveolar bone and attachment loss are measured and classified as localized or generalized with aggressive or chronic periodontitis.

  T0=baseline

• New periodontal classifıcatıon stage

  Number of patients according to Staging depends on the severity of the disease; clinical attachment loss, amount and percentage of bone loss, probing depth, angular the presence and extent of bone defects and furcation involvement, tooth mobility, and tooth loss. determined by considering the variables.

  T0=baseline

• New periodontal classifıcatıon grade

  Number of patients according to Grading is based on the rate of disease progression. It reflects an analysis based on diabetes and varies depending on the HbA1c value if the patient has diabetes, the number of cigarettes smoked, and the bone loss/age ratio.

  T0=baseline

Interventions

Periodontal classification DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

300 patients will be classified according to 1999 armitage and 2018 new periodontal classification and compared.

Eligibility Criteria

• Age: 18 Years - 99 Years
• Sex: all
• Healthy Volunteers: Yes
• Age Groups: Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
• Sampling Method: Probability Sample

Study Population

Apply to Kütahya University of Health Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Periodontology.

You may qualify if:

• be over 18 years old
• Patients with recorded periodontal indices and radiographs
• Patients without disease affecting bone metabolism

You may not qualify if:

• Mentally retarded patients
• Pregnant and breastfeeding patients
• Patients receiving radiotherapy
• Patients who do not use drugs that impair bone metabolism such as bisphosphonates

Sponsors & Collaborators

• Kutahya Health Sciences University: lead

Study Sites (1)

Kütahya Health Sciences University Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Periodontology

Kütahya, 43100, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

Related Publications (5)

• Armitage GC. Development of a classification system for periodontal diseases and conditions. Ann Periodontol. 1999 Dec;4(1):1-6. doi: 10.1902/annals.1999.4.1.1.

  PMID: 10863370 BACKGROUND

• Caton JG, Armitage G, Berglundh T, Chapple ILC, Jepsen S, Kornman KS, Mealey BL, Papapanou PN, Sanz M, Tonetti MS. A new classification scheme for periodontal and peri-implant diseases and conditions - Introduction and key changes from the 1999 classification. J Clin Periodontol. 2018 Jun;45 Suppl 20:S1-S8. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12935.

  PMID: 29926489 BACKGROUND

• Miller PD Jr. A classification of marginal tissue recession. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1985;5(2):8-13. No abstract available.

  PMID: 3858267 BACKGROUND

• Graetz C, Mann L, Krois J, Salzer S, Kahl M, Springer C, Schwendicke F. Comparison of periodontitis patients' classification in the 2018 versus 1999 classification. J Clin Periodontol. 2019 Sep;46(9):908-917. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.13157. Epub 2019 Jun 28.

  PMID: 31152600 BACKGROUND

• Guttiganur N, Aspalli S, Sanikop MV, Desai A, Gaddale R, Devanoorkar A. Classification systems for gingival recession and suggestion of a new classification system. Indian J Dent Res. 2018 Mar-Apr;29(2):233-237. doi: 10.4103/ijdr.IJDR_207_17.

  PMID: 29652020 BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Periodontal Diseases

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Mouth Diseases; Stomatognathic Diseases

Study Officials

• Berceste Güler

  Kütahya Health Sciences University

  STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

• Study Type: observational
• Observational Model: COHORT
• Time Perspective: RETROSPECTIVE
• Sponsor Type: OTHER
• Responsible Party: PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
• PI Title: Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

• First Submitted: October 30, 2022
• First Posted: November 3, 2022
• Study Start: April 1, 2021
• Primary Completion: January 1, 2022
• Study Completion: April 15, 2022
• Last Updated: October 15, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-08

Data Sharing

• IPD Sharing: Will share
• Shared Documents: STUDY PROTOCOL, CSR
• Time Frame: After the research paper is published.
• Access Criteria: The IPD will be shared if the principal investigator is contacted.

Locations

TU (1)