Comparison of Mucin Levels at the Ocular Surface of Visual Display Users With and Without Dry Eye Disease
1 other identifier
observational
94
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The study aimed to evaluate 1) if levels of the glycocalyx membrane mucins, including MUC1, MUC4, MUC16 and MUC20, are altered in conjunctival cells of visual display users With and Without Dry Eye Disease, and 2) if mucin levels correlate with dry eye clinical diagnostic data.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Mar 2021
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 2, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 2, 2021
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 29, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 3, 2022
CompletedNovember 23, 2022
October 1, 2022
6 months
October 29, 2022
November 20, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
mucin expression
The mRNA expression of mucin was measured by Quantitative real-time PCR, which is a laboratory technique of molecular biology to find out how much of a specific section of DNA there is in a sample.
immediately after meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria
Study Arms (2)
dry eye disease
Dry eye disease was diagnosed according to the Tear Film and Ocular Surface Society (TFOS) DEWS II criteria: (1) Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) score ≥ 13 and (2) one of these signs; fluorescein tear breakup time (TBUT) \<10 sec; abnormal ocular surface staining (\>5 corneal spots or \> 9 conjunctival spots).
control
The controll group enrolled healthy participants without ocular and systemic diseases.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
Video display terminals users with and without dry eye disease.
You may qualify if:
- Participants who exposed to video display terminals for more than 1 year (at least 5 days per week and 6 hours per day) were enrolled and divided into two groups: (1) VDT users with DED and (2) VDT users without DED. DED was diagnosed according to the Tear Film and Ocular Surface Society (TFOS) DEWS II criteria: (1) Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) score ≥ 13 and (2) one of these signs; fluorescein tear breakup time (TBUT) \<10 sec; abnormal ocular surface staining (\>5 corneal spots or \> 9 conjunctival spots).
You may not qualify if:
- a history of contact lens wear or ocular surgery within 2 year of the study visit; a history of previous ocular disease; topical or systemic therapies other than artificial tears within two weeks before recruitment; and inflammatory ocular diseases, ocular surface diseases, glaucoma and systemic diseases with ocular involvement, such as meibomian gland dysfunction, diabetes, and peripheral neuropathy.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Peking University Third Hospital
Beijing, 100191, China
Biospecimen
Conjunctival impression cytology samples
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Hong Qi, PhD
Peking University Third Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- OTHER
- Time Perspective
- CROSS SECTIONAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 29, 2022
First Posted
November 3, 2022
Study Start
March 1, 2021
Primary Completion
September 2, 2021
Study Completion
September 2, 2021
Last Updated
November 23, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-10