Analysis of Clinical Effect of Subanesthetic Dose of Esketamine Combined With Hip Capsule Peripheral Nerve Block in Elderly Patients Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty
Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital of Changzhou Affiliated to Nanjing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine
1 other identifier
interventional
120
1 country
1
Brief Summary
To observe the clinical effect of esketamine combined with hip capsule peripheral nerve block in elderly patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty. A total of 120 elderly patients who underwent total hip arthroplasty in our hospital from January 2020 to May 2021 were randomly divided into three groups, 40 cases in each group. The observation group A was treated with esketamine subanesthetic dose combined with hip capsule peripheral nerve block, the control group B was treated with esketamine subanesthetic dose combined with lumbar plexus block, and the control group C was treated with esketamine subanesthetic dose for general anesthesia. The onset time of anesthesia, duration of block, postoperative recovery time, postoperative extubation time, MAP and HR indexes before anesthesia (T0), during skin incision (T1), 30 minutes after the start of surgery (T2), and at the end of surgery (T3) were recorded in the three groups, and the VAS score and Ramsay score at 0.5 h, 2 h, 6 h, 12 h, and 24 h after surgery, as well as the incidence of postoperative adverse reactions were recorded in the three groups.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2020
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 31, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 31, 2021
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 20, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 2, 2022
CompletedNovember 2, 2022
October 1, 2022
1.4 years
September 20, 2022
October 26, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (23)
Anesthesia indicators
Add a onset time of anesthesia Outcome Measure
onset time of anesthesia 5 minutes
Anesthesia indicators
Add a duration of block Outcome Measure
duration of block time 350 minutes
Anesthesia indicators
Add a postoperative recovery time Outcome Measure
postoperative recovery time 15 minutes
Anesthesia indicators
Add a postoperative extubation time Outcome Measure
postoperative extubation time 17 minutes
Vital signs
mean arterial pressure before anesthesia (T0)
before anesthesia (T0)
Vital signs
mean arterial pressure during skin incision (T1)
during skin incision (T1)
Vital signs
mean arterial pressure 30 minutes after the start of surgery (T2)
30 minutes after the start of surgery (T2)
Vital signs
mean arterial pressure at the end of surgery (T3)
at the end of surgery (T3) 85 minutes
Vital signs
heart rate before anesthesia (T0)
before anesthesia (T0)
Vital signs
heart rate 30 minutes during skin incision (T1)
during skin incision (T1)
Vital signs
heart rate after the start of surgery (T2)
after the start of surgery (T2)
Vital signs
heart rate at the end of surgery (T3)
at the end of surgery (T3) 78 minutes
Visual Analogue Scale
Visual Analogue Scale score (0 is no pain; 0 \~ 4 is mild pain; 4 \~ 7 is moderate pain; 7 \~ 10 is severe pain)
0.5hour
Visual Analogue Scale
Visual Analogue Scale score (0 is no pain; 0 \~ 4 is mild pain; 4 \~ 7 is moderate pain; 7 \~ 10 is severe pain)
2hour
Visual Analogue Scale
Visual Analogue Scale score (0 is no pain; 0 \~ 4 is mild pain; 4 \~ 7 is moderate pain; 7 \~ 10 is severe pain)
6hour
Visual Analogue Scale
Visual Analogue Scale score (0 is no pain; 0 \~ 4 is mild pain; 4 \~ 7 is moderate pain; 7 \~ 10 is severe pain)
12hour
Visual Analogue Scale
Visual Analogue Scale score (0 is no pain; 0 \~ 4 is mild pain; 4 \~ 7 is moderate pain; 7 \~ 10 is severe pain)
24hour
Ramsay sedation score
Ramsay score (range 0\~6 points, 1 point for insufficient sedation, 2\~4 points for good sedation, 5\~6 points for excessive sedation)
0.5hour
Ramsay sedation score
Ramsay score (range 0\~6 points, 1 point for insufficient sedation, 2\~4 points for good sedation, 5\~6 points for excessive sedation)
2hour
Ramsay sedation score
Ramsay score (range 0\~6 points, 1 point for insufficient sedation, 2\~4 points for good sedation, 5\~6 points for excessive sedation)
6hour
Ramsay sedation score
Ramsay score (range 0\~6 points, 1 point for insufficient sedation, 2\~4 points for good sedation, 5\~6 points for excessive sedation)
12hour
Ramsay sedation score
Ramsay score (range 0\~6 points, 1 point for insufficient sedation, 2\~4 points for good sedation, 5\~6 points for excessive sedation)
24hour
Adverse reactions
the incidence of postoperative delirium, nausea and vomiting, drowsiness, skin itching and other adverse reactions
at the end of surgery 48 hours
Study Arms (3)
The observation group A
EXPERIMENTALThe use of esketamine sub-anesthetic dose combined with hip capsule peripheral nerve block. The patients were subjected to local anesthesia and punctured through the left radial artery for invasive arterial blood pressure monitoring. Anesthesia induction: the observation group followed by intravenous injection of ketamine 0.2mg/kg, sufentanil 0.3μg/kg, Cyclophenol 0.3mg/kg, midazolam 2mg, rocuronium 0.6mg/kg. After the onset of the drug endotracheal intubation, connect anesthesia machine control breathing. Anesthesia was maintained with 1%\~2% sevoflurane inhalation, remifentanil infusion rate was 0.2\~0.3 μg/kg·min, sevoflurane was stopped 30 min before the end of the operation. Patient-controlled intravenous analgesia pump (PCIA) was given for postoperative analgesia. PCIA formula: sufentanil 100ug+ondansetron 8mg+ketorolac tromethamine 60mg+saline to 100ml, pump speed 2ml/h, automatic single dose 3ml, lock time 20min.
the control group B
ACTIVE COMPARATOREsketamine subanesthetic dose combined with lumbar plexus block was used. The patient was placed in the healthy lateral decubitus position and ultrasound-guided puncture was performed 4 cm beside the 3rd and 4th lumbar vertebrae (Figure 1B、C). The frequency of the ultrasound probe was 2-5 MHz, and the probe was adjusted until the images below the transverse processes of the 3rd to 5th lumbar vertebrae and the psoas muscle were clearly displayed, and the needle was inserted close to the probe and retracted in the lumbar plexus, and sufentanil 0.5 μg/kg, propofol 1.5 mg/kg, and rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg were injected after no blood extraction. General anesthesia was then performed using a subanesthetic dose of esketamine and the same maintenance and postoperative analgesic measures were used as in group A.
the control group C
ACTIVE COMPARATORgeneral anesthesia was performed with esketamine subanesthetic dose. The same maintenance and postoperative analgesia measures were used as in group A.
Interventions
Esketamine subanesthetic dose combined with lumbar plexus block was used
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients aged ≥ 60 years
- American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) II or III
- No serious coronary heart disease, hypertension, diabetes and related complications, no serious liver and kidney function damage, no mental illness
You may not qualify if:
- Allergic to ketamine
- Abnormal coagulation function
- Mental system diseases or cognitive dysfunction
- Severe liver and kidney dysfunction
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
ChangzhouTCMH
Changzhou, Jiangsu, 213000, China
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Yanhua Huo, BM
Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital of Changzhou Affiliated to Nanjing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Doctor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 20, 2022
First Posted
November 2, 2022
Study Start
January 1, 2020
Primary Completion
May 31, 2021
Study Completion
May 31, 2021
Last Updated
November 2, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-10