The ReTAVI Prospective Observational Registry
Evaluation of Clinical Outcomes of Patients Undergoing a Redo-TAVI Procedure; a Multicenter Prospective Observational Registry
1 other identifier
observational
250
11 countries
62
Brief Summary
Patients with severe aortic stenosis (sAS) treated with transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) (increasingly younger \& lower risk pts) are experiencing SVD of the index THV and thus developing an indication for a redo-TAVI procedure. The evidence on redo-TAVI (where a transcatheter heart valve \[THV\] is implanted into another THV) is limited, with initial data showing acceptable safety as well efficacy in highly selected and limited populations. Aim is to evaluate short- and long-term data on patients undergoing transcatheter redo-TAVI procedures with THVs for failure of a previously implanted THV and to determine VARC-3 defined efficacy and safety at 30 days and functional outcome at 1 year, 3 years and 5 years.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Sep 2023
Longer than P75 for all trials
62 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 7, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 1, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 5, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2031
August 20, 2025
August 1, 2025
3.2 years
October 7, 2022
August 14, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (9)
Efficacy: VARC-3 defined device success at 30 days
Determine VARC-3 defined device success at 30 days * Technical success * Freedom from mortality * Freedom from surgery or intervention related to the device or a major vascular or access-related or cardiac structural complication * Intended performance of the valve (mean gradient \<20 mmHg, peak velocity \<3 m/s, Doppler velocity index ≥0.25, and less than moderate aortic regurgitation) (Different definitions, in addition to the predefined such as the consideration of higher gradients than 20 mmHg, will be explored) These events will be adjudicated. Number and percentage of subjects with device success at 30 days as per VARC-3 definition, along with individual component of the success, will be presented.
30 days
Technical success: Technical success (at exit from procedure room)
Technical success at exit from procedure room defined as: * Freedom from mortality * Successful access, delivery of the device, and retrieval of the delivery system * Correct positioning of a single prosthetic heart valve into the proper anatomical location * Freedom from surgery or intervention related to the device (excluding pacemaker) or to a major vascular or access-related, or cardiac structural complication Number and percentage of subjects with technical success at exit from procedure room, along with individual component of the success, will be presented.
end of intervention
Safety: VARC-3 defined early safety at 30 days
Determine VARC-3 defined early safety at 30 days: * Freedom from all-cause mortality * Freedom from all Stroke * Freedom from all VARC type 2-4 bleeding * Freedom from all major vascular, access-related, or cardiac structural complication * Freedom from all acute kidney injury stage III/IV * Freedom from all moderate/severe aortic regurgitation * Freedom from all new permanent pacemaker implantations due to procedure-related conduction abnormalities * Freedom from all surgery/intervention related to the device These events will be adjudicated. Number and percentage of subjects with early safety at 30 days as per VARC-3 definition, along with individual component of the success, will be presented.
30 days
Procedural Outcomes (30 days)
Procedural outcomes at 30 days, defined as: * Clinical and anatomical predictors of technical success (type of SVD \[stenosis vs. regurgitation\], valve size, implant depth, redo-TAVI balloon dilation, CT and echo-derived variables, etc.) * Rate of central and paravalvular regurgitation * Valve performance, including residual mean gradient * Risk and predictors of coronary obstruction Number and percentage of subjects with above specified outcomes at 30 days , along with individual component of the success, will be presented.
30 days
Durability of the second aortic THV (30 days)
Determine the durability of the second aortic THV: * Subclinical transcatheter heart valve thrombosis at thirty days (when it becomes apparent, but no systematic screening) * Endocarditis Definition of transcatheter heart valve thrombosis Clinical sequelae of a thromboembolic event (e.g. stroke, TIA, retinal occlusion, other evidence of systemic thromboembolism) or worsening valve stenosis/ regurgitation (e.g. signs of heart failure, syncope) and * Haemodynamic valve deterioration Stage 2 or 3 or * Confirmatory imaging (CT evidence of HALT† or TEE findings) In the absence of clinical sequelae, both * Haemodynamic valve deterioration Stage 3 and * Confirmatory imaging (CT evidence of HALT or TEE findings) Number and percentage of subjects with above specified criteria at 3 months, along with individual component of the success, will be presented.
30 days
Durability of the second aortic THV (3 months)
Determine the durability of the second aortic THV: * Subclinical transcatheter heart valve thrombosis at three months (if data obtained, when it becomes apparent, but no systematic screening) * Clinical transcatheter heart valve thrombosis at three months (if data obtained) * Endocarditis For the definition of transcatheter cardiac valve thrombosis, please refer to Outcome 5. Number and percentage of subjects with above specified criteria at 3 months, along with individual component of the success, will be presented.
3 months
Durability of the second aortic THV (12 months)
Determine the durability of the second aortic THV: * Subclinical transcatheter heart valve thrombosis at twelve months (when it becomes apparent, but no systematic screening) * Clinical transcatheter heart valve thrombosis at twelve months * All-cause mortality, stroke, myocardial infarction, and cardiovascular hospitalization at twelve months * Stage II or III structural valve degeneration according to VARC 3 definitions at twelve months (stage I may be documented) * Endocarditis For the definition of transcatheter cardiac valve thrombosis, please refer to Outcome 5. Number and percentage of subjects with above specified criteria at 12 months , along with individual component of the success, will be presented.
12 months
Durability of the second aortic THV (3 years)
Determine the durability of the second aortic THV: * Subclinical transcatheter heart valve thrombosis at 3 years (when it becomes apparent, but no systematic screening) * Clinical transcatheter heart valve thrombosis at 3 years * All-cause mortality, stroke, myocardial infarction, and cardiovascular hospitalization at 3 years For the definition of transcatheter cardiac valve thrombosis, please refer to Outcome 5.
3 years
Durability of the second aortic THV (5 years)
Determine the durability of the second aortic THV: * Subclinical transcatheter heart valve thrombosis at 5 years (when it becomes apparent, but no systematic screening) * Clinical transcatheter heart valve thrombosis at 5 years * All-cause mortality, stroke, myocardial infarction, and cardiovascular hospitalization at 5 years For the definition of transcatheter cardiac valve thrombosis, please refer to Outcome 5.
5 years
Other Outcomes (4)
Compliance with recommendation
12 months
Impact of alterations to published recommendations
12 months
Discretionary longer-term follow-up
up to 5 years
- +1 more other outcomes
Study Arms (1)
redo-TAVI patients
Patients with severe aortic stenosis (sAS) treated with TAVI developing SVD and thus an indication for redo-TAVI procedure
Interventions
Elective redo-TAVI procedure with the intention to treat the patient with a SAPIEN family valve implantation (currently the only registered medical devices for redo-TAVI use)
Eligibility Criteria
Patients with an indication for a redo-TAVI procedure considered eligible by the Local Heart Team and the Case Review Board for a SAPIEN family valve implantation.
You may qualify if:
- Consecutive patients fulfilling the following criteria:
- Consenting adult patient (≥18 years)
- Procedural success of the first TAVI
- TAVI device failure of the index THV, irrespective of SVD severity
- Intention to treat the patient with a redo-TAVI procedure (SAPIEN family THV)
- The Local Heart Team and the Case Review Board consider the patient suitable and indicated for elective redo-TAVI
- Patient is scheduled to undergo a 30 Day and 12 Months follow-up (both visits taking place in the hospital)
You may not qualify if:
- Patients without signed informed consent / data protection statement (according to requirements of local IRB/IEC)
- Life expectancy below 12 months
- Patients with largely incomplete data with respect to the aims of the project
- Pregnant women at the time of the redo-TAVI
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (62)
LKH-University Hospital and Medical University of Graz
Graz, 8010, Austria
Kepler University Clinic Linz
Linz, 4020, Austria
University Hospital St. Pölten
Sankt Pölten, 3100, Austria
Medical University of Vienna
Vienna, 1090, Austria
McGill University Health Centre
Montreal, H4A 3J1, Canada
Institut Universitaire de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie
Québec, QC G1V 4G5, Canada
St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver
Vancouver, BC V6Z 1Y6, Canada
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux
Bordeaux, 33604, France
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Clermont-Ferrand
Clermont-Ferrand, 63003, France
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille
Lille, 59037, France
Hospices Civils de Lyon
Lyon, 69677, France
Hôpitaux Universitaires de Marseille Timone
Marseille, 13005, France
Jacques Cartier Private Hospital, Massy
Massy, 91300, France
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes
Nantes, 44093, France
Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou
Paris, 75015, France
Hôpital Bichat-Claude-Bernard
Paris, 75018, France
Centre hospitalier universitaire de Rennes
Rennes, 35033, France
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rouen
Roubaix, 76000, France
Clinique de la Porte de Paris (CCN)
Saint-Denis, 93200, France
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse
Toulouse, 31059, France
University Heart Center Freiburg Bad Krozingen
Bad Krozingen, 79189, Germany
Kerckhoff-Klinik GmbH, UKGM GmbH
Bad Nauheim, 61231, Germany
Heart and Diabetes Center North Rhine-Westphalia
Bad Oeynhausen, 32545, Germany
German Heart Center of Charité Berlin
Berlin, 13353, Germany
BG University Hospital Bergmannsheil gGmbH
Bochum, 44789, Germany
University Hospital of Duesseldorf
Düsseldorf, 40225, Germany
Elisabeth Hospital, Essen
Essen, 45138, Germany
German Heart Centre Munich
Munich, 80636, Germany
Robert-Bosch-Hospital, Stuttgart
Stuttgart, 70376, Germany
University Hospital Ulm
Ulm, 89070, Germany
Tel Aviv Medical Center
Tel Aviv, 6423906, Israel
AOU Ospedali Riuniti Ancona, Umberto I, G. M. Lancisi, G. Salesi
Ancona, 60126, Italy
IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Bologna
Bologna, 40138, Italy
Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale degli Spedali Civili di Brescia
Brescia, 25123, Italy
Careggi Hospital
Florence, 50134, Italy
IRCCS Ospedale Galeazzi Sant'Ambrogio
Milan, 20157, Italy
Azienda Ospedale-Università Padova (AOUP)
Padua, 35128, Italy
Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana
Pisa, 56124, Italy
Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS
Roma, 00168, Italy
Policlinici universitari | Sapienza Università di Roma
Roma, 00185, Italy
Università degli Studi di Trieste
Trieste, 34149, Italy
Ospedale San Bortolo di Vicenza
Vicenza, 36100, Italy
St. Antonius Ziekenhuis, Nieuwegein
Nieuwegein, 3435, Netherlands
Medical University of Bialystok
Bialystok, 15-089, Poland
University Clinical Centre of Gdańsk
Gdansk, 80-952, Poland
Medical University of Silesia
Katowice, 40-055, Poland
University Hospital of Kraków
Krakow, 31-501, Poland
Medical University of Warsaw
Warsaw, 02-091, Poland
Institute of Cardiology Warsaw
Warsaw, 04-628, Poland
Wroclaw Medical University
Wroclaw, 50-368, Poland
Hospital de Santa Cruz, Carnaxide-Lisabon
Carnaxide, 2790-134, Portugal
Centro Hospitalar Vila Nova de Gaia / Espinho
Vila Nova de Gaia, 4434-502, Portugal
Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau
Barcelona, 08025, Spain
Hospital Clinic de Barcelona
Barcelona, 08036, Spain
Hospital University Germans Trias i Pujol
Barcelona, 08916, Spain
Hospital Universitario de León
León, 24008, Spain
Hospital Clinico Universitario San Carlos
Madrid, 28040, Spain
Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias
Oviedo, 33011, Spain
Hospital Álvaro Cunqueiro, Vigo
Vigo, 36312, Spain
University Hospital of Basel
Basel, 4031, Switzerland
Hôpitaux universitaires de Genève
Geneva, 1205, Switzerland
Centre hospitalier universitaire vaudois et Université de Lausanne
Lausanne, 1011, Switzerland
Related Publications (9)
VARC-3 WRITING COMMITTEE; Genereux P, Piazza N, Alu MC, Nazif T, Hahn RT, Pibarot P, Bax JJ, Leipsic JA, Blanke P, Blackstone EH, Finn MT, Kapadia S, Linke A, Mack MJ, Makkar R, Mehran R, Popma JJ, Reardon M, Rodes-Cabau J, Van Mieghem NM, Webb JG, Cohen DJ, Leon MB. Valve Academic Research Consortium 3: updated endpoint definitions for aortic valve clinical research. Eur Heart J. 2021 May 14;42(19):1825-1857. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa799.
PMID: 33871579BACKGROUNDTarantini G, Delgado V, de Backer O, Sathananthan J, Treede H, Saia F, Blackman D, Parma R. Redo-Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Using the SAPIEN 3/Ultra Transcatheter Heart Valves-Expert Consensus on Procedural Planning and Techniques. Am J Cardiol. 2023 Apr 1;192:228-244. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2023.01.010. Epub 2023 Jan 27.
PMID: 36710143BACKGROUNDLeon MB, Smith CR, Mack M, Miller DC, Moses JW, Svensson LG, Tuzcu EM, Webb JG, Fontana GP, Makkar RR, Brown DL, Block PC, Guyton RA, Pichard AD, Bavaria JE, Herrmann HC, Douglas PS, Petersen JL, Akin JJ, Anderson WN, Wang D, Pocock S; PARTNER Trial Investigators. Transcatheter aortic-valve implantation for aortic stenosis in patients who cannot undergo surgery. N Engl J Med. 2010 Oct 21;363(17):1597-607. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1008232. Epub 2010 Sep 22.
PMID: 20961243BACKGROUNDSmith CR, Leon MB, Mack MJ, Miller DC, Moses JW, Svensson LG, Tuzcu EM, Webb JG, Fontana GP, Makkar RR, Williams M, Dewey T, Kapadia S, Babaliaros V, Thourani VH, Corso P, Pichard AD, Bavaria JE, Herrmann HC, Akin JJ, Anderson WN, Wang D, Pocock SJ; PARTNER Trial Investigators. Transcatheter versus surgical aortic-valve replacement in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med. 2011 Jun 9;364(23):2187-98. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1103510. Epub 2011 Jun 5.
PMID: 21639811BACKGROUNDToggweiler S, Wood DA, Rodes-Cabau J, Kapadia S, Willson AB, Ye J, Cheung A, Leipsic J, Binder RK, Gurvitch R, Freeman M, Thompson CR, Svensson LG, Dumont E, Tuzcu EM, Webb JG. Transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation for failed balloon-expandable transcatheter aortic valves. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 May;5(5):571-577. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2012.03.008.
PMID: 22625197BACKGROUNDKamioka N, Caughron H, Corrigan F, Block P, Babaliaros V. Supra-annular valve strategy for an early degenerated transcatheter balloon-expandable heart valve. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Dec 1;92(7):1458-1460. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27506. Epub 2018 Jan 23.
PMID: 29359409BACKGROUNDWebb JG, Mack MJ, White JM, Dvir D, Blanke P, Herrmann HC, Leipsic J, Kodali SK, Makkar R, Miller DC, Pibarot P, Pichard A, Satler LF, Svensson L, Alu MC, Suri RM, Leon MB. Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Within Degenerated Aortic Surgical Bioprostheses: PARTNER 2 Valve-in-Valve Registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 May 9;69(18):2253-2262. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.02.057.
PMID: 28473128BACKGROUNDDeeb GM, Chetcuti SJ, Reardon MJ, Patel HJ, Grossman PM, Schreiber T, Forrest JK, Bajwa TK, O'Hair DP, Petrossian G, Robinson N, Katz S, Hartman A, Dauerman HL, Schmoker J, Khabbaz K, Watson DR, Yakubov SJ, Oh JK, Li S, Kleiman NS, Adams DH, Popma JJ. 1-Year Results in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement With Failed Surgical Bioprostheses. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 May 22;10(10):1034-1044. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.03.018.
PMID: 28521921BACKGROUNDKopp-Schneider A, Wiesenfarth M, Witt R, Edelmann D, Witt O, Abel U. Monitoring futility and efficacy in phase II trials with Bayesian posterior distributions-A calibration approach. Biom J. 2019 May;61(3):488-502. doi: 10.1002/bimj.201700209. Epub 2018 Sep 2.
PMID: 30175405BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Giuseppe Tarantini, Prof.
University of Padua Medical School, Padua, Italy
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Radoslaw Parma, Dr.
Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland
- STUDY CHAIR
Thomas Cuisset, Prof.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Timone, Marseille, France
- STUDY CHAIR
Victoria Delgado, Prof.
University Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain
- STUDY CHAIR
Michael Joner, Prof.
German Heart Center, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
- STUDY CHAIR
Thomas Modine, Prof.
Hopital Haut Levêque - Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux, France
- STUDY CHAIR
Josep Rodés-Cabau, Prof.
nstitut Universitaire de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie de Québec, Canada
- STUDY CHAIR
Francesco Saia, Prof.
University Hospital of Bologna, Policlinico S. Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna, Italy
- STUDY CHAIR
Hector A. Alvarez Covarrubias, MD
Department of Cardiology, Munich Heart Center, Technical University of Munich, Germany
- STUDY CHAIR
Ginatutas Bieliauskas, MD
Department Interventional Cardiology, The Heart Center, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Coppenhagen, Denmark
- STUDY CHAIR
Luca Nai Fovino, MD
Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padua Medical School, Padua, Italy
- STUDY CHAIR
Eric Van Belle, MD
Interventional Cardiology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille, France
- STUDY CHAIR
Rafał Wolny, MD
Department of Interventional Cardiology and Angiology, National Institute of Cardiology, Warsaw, Poland
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE ONLY
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Target Duration
- 5 Years
- Sponsor Type
- NETWORK
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 7, 2022
First Posted
November 1, 2022
Study Start
September 5, 2023
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2031
Last Updated
August 20, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
no individual participant data (IPD) will be shared