Denosumab vs Zoledronate After Vertebroplasty
Denosumab vs Zoledronate in Patients With Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fracture After Percutaneous Vertebroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
75
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture (OVCF) patients had a proportion of secondary fractures after percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP). Denosumab and zoledronate acid is both effective to prevent bone loss for OVCF postmenopausal women. However, trial evidence comparing effect of denosumab vs zoledronate after PVP was unknown. The study aims to assess the efficiency of denosumab vs zoledronate for OVCF patients bone mineral density (BMD), bone turnover markers (BTMs), secondary fracture and adverse events after PVP.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4
Started Jan 2021
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 12, 2021
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 25, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 28, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 10, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 14, 2023
CompletedJanuary 18, 2023
January 1, 2023
2 years
October 25, 2022
January 15, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (6)
Lumbar bone mineral density(BMD)
Lumbar vertebral (L1 to L4, except the surgery segment) BMD were determined at baseline, 6 and 12 months via dual- energy X-ray
up to 12 months
Total hip BMD
Total hip BMD were determined at baseline, 6 and 12 months via dual-energy X-ray.
up to 12 months
Femoral neck BMD
Femoral neck BMD were determined at baseline, 6 and 12 month via dual-energy X-ray
up to 12 months
Procollagen type 1 n-terminal propeptide (P1NP)
Bone formation marker, P1NP were determined at baseline, 6 and 12 months after surgery.
up to 12 months
C-terminal cross-linked type 1 collagen terminal peptide (CTX)
Bone resorption marker, CTX were determined at baseline, 6 and 12 months after surgery
up to 12 months
Visual analog scale (VAS) back
The VAS score for back pain were determined at baseline, 6 and 12 month. Use a ruler about 10cm long, one side is marked with "0" and the other "10" respectively. A score of 0 indicates no pain, 10 indicates the most unbearable pain.
up to 12 months
Secondary Outcomes (5)
The Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire
up to 12 month
The QUALEFFO-31 Questionnaire
up to 12 month
The EQ-5D Questionnaire
up to 12 month
Secondary fracture rate
up to 12 month
Adverse events
up to 12 month
Study Arms (2)
Denosumab
EXPERIMENTAL1 ml (60 mg) of denosumab (Prolia; Amgen, Inc) subcutaneous injection plus intravenous placebo every 6 months
zoledronate
ACTIVE COMPARATORIntravenous zoledronic acid 5 mg plus subcutaneous placebo every 12 months.
Interventions
1 ml (60 mg) of denosumab (Prolia; Amgen, Inc) subcutaneous injection plus intravenous placebo every 6 months (Q6M)
Intravenous zoledronic acid 5 mg plus subcutaneous placebo every 12 months
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Must be age between 50 and 90 years old
- X-ray diagnosis of 1 or 2 segment vertebral compression fractures from T4 to L5
- Bone mineral density T value less than -1 via dual-energy X-ray
- A recent fracture history less than 6 weeks
- MRI show bone marrow edema of fractured vertebrae
- low back pain, local paravertebral tenderness
You may not qualify if:
- Must be able to have no intervertebral fissure
- Must be able to have no infection
- Must be able to have no malignancy
- Must be able to have no neurological dysfunction
- Must be able to have no previous use of anti-osteoporosis drugs
- Must be able to have no inability to perform magnetic resonance imaging
- Must be able to have no prior back open surgery
- Must be able to have no other established contraindications for elective surgery
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
ShenzhenPH
Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518000, China
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Xiao Xiao, Doctor
Shenzhen People's Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Participants were randomized using a block randomization model (block size 5). Computer-generated, random-number sequences were prepared by an experienced statistician. Consecutive treatment allocations were stored in sealed opaque envelopes and assigned to doctors. Patients and doctors were blinded to the assignments; all researchers and data analysts were blinded as to the allocation during the 12-month follow-up period.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 25, 2022
First Posted
October 28, 2022
Study Start
January 12, 2021
Primary Completion
January 10, 2023
Study Completion
January 14, 2023
Last Updated
January 18, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share