Two Bed SPECT/CT Versus Planar Bone Scintigraphy in Detection of Osseous Metastases in Patients With Genitourinary Malignancies
1 other identifier
observational
70
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The study aims to compare the diagnostic performance of planar bone scan and two bed SPECT/CT in detection of bone metastases in patients with urogenital cancer.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
Started Dec 2022
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 24, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 27, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2024
CompletedOctober 27, 2022
October 1, 2022
1.8 years
October 24, 2022
October 26, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Comparison of diagnostic performance indices between two-bed SPECT/CT images and planar bone scans.
Analysis and comparison of diagnostic performance indices between two-bed SPECT/CT images and planar bone scans for the detection of osseous metastases in genitourinary malignancies.
through study completion, an average of 2 years
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Identification of patients' subgroups who might be best assessed upfront by two-bed SPECT/CT.
through study completion, an average of 2 years
Identification of anatomical site which may be best assessed by SPECT/CT.
through study completion, an average of 2 years
Interventions
Injection of radioactive element (Tc-99m MDP) then imaging with gamma camera and low dose CT (SPECT/CT)
Eligibility Criteria
All adult patients with known genitourinary cancer who are referred for bone scan as a part of metastatic workup.
You may qualify if:
- Adult patients with urogenital cancer referred for bone scan.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with claustrophobia.
- Patients refuse to do the scan.
- Patients with relative or absolute contraindications to do the scan (eg. pregnancy).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (8)
Zarrabi K, Paroya A, Wu S. Emerging therapeutic agents for genitourinary cancers. J Hematol Oncol. 2019 Sep 4;12(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s13045-019-0780-z.
PMID: 31484560BACKGROUNDCosta WH, Jabboure G Netto, Cunha IW. Urological cancer related to familial syndromes. Int Braz J Urol. 2017 Mar-Apr;43(2):192-201. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2016.0125.
PMID: 27819754BACKGROUNDVan den Wyngaert T, Strobel K, Kampen WU, Kuwert T, van der Bruggen W, Mohan HK, Gnanasegaran G, Delgado-Bolton R, Weber WA, Beheshti M, Langsteger W, Giammarile F, Mottaghy FM, Paycha F; EANM Bone & Joint Committee and the Oncology Committee. The EANM practice guidelines for bone scintigraphy. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016 Aug;43(9):1723-38. doi: 10.1007/s00259-016-3415-4. Epub 2016 Jun 4.
PMID: 27262701BACKGROUNDRager O, Nkoulou R, Exquis N, Garibotto V, Tabouret-Viaud C, Zaidi H, Amzalag G, Lee-Felker SA, Zilli T, Ratib O. Whole-Body SPECT/CT versus Planar Bone Scan with Targeted SPECT/CT for Metastatic Workup. Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:7039406. doi: 10.1155/2017/7039406. Epub 2017 Jul 24.
PMID: 28812019BACKGROUNDUmer M, Mohib Y, Atif M, Nazim M. Skeletal metastasis in renal cell carcinoma: A review. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2018 Jan 31;27:9-16. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2018.01.002. eCollection 2018 Mar.
PMID: 29511536BACKGROUNDShen G, Deng H, Hu S, Jia Z. Comparison of choline-PET/CT, MRI, SPECT, and bone scintigraphy in the diagnosis of bone metastases in patients with prostate cancer: a meta-analysis. Skeletal Radiol. 2014 Nov;43(11):1503-13. doi: 10.1007/s00256-014-1903-9. Epub 2014 May 20.
PMID: 24841276BACKGROUNDde Leiris N, Leenhardt J, Boussat B, Montemagno C, Seiller A, Phan Sy O, Roux J, Laramas M, Verry C, Iriart C, Fiard G, Long JA, Descotes JL, Vuillez JP, Riou L, Djaileb L. Does whole-body bone SPECT/CT provide additional diagnostic information over [18F]-FCH PET/CT for the detection of bone metastases in the setting of prostate cancer biochemical recurrence? Cancer Imaging. 2020 Aug 12;20(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s40644-020-00333-y.
PMID: 32787923BACKGROUNDZacho HD, Manresa JAB, Aleksyniene R, Ejlersen JA, Fledelius J, Bertelsen H, Petersen LJ. Three-minute SPECT/CT is sufficient for the assessment of bone metastasis as add-on to planar bone scintigraphy: prospective head-to-head comparison to 11-min SPECT/CT. EJNMMI Res. 2017 Dec;7(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s13550-016-0252-1. Epub 2017 Jan 5.
PMID: 28058659BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Samir S Mohamed, Professor
Assiut University
- STUDY DIRECTOR
HebatAllah A Askar, Lecturer
Assiut University
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Rehab M Helmy, Lecturer
Assiut University
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Maram M Shafeek, Resident
Assiut University
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE ONLY
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 24, 2022
First Posted
October 27, 2022
Study Start
December 1, 2022
Primary Completion
September 1, 2024
Study Completion
December 1, 2024
Last Updated
October 27, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-10