Effect of Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing Therapy 2.0 Online Group Protocol
1 other identifier
interventional
77
1 country
1
Brief Summary
In this study, it will be investigated the efficacy of Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing Therapy 2.0 Online Group Protocol on post-traumatic symptoms compared to control group. Therefore, the randomized control trial is based on Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing Therapy 2.0 group as an intervention.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2022
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 14, 2022
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 21, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 27, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 20, 2023
CompletedMay 9, 2023
May 1, 2023
18 days
October 21, 2022
May 7, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
The Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale - 21 Items (DASS-21)
Depression, stress and anxiety scores will significantly change. Scores for depression, anxiety and stress are calculated by summing the scores. The scores are between 0-3, and more scores mean worse results. for the relevant items
1-week and 1-month follow-up
Impact of Events Scale Revised (IES-R)
Intrusion and hyperarousal scores will significantly change. The maximum mean score on each of the three subscales is '4', therefore the maximum 'total mean' IES- R score is 12. Lower scores are better.
1-week and 1-month follow-up
Study Arms (2)
EMDR 2.0
EXPERIMENTALEMDR 2.0 Online Group protocol will be administered.
Control
ACTIVE COMPARATORMental Health Gap Action Programme (mhGAP) will be administered.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Being older than 18
- Having a traffic accident between 6 months and 10 years
- Having necessary knowledge on using relevant technological devices
You may not qualify if:
- Having mental deterioration after the accident
- Having a lower score of 7 on Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs)
- Having pre-existing psychotic disorder
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Academy of Therapeutic Sciences
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (11)
Baddeley A. Working memory: theories, models, and controversies. Annu Rev Psychol. 2012;63:1-29. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100422. Epub 2011 Sep 27.
PMID: 21961947RESULTde Jongh A, Ernst R, Marques L, Hornsveld H. The impact of eye movements and tones on disturbing memories involving PTSD and other mental disorders. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2013 Dec;44(4):477-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2013.07.002. Epub 2013 Jul 13.
PMID: 23892070RESULTLittel, M., Remijn, M., Tinga, A. M., Engelhard, I. M., & van den Hout, M. A. (2017). Stress Enhances the Memory-Degrading Effects of Eye Movements on Emotionally Neutral Memories. Clinical Psychological Science, 5(2), 316-324. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167702616687292
RESULTLittel M, van Schie K. No evidence for the inverted U-Curve: More demanding dual tasks cause stronger aversive memory degradation. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2019 Dec;65:101484. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2019.101484. Epub 2019 May 13.
PMID: 31125845RESULTMatthijssen SJMA, Verhoeven LCM, van den Hout MA, Heitland I. Auditory and Visual Memories in PTSD Patients Targeted with Eye Movements and Counting: The Effect of Modality-Specific Loading of Working Memory. Front Psychol. 2017 Nov 3;8:1937. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01937. eCollection 2017.
PMID: 29163311RESULTMatthijssen SJMA, van Beerschoten LM, de Jongh A, Klugkist IG, van den Hout MA. Effects of "Visual Schema Displacement Therapy" (VSDT), an abbreviated EMDR protocol and a control condition on emotionality and vividness of aversive memories: Two critical analogue studies. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2019 Jun;63:48-56. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2018.11.006. Epub 2018 Nov 27.
PMID: 30514434RESULTMatthijssen SJMA, van Schie K, van den Hout MA. The Effect of modality specific interference on working memory in recalling aversive auditory and visual memories. Cogn Emot. 2019 Sep;33(6):1169-1180. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2018.1547271. Epub 2018 Nov 22.
PMID: 30465479RESULTMatthijssen SJMA, Brouwers T, van Roozendaal C, Vuister T, de Jongh A. The effect of EMDR versus EMDR 2.0 on emotionality and vividness of aversive memories in a non-clinical sample. Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2021 Sep 22;12(1):1956793. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2021.1956793. eCollection 2021.
PMID: 34567439RESULTvan den Hout MA, Eidhof MB, Verboom J, Littel M, Engelhard IM. Blurring of emotional and non-emotional memories by taxing working memory during recall. Cogn Emot. 2014;28(4):717-27. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2013.848785. Epub 2013 Nov 7.
PMID: 24199660RESULTvan Veen SC, van Schie K, Wijngaards-de Meij LD, Littel M, Engelhard IM, van den Hout MA. Speed Matters: Relationship between Speed of Eye Movements and Modification of Aversive Autobiographical Memories. Front Psychiatry. 2015 Apr 7;6:45. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2015.00045. eCollection 2015.
PMID: 25904871RESULTYasar AB, Gundogmus I, Kubilay D, Alban Tunca G, Uygun E, Zat Ciftci Z, Kavakci O. The effectiveness of online Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing 2.0 Group Protocol on post-traumatic stress disorders symptoms, depression, anxiety, and stress in individuals who have experienced a traffic accident: a randomized-controlled study. Front Psychiatry. 2025 May 9;16:1452206. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1452206. eCollection 2025.
PMID: 40417270DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Masking Details
- Single
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 21, 2022
First Posted
October 27, 2022
Study Start
October 14, 2022
Primary Completion
November 1, 2022
Study Completion
January 20, 2023
Last Updated
May 9, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share