Studying the Modification of Attention Bias Remotely After Trauma
SMART
Optimizing Attention Bias Modification for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: An Entirely Remote Study
1 other identifier
interventional
1,314
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The investigators will complete an entirely remote randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing 14 sessions of attention bias modification (ABM), attention control training (ACT), placebo neutral attention training, and a final control condition with daily questions in 1,897 individuals with clinically significant Post-traumatic Stress Symptoms (PTSS) (defined as PCL-5 score ≥ 33). To assess effects of the training and control conditions, the investigators will administer tests of threat-related attention bias and variability, and self-report assessments of PTSS, depression, anxiety, and perceived stress at baseline, after one and two weeks of training, and at eight-week follow up. The investigators plan to screen and confirm interest from over 3,000 eligible participants over a period of 24 months to enroll and randomize 1,897 participants with the end goal of 1,232 completers (176 per condition).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Apr 2023
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 11, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 17, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 20, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 30, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 30, 2025
CompletedDecember 24, 2025
December 1, 2025
2.2 years
May 11, 2021
December 22, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Change in PTSD Checklist-5 (PCL) Score (Before/After Training)
Looking at the change of PCL scores from prior to beginning (baseline) and directly after completing the training at week 4. PCL scores range from 0-80 with a score of 33 indicating clinically significant levels of PTSD. A 10 point change (up or down) is considered a clinically significant change in PTSD symptoms. A PCL score of \<33 indicates non-clinically significant PTSS. A PCL score of \>= 33 indicates clinically significant PTSS.
Baseline, 4 weeks
Change in PTSD Checklist-5 (PCL) Score (Follow-up)
Looking at the change of PCL scores from directly after completing the training at 4 weeks to a follow-up conducted at week 8. PCL scores range from 0-80 with a score of 33 indicating clinically significant levels of PTSD. A 10 point change (up or down) is considered a clinically significant change in PTSD symptoms. A PCL score of \<33 indicates non-clinically significant PTSS. A PCL score of \>= 33 indicates clinically significant PTSS.
4 weeks, 8 Weeks
Study Arms (7)
Attention Bias Modification - Word Stimuli
EXPERIMENTALAttention bias modification training involves a probe detection task as follows: (1) a fixation cross appears on the screen for 500ms; (2) the fixation cross is replaced by two target stimuli (one threat word and one neutral word) that are displayed at the top and the bottom of the screen for 500ms; (2) the stimuli disappear and a visual probe appears (the letter E or F), in the location of one of the two stimuli until the participant responds to indicate whether the letter was an E or an F using response buttons at the bottom of the phone screen. In the active ABM condition, the probe replaces the neutral stimulus 100% of the time.
Attention Bias Modification - Face Stimuli
ACTIVE COMPARATORAttention bias modification training involves a probe detection task as follows: (1) a fixation cross appears on the screen for 500ms; (2) the fixation cross is replaced by two target stimuli (one threatening face and one neutral face) that are displayed at the top and the bottom of the screen for 500ms; (2) the stimuli disappear and a visual probe appears (the letter E or F), in the location of one of the two stimuli until the participant responds to indicate whether the letter was an E or an F using response buttons at the bottom of the phone screen. In the active ABM condition, the probe replaces the neutral stimulus 100% of the time.
Attention Control Training - Word Stimuli
EXPERIMENTALAttention control training involves a probe detection task as follows: (1) a fixation cross appears on the screen for 500ms; (2) the fixation cross is replaced by two target stimuli (i.e. one threat word and one neutral word) that are displayed at the top and the bottom of the screen for 500ms; (2) the stimuli disappear and a visual probe appears (the letter E or F), in the location of one of the two stimuli until the participant responds to indicate whether the letter was an E or an F using response buttons at the bottom of the phone screen. In the active ACT condition, the probe replaces the neutral stimulus 50% of the time, and replaces the threat stimulus the other 50%.
Attention Control Training - Face Stimuli
ACTIVE COMPARATORAttention control training involves a probe detection task as follows: (1) a fixation cross appears on the screen for 500ms; (2) the fixation cross is replaced by two target stimuli (one threatening face and one neutral face) that are displayed at the top and the bottom of the screen for 500ms; (2) the stimuli disappear and a visual probe appears (the letter E or F), in the location of one of the two stimuli until the participant responds to indicate whether the letter was an E or an F using response buttons at the bottom of the phone screen. In the active ACT condition, the probe replaces the neutral stimulus 50% of the time, and replaces the threat stimulus the other 50%.
Placebo Attention Training - Word Stimuli
PLACEBO COMPARATORPlacebo attention training involves a probe detection task as follows: (1) a fixation cross appears on the screen for 500ms; (2) the fixation cross is replaced by two target stimuli (two neutral words) that are displayed at the top and the bottom of the screen for 500ms; (2) the stimuli disappear and a visual probe appears (the letter E or F), in the location of one of the two stimuli until the participant responds to indicate whether the letter was an E or an F using response buttons at the bottom of the phone screen.
Placebo Attention Training - Face Stimuli
PLACEBO COMPARATORPlacebo attention training involves a probe detection task as follows: (1) a fixation cross appears on the screen for 500ms; (2) the fixation cross is replaced by two target stimuli (two neutral faces) that are displayed at the top and the bottom of the screen for 500ms; (2) the stimuli disappear and a visual probe appears (the letter E or F), in the location of one of the two stimuli until the participant responds to indicate whether the letter was an E or an F using response buttons at the bottom of the phone screen.
Control - Questions
SHAM COMPARATORThe Control - Questions condition will only deliver a set of daily questions for participants to answer. Questions will ask about a variety of psychological factors such as mood, stress experiences, daily exercise and more.
Interventions
ABM involves placing the probe behind the neutral stimulus on 100% of the trials.
ACT involves placing the probe behind the neutral stimulus on 50% of trials, and behind the threat stimulus on 50% of trials.
Placebo training only includes neutral stimuli.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Aged 18 to 65 years
- Score at or above 33 on the PCL-5,
- Able and willing to perform daily smartphone training for two weeks
- Fluent English comprehension.
- Owns Android or iPhone smartphone
You may not qualify if:
- Does not have Android or iPhone Operating System (iOS) smartphone running sufficient software (i.e. at least iOS 10.1), and is not willing to update
- Active suicidality.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Tommy Atwater
San Francisco, California, 94143, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Joshua Woolley, MD, PhD
UCSF, SFVAMC
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Joaquin Anguera, PhD
University of California, San Francisco
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 11, 2021
First Posted
May 17, 2021
Study Start
April 20, 2023
Primary Completion
June 30, 2025
Study Completion
June 30, 2025
Last Updated
December 24, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share