NCT05595096

Brief Summary

the aim of this study is to evaluate the advantages of the non-intubation compared with intubation anesthesia on enhanced recovery after thoracoscopic surgery

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
59

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2021

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 1, 2021

Completed
12 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 31, 2022

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 31, 2022

Completed
9 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 18, 2022

Completed
8 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 26, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

October 26, 2022

Status Verified

October 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

12 months

First QC Date

October 18, 2022

Last Update Submit

October 25, 2022

Conditions

Keywords

Spontaneous breathing anesthesia

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • the hospitalized stay

    the hospitalized stay

    1 year

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Visual analogue score (VAS) after operation;

    1 year

  • The postoperative complications

    1 year

Study Arms (2)

spontaneous breathing anesthesia non-intubation group

EXPERIMENTAL

In this group all the patients with spontaneous breathing anesthesia

Procedure: General anesthesia with preservation of spontaneous breathing

general anesthesia with double-lumen endotracheal intubation group

NO INTERVENTION

In this group all the patients with tradition anesthesia with double-lumen endotracheal intubation

Interventions

non-intubation group, thoracic paravertebral nerve block was performed before anesthesia induction,when the BIS value drops to between 40 and 60, laryngeal mask airway(LMA) is placed,and observation of breathing

spontaneous breathing anesthesia non-intubation group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 69 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • age 18-69 years old
  • Body mass index (BMI) was 18-24 kg / m2
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists' physical classification class I-II
  • The preoperative pulmonary function was normal

You may not qualify if:

  • Severe cardiopulmonary disease
  • Severe nervous system diseases
  • Severe blood system diseases
  • Severe liver and kidney dysfunction
  • Conversion to thoracotomy

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Affiliated People's Hospital of Jiangsu University

Zhenjiang, Jiangsu, 212002, China

Location

Related Publications (19)

  • Zheng H, Hu XF, Jiang GN, Ding JA, Zhu YM. Nonintubated-Awake Anesthesia for Uniportal Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery Procedures. Thorac Surg Clin. 2017 Nov;27(4):399-406. doi: 10.1016/j.thorsurg.2017.06.008.

    PMID: 28962712BACKGROUND
  • Hung WT, Cheng YJ, Chen JS. Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery Lobectomy for Lung Cancer in Nonintubated Anesthesia. Thorac Surg Clin. 2020 Feb;30(1):73-82. doi: 10.1016/j.thorsurg.2019.09.002.

  • AlGhamdi ZM, Lynhiavu L, Moon YK, Moon MH, Ahn S, Kim Y, Sung SW. Comparison of non-intubated versus intubated video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy for lung cancer. J Thorac Dis. 2018 Jul;10(7):4236-4243. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.06.163.

  • Kocaturk C, Kutluk AC, Usluer O, Onat S, Cinar HU, Yanik F, Cesur E, Ulku R, Karamustafaoglu A, Celik B, Demirhan R, Kalafat CE, Ozpolat B. Comparison of awake and intubated video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in the diagnosis of pleural diseases: A prospective multicenter randomized trial. Turk Gogus Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Derg. 2019 Oct 23;27(4):550-556. doi: 10.5606/tgkdc.dergisi.2019.18214. eCollection 2019 Oct.

  • Senturk JC, Kristo G, Gold J, Bleday R, Whang E. The Development of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Across Surgical Specialties. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2017 Sep;27(9):863-870. doi: 10.1089/lap.2017.0317. Epub 2017 Aug 10.

  • Guo Z, Shao W, Yin W, Chen H, Zhang X, Dong Q, Liang L, Wang W, Peng G, He J. Analysis of feasibility and safety of complete video-assisted thoracoscopic resection of anatomic pulmonary segments under non-intubated anesthesia. J Thorac Dis. 2014 Jan;6(1):37-44. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2014.01.06.

  • Gonzalez M, Abdelnour-Berchtold E, Perentes JY, Doucet V, Zellweger M, Marcucci C, Ris HB, Krueger T, Gronchi F. An enhanced recovery after surgery program for video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery anatomical lung resections is cost-effective. J Thorac Dis. 2018 Oct;10(10):5879-5888. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.09.100.

  • Krediet AC, Moayeri N, van Geffen GJ, Bruhn J, Renes S, Bigeleisen PE, Groen GJ. Different Approaches to Ultrasound-guided Thoracic Paravertebral Block: An Illustrated Review. Anesthesiology. 2015 Aug;123(2):459-74. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000747.

  • Kehlet H. Multimodal approach to control postoperative pathophysiology and rehabilitation. Br J Anaesth. 1997 May;78(5):606-17. doi: 10.1093/bja/78.5.606.

  • Ljungqvist O, Scott M, Fearon KC. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery: A Review. JAMA Surg. 2017 Mar 1;152(3):292-298. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.4952.

  • Shen C, Che G. Tubeless minimally invasive treatment: taking a new step in enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS). Thorac Cancer. 2019 Nov;10(11):2067-2070. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.13206. Epub 2019 Oct 7. No abstract available.

  • Liu J, Cui F, Li S, Chen H, Shao W, Liang L, Yin W, Lin Y, He J. Nonintubated video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery under epidural anesthesia compared with conventional anesthetic option: a randomized control study. Surg Innov. 2015 Apr;22(2):123-30. doi: 10.1177/1553350614531662. Epub 2014 May 12.

  • Huang QW, Li JB, Huang Y, Zhang WQ, Lu ZW. A Comparison of Analgesia After a Thoracoscopic Lung Cancer Operation with a Sustained Epidural Block and a Sustained Paravertebral Block: A Randomized Controlled Study. Adv Ther. 2020 Sep;37(9):4000-4014. doi: 10.1007/s12325-020-01446-3. Epub 2020 Jul 31.

  • Chen N, Qiao Q, Chen R, Xu Q, Zhang Y, Tian Y. The effect of ultrasound-guided intercostal nerve block, single-injection erector spinae plane block and multiple-injection paravertebral block on postoperative analgesia in thoracoscopic surgery: A randomized, double-blinded, clinical trial. J Clin Anesth. 2020 Feb;59:106-111. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2019.07.002. Epub 2019 Jul 19.

  • El-Boghdadly K, Madjdpour C, Chin KJ. Thoracic paravertebral blocks in abdominal surgery - a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Br J Anaesth. 2016 Sep;117(3):297-308. doi: 10.1093/bja/aew269.

  • Schnabel A, Reichl SU, Kranke P, Pogatzki-Zahn EM, Zahn PK. Efficacy and safety of paravertebral blocks in breast surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Br J Anaesth. 2010 Dec;105(6):842-52. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeq265. Epub 2010 Oct 14.

  • Janik M, Juhos P, Lucenic M, Tarabova K. Non-intubated Thoracoscopic Surgery-Pros and Cons. Front Surg. 2021 Dec 6;8:801718. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.801718. eCollection 2021.

  • Qi L, Chen K, Luo B, Mao G, Pan L, Huang H, Li J, Chen S. Clinical application of preserving spontaneous breathing non-intubation anesthesia in thoracoscopic surgery for lung cancer under ERAS concept. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2022 Oct;18(5):e329-e337. doi: 10.1111/ajco.13726. Epub 2021 Nov 24.

  • Cai LS, Hou B, Jin H, Bo Y, Chen XL, Dai J, Yang T, Lan BS, Ye J, Peng H, Peng J. Clinical evaluation of the rapid recovery of patients who underwent video-assisted thoracoscopic lung surgery under non-intubated anesthesia. Ann Transl Med. 2021 Dec;9(24):1783. doi: 10.21037/atm-21-6434.

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Anesthesia, General

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

AnesthesiaAnesthesia and Analgesia

Study Officials

  • sun caixia, doctor

    Department of Anesthesiology, Affiliated People's Hospital of Jiangsu University

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: non-intubation group: thoracic paravertebral nerve block was performed before anesthesia induction,after anesthesia induction laryngeal mask airway(LMA) is placed. intubation group:were given routine induction with double-lumen endotracheal intubation.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 18, 2022

First Posted

October 26, 2022

Study Start

February 1, 2021

Primary Completion

January 31, 2022

Study Completion

January 31, 2022

Last Updated

October 26, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-10

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

all collected IPD, all IPD that underlie results in a publication

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP
Time Frame
Data are available after publication and up to one year after publication
Access Criteria
Send an email to zhengyf.163@163.com

Locations