Guided Bone Regeneration Versus Bone Block Grafting
Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Comparing the Clinical Measures and the Radiographical Volumetric Outcomes Assessed by Cone Beam Computed Tomography of Guided Bone Regeneration Versus Bone Block Grafting
1 other identifier
interventional
44
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to analyze the volumetric gain and stability of the newly formed bone tissue comparing guided bone regeneration with block graft.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2022
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 5, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 25, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 2, 2023
CompletedAugust 29, 2023
October 1, 2022
8 months
September 5, 2022
August 28, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Bone volume
the bone volume will be analyzed with the Cone Beam Computed Tomography scan
6 Months follow up
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Periodontal parameters
6 Months follow up
Wound healing
2 weeks follow up
Histological analysis
6 Months follow up
Study Arms (2)
Guided bone regeneration
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients will be treated with guided bone regeneration.
Bone block
EXPERIMENTALPatients will be treated with bone blocks using the Khoury technique.
Interventions
the bone block will be used following the principles of the Khoury technique to augment the bone volume.
the membrane and the bone granules will be used to perform the guided bone regeneration technique.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients in need of an implant-supported rehabilitation
- Patients requiring bone regeneration
- Healthy patients
- Full-mouth plaque score (FMPS) and full-mouth bleeding score (FMBS) ≤ 15%
- Sufficient mesiodistal and interocclusal space
- At least 6 months of follow-up
You may not qualify if:
- An American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification ≥ III
- General contraindications for surgical treatment or implant placement
- Untreated periodontitis
- Smoking
- Excessive alcohol consumption
- Any drug or medication known to affect oral status and bone turnover or contraindicate surgical treatment
- No residual keratinized tissue at the experimental area
- Unwillingness to return for follow-up examinations
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Fondazione Policlinico Gemelli
Rome, Italy
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Antonio D'Addona, DDS
Fondazione Policlinico Gemelli
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 5, 2022
First Posted
October 25, 2022
Study Start
November 1, 2022
Primary Completion
July 1, 2023
Study Completion
July 2, 2023
Last Updated
August 29, 2023
Record last verified: 2022-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share