Knowledge of Nutritional Concerns in Physically Active Females
Effectiveness of an Educational Intervention Tool Related to Nutritional Concerns in Physically Active Female Young Adults
1 other identifier
interventional
33
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to determine whether implementation of an educational tool for nutritional concerns in 18-25-year-old females who participate in sport increases their understanding of various nutritional concerns. By studying an educational tool geared towards nutritional concerns of the female athlete, clinicians can use the information to improve clinical practice and patient outcomes. Procedure: Participants will be asked to complete a previously validated survey assessing knowledge of nutritional concerns of female athletes: the Female Athlete Triad, Relative Energy Deficiency in Sport, and eating disorders. The survey will be completed immediately pre- and post-receipt of the educational intervention. The intervention includes education on the previously mentioned nutritional concerns.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2023
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 17, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 21, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 9, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 28, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 5, 2023
CompletedMay 11, 2023
October 1, 2022
4 months
October 17, 2022
May 9, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Change in Knowledge Score
Participants will be asked 37 questions in the survey assessing their knowledge on nutritional concerns. Each correctly answered question is worth 1 point and each incorrectly answered question is worth -1 point. The highest possible score a participant can receive is 37. The lowest possible score a participant can receive is -37. Higher scores indicate higher levels of knowledge.
~10 min for pre-test followed by ~10 min intervention followed by ~10 min post-test.
Change in Confidence Score
Corresponding to each Knowledge question was a Likert scale for confidence (i.e. "How confident are you in this response?"). Response options on the Confidence options ranged from 0 to 5, with 0 indicating "No confidence" and 5 indicating "Completely sure". The total Confidence score is the sum of all confidence responses from each of the scored knowledge questions. The total number of Confidence points ranged from 0-148. A higher confidence score indicates greater confidence from the participant in their knowledge answers. Higher scores indicate higher levels of confidence.
~10 min for pre-test followed by ~10 min intervention followed by ~10 min post-test.
Change in Impact Score
The score quantifies the correctness of an answer combined with the level of confidence. Each question has a score range between -1 and 1. The correctness of the answer and level of confidence in the answer produces the Impact score. One point is given for the correct answer and high confidence and one point is subtracted for the incorrect answer and high confidence. The score of the questions is reduced when the respondent has lower confidence in their answer. The scale of confidence corresponds to the following points for impact scoring: Confidence 4 = 1 point, Confidence 3 = 0.75 points, Confidence 2 = 0.5 points, Confidence 1 = 0.25 points, Confidence 0 = 0 points. The total Impact score is the sum of each question's score. Higher scores indicate both high levels of knowledge and confidence simultaneously.
~10 min for pre-test followed by ~10 min intervention followed by ~10 min post-test.
Study Arms (1)
Knowledge Assessment and Educational Intervention
EXPERIMENTALAll participants will be asked to complete the pre-intervention survey assessing knowledge and confidence of female athlete nutritional concerns. Then participants will engage in an educational intervention on these same topics. Following the intervention, participants will repeat the same survey.
Interventions
Visual and audio information presented within the Qualtrics system will cover topics on the Female Athlete Triad, Relative Energy Deficiency in Sport, and eating disorders.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Female
- Ages 18-25
- Participate in organized sport
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599, United States
Related Publications (1)
Lodge MT, Ackerman KE, Garay J. Knowledge of Triad and RED-S in Female Cross-Country Athletes and Support Staff. J Athl Train. 2021 Jul 30. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-0175.21. Online ahead of print.
PMID: 34329432BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Lauren Woelffer
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 17, 2022
First Posted
October 21, 2022
Study Start
January 9, 2023
Primary Completion
April 28, 2023
Study Completion
May 5, 2023
Last Updated
May 11, 2023
Record last verified: 2022-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL
- Time Frame
- Beginning 9 months and ending 36 months following article publication.
- Access Criteria
- Data will be made available from the PI upon request.
Deidentified individual data that supports the results will be shared beginning 9 to 36 months following publication provided the investigator who proposes to use the data has approval from an Institutional Review Board (IRB), Independent Ethics Committee (IEC), or Research Ethics Board (REB), as applicable, and executes a data use/sharing agreement with UNC.